Obama's Popularity Not Altering Legislative Outlook Yet

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Dec 11, 2008 at 16:58


Here is something I hinted at in the previous post on Obama's soaring popularity. While Obama is personally very popular, this popularity has not, as of yet, altered the legislative outlook on some key priorities. For example, Republican resistance to the auto bailout remains strong in the Senate:

The prospects of a $14 billion government rescue of the American auto industry seemed to vaporize Thursday as the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, spoke out forcefully against the bill, effectively ending its chances despite the urgings of the White House.

Looks like we are going have to have to wait until at least January 6th, when the new Congress is sworn in, to have a shot at passing any sort of auto industry bailout. Hopefully, at that time Democrats will decide to drop all of the concessions they made to Bush on the bailout, and just present a new bill for Obama to sign on January 20th.

Even if an auto bailout bill is passed either sometime this month or next month, it still won't be very popular. While different question wording on the auto bailout has produced some wildly different results from poll to poll, not a single poll has shown the auto industry bailout reaching even 50% support. Further, the recent Pew poll shows that the opposition is non-partisan in nature. Only 45% of Democrats, 38% of Independents, and 31% of Republicans think that it is the "right thing for government to spend billions of dollars to make loans to automakers to help keep them in business."

The bottom line is this: a highly popular Obama is nice, but it is ultimately meaningless from a governing perspective if that popularity fails increase support for his planned legislation or break Republican opposition to it. In this instance, Democrats made a large number of concessions to Republicans, thus ending opposition from the White House, but public opinion remains mixed and Republican Senate opposition remains strong enough to prevent passage anyway. If Obama's popularity is to have any substantive meaning for Democrats and progressives, it needs to be translated into increased support for imperiled Democratic and progressive legislation among both the public and members of Congress. While I am fully aware that he is not yet in office, and thus his role is somewhat limited, hopefully President-elect, and President Obama will have more success in these areas in the coming weeks and months.

Chris Bowers :: Obama's Popularity Not Altering Legislative Outlook Yet

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Obama hasn't really put his foot in the water... (0.00 / 0)
...with the bailout just yet.  He knows that the lame duck congress was iffy in possibly passing something, and he didn't want to get too involved.

Now, come January 20th, if he's still into saving the midwest.... well, he can go on tour if he wants to sell his vision of a $50 billion loan package with a czar tied to greener cars...  He would definitely be able to sell it, and I bet the approval numbers for the legislation would go up dramatically.

It really all depends on him... but, at this point, he really hasn't thrown himself into the mix and probably won't...  he just doesn't have enough influence or power at this time.

I'm afraid that its going to be too late by the time he gets into office, though...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


From a tactical viewpoint (0.00 / 0)
Can we agree that it makes sense for Obama to wait until he's been inaugurated before exerting much overt pressure for any particular legislation?

I assume that he will have to exert pressure soon thereafter, but also figure that there is little to be gained by doing so before he is in office.

Timing matters, right?

And this is my excuse to note Obama's reputation as a poker player: tight and aggressive.  In other words, be selective about fights, but when you get involved, do so aggressively.  


Agreed (0.00 / 0)
I see why Chris wants to read stuff into this bailout deal, but IMO judging his legislative agenda before he is inaugurated (on a piece of legislation that might not even be part of his preferred agenda in its specifics!) is jumping the gun a bit.

[ Parent ]
Yes .. but ... (0.00 / 0)
we have a Hoover/Roosevelt thing going on here .. and if Obama doesn't take the bull by the horns .. so to speak .. things might be a lot worse once he takes office than they are now .. most people here now know who Roubini is .. do any of you know who Meredith Whitney is?  She's been pretty spot on so far .. and she predicts a lot more hard times ahead .. including the big banks holding out their hands to the government for a lot more $$$

[ Parent ]
well, as far as the senate goes (0.00 / 0)
There is a big difference in the number of Republicans needed once the new year comes around.  It's hard to see the current situation as representative of next year's.

New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.

Dragging them in (0.00 / 0)
Presidents and even Presidential candidates traditionally campaign down the stretch in states with close House and Senate races.  Heavy Obama campaigning /expending down the stretch in Minnesots for example would have been interpreted (perhaps wrongly) as meaning that Al Franken owed his seat to Barack Obama.

We really didn't have thast this year and in many districts even a heavy Obama win didn't seem to translate into coat tails.  PA-6 and PA-15 are good examples of this but so is NJ-7. In PA-5, our candidate ran well ahead of Obama in his home county and well behind him in neighboring Centre County.

Obama's strength in the previous bail out was obvious: he was able to pull in a fair number of the more conservative members of the Congressional Black Caucus.  That might consistently get him another 8 to 10 votes in the House but won't help at all in the Senate.

A decent economy will blow out the weakest of the GOP senators in the last cycle with a Republican majority.  Another five to eight Senate seats will make a hige difference even if we are faced with a troglodyte minority of 35 Tom Coburns and Mitch McConnells.  Another 10 House seats would also make things much easier.  Try California, Pennsylvania, Michigan, New Jersey,and Ohio for those seats.


Please don't call it a bailout (0.00 / 0)
Horrible language.  Recovery plan or maybe Rescue Plan.  

Saxby Chambliss  

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox