Summers To Head NEC, Draft Stimulus

by: Chris Bowers

Sun Nov 23, 2008 at 14:30


While Larry Summers did not become Treasury Secretary, it doesn't feel like a victory given the enormous power he has been granted anyway:

President-elect Barack Obama will name former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers the director of his National Economic Council, placing the Harvard University economist he passed over for Treasury secretary inside the White House as his closest economic adviser, Democratic officials said Saturday night.

The move came as the president-elect prepares Monday to introduce his new Treasury secretary nominee, Timothy Geithner, and the rest of his economic team at an event in Chicago Monday.

Among those on stage will be Mr. Summers, who was central to his campaign's economic team and is now leading efforts to draft a massive economic stimulus plan the president-elect hopes to sign into law as one of his first acts as the nation's leader.

Hopefully, there will be some better voices on the economic team than what we have seen so far. David Bonior and Robert Reich also played prominent roles on Obama's economic team, so hopefully there will still be influential roles for them. I was hoping that one of those two would receive a top economic position, whether Treasury, the National Economic Council, or Commerce, which has now gone to Richardson.

Progressives do seem to have won most House leadership positions, with Hoyer as an obvious exception. While it is extremely disappointing that there is no progressive equivalent of Hoyer in a high-level cabinet position, either on foreign policy or on economics, the House does control the purse strings. As such, the progressive voices at the table will be Nancy Pelosi, Henry Waxman, and Barney Frank, who recently called for 25% cuts in defense spending. So, progressives won't be entirely cut out of high-level discussions in the new Democratic trifecta, except, it appears, when cabinet meetings are held.

Chris Bowers :: Summers To Head NEC, Draft Stimulus

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Odd (4.00 / 2)
is now leading efforts to draft a massive economic stimulus plan the president-elect hopes to sign into law as one of his first acts as the nation's leader.

Obama mentioned this yesterday morning and yet Open Left diarists are completely avoiding it, instead focusing on rumors of things that might possibly be negative.

Why?


Do you feel confience .. (4.00 / 2)
since Summers and Robert Rubin are part of what is ailing this country economically right now? .. Are you pleased that the Gov't now has to bail out Citigroup due to Rubin not doing his job(meaning the job he's had since leaving the Clinton WH)?

[ Parent ]
Not mentioning what, exactly? (4.00 / 1)
What is your accusation, exactly? That the stimulus plan is a positive--even though it isn't written yet--we are not focusing on?

I just mentioned the stimulus plan. I just pointed out that Summers will be writing it. Given that we just spent the last 17 days arguing against Summers, I'm not sure what positive I am missing.

We don't know what the stimulus plan will be. We do know that Summers is writing it. I thus mentioned what we know about the stimulus.

But please, tell me what huge positives I am missing here. Seriously. I'd like to know.


[ Parent ]
What do you think of the stimulus package? (0.00 / 0)
is it progressive as a concept?

No (0.00 / 0)
We have to see what is in the stimulus package, first, before any judgments can be made. However, that Summers is writing it is not a positive.

Bush had a jobs stimulus package back in 2003. It was a bunch of tax cuts. The stimulus concept is not, in and of itself, progressive.


[ Parent ]
Obama's plan is not a series of tax cuts (0.00 / 0)
I think he's made that clear, but I may be wrong. If I am, please show me where he has expressed this as the basis of the stimulus package.

So, let me rephrase- is the stimulus package, if it's not a series of tax cuts, progressive? If not, what would you consider a progressive approach to the economic issues facing us?



[ Parent ]
Pelosi Progressive? (4.00 / 1)
I sure don't think so.  She signed up for more trade deals and Obama voted for them and on the outsourcing/insourcing front Democrats are determined to push through more guest worker Visas, especially the ones targeting Science & Technology Professionals.  The $700 Billion dollar bail out with absolutely no solid conditions?  I could go on and on.

Rep. Marcy Kaptur lost big time to get a real Progressive in leadership.  So, from what I can see we've made huge gains in Progressives and Populists but the power is the same ole, same ole, with the exception of Waxman.

NoSlaves.com  


The Economic Populist


Pelosi is a progressive (4.00 / 2)
Pelosi is a progressive in the literal sense: she was a member of the Progressive caucus before she became minority leader (leaders are expected to drop out of whatever ideological caucuses they are in). She also has the #18 lifetime vote ranking on progressive punch, and was on Waxman's side during his fight.

If Pelosi isn't a progressive, then I think your definition is a bit narrow.


[ Parent ]
well maybe not my issues then (0.00 / 0)
Sorry, but global labor arbitrage is one of the things coming back to bite the United States right at this moment on that score, she gets an F grade.  

I don't think my definition is narrow, although I do believe the term Progressive has been hijacked for a lot of corporate, globalist like agendas.

A Progressive doesn't push through corporate lobbyist agendas that are guaranteed to labor arbitrage workers and if that's not part of the definition...well, what the hell is the point?

NoSlaves.com  


The Economic Populist


[ Parent ]
Well, the stimulus package (4.00 / 2)
at least judging by early reports seems to be one of the bright spots for progressives. It was will be large--perhaps even ha-yooge, with a focus on infrastructure and relief to homeowners, it looks like.

In a cruel irony the crisis is something of a blessing, because it would lead neo-liberals like Summers to dispatch with their harmful fiscal austerity. Everyone who calls herself a Democrat agrees that the economy need a big jolt.

That said, there still may be ways in which the plan is structured that are too favorable to Wall Street and corporations--time will tell.

In any case, I suspect that the harmful influence of Summers will be felt later on, after the stimulus package.


Is healthcare plan (0.00 / 0)
among other plans regarding the economy and potentially pushing the Big 3 auto companies into a negotiated bankruptcy aren't progressive ? What of the people he selected to handle health care, and his willingness now to accept mandates? is that progressive?

[ Parent ]
This is certainly true (0.00 / 0)
While Larry Summers did not become Treasury Secretary, it doesn't feel like a victory given the enormous power he has been granted anyway:

I think Summers will have more power than Geithner, not least because he used to be Geither's boss.  


Will there be a single ... (4.00 / 1)
...non-neoliberal on the NEC? Will there be a single anti-imperialist on the National Security Council? Once again, getting opinions from across the spectrum seems to be contingent on lopping off left-progressives.

But no matter. I'm told these appointments don't matter because Obama will be in charge. And, anyway, no policies have been decided on yet. So save my criticism for after the Inaugural, after the first Hundred Days, after the first term, after the historians have made their judgments.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox