The New Purpose of Fox News

by: Matt Stoller

Fri Dec 26, 2008 at 17:01


Here's Karl Rove, bragging about Bush's literary tastes.

Mr. Bush's 2006 reading list shows his literary tastes. The nonfiction ran from biographies of Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Carnegie, Mark Twain, Babe Ruth, King Leopold, William Jennings Bryan, Huey Long, LBJ and Genghis Khan to Andrew Roberts's "A History of the English Speaking Peoples Since 1900," James L. Swanson's "Manhunt," and Nathaniel Philbrick's "Mayflower." Besides eight Travis McGee novels by John D. MacDonald, Mr. Bush tackled Michael Crichton's "Next," Vince Flynn's "Executive Power," Stephen Hunter's "Point of Impact," and Albert Camus's "The Stranger," among others.

Here's Timothy Noah in Slate.

Turning to the Bush clan, we learn in Kitty Kelley's book The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty that New Yorker writer Brendan Gill was once a guest of George H.W. and Barbara Bush at their summer house in Kennebunkport, Maine. Stumbling through the place late at night in search of something to read, the only volume he could find was The Fart Book.

I sort of understand Rove's strategy of insisting that George W. Bush is an intellectual heavyweight, even though he's obviously just a dolt that loves fart jokes.  Rove enjoys tweaking liberals by preying on their insecurities, which he used to do when he was powerful and the Bush administration was taken seriously by insisting that they were effete eggheads out of touch with the real America.  Only, now, there's nothing whatsoever admirable about the Bush Presidency and no one really believes Rove is a political genius, and so Rove is reduced to pretending that Bush is some sort of bookworm.  Take that, liberals!  Or something like that.

I think someone should establish a musty hospice for the careers of dated political operatives, and stick Rove there.  Oh wait, an embarrassing political attic already exists, and it's called Fox News.

Matt Stoller :: The New Purpose of Fox News

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The All-Too-Comparable Intellectuality of Bush and Obama (0.00 / 1)
Since I think George W. Bush deserves to be hanged for supervising the genocidal occupation of Iraq, it's a little strange that I feel a sudden impulse to defend him against the relatively minor charge of not reading.

But I don't see any reason to doubt Karl Rove's story about the contest between him and Bush to see who would read the most books in a year.

Karl Rove says Bush read 40 books last year. Why is this incredible? He doesn't drink. He's over 60 years old. What do you think he does at night? Bowl? Play video games?

It's interesting to contrast the left's acceptance of Obama as an intellectual titan, compared to writing off Bush as sub-normal.

This is the same Obama who never tried a case as a "lawyer" or published a scholarly article of any kind as a "professor." His only literary production was a made-for-Oprah fictionalized autobiography designed to capitalize on the "distinction" of winning a student election as president of the Harvard Law Review. When he gets pushed off a script on a teleprompter or a few infinitely rehearsed talking-points, Obama isn't much more fluent than Bush, as he demonstrated again and again in the Democratic primary debates.

I don't have any particular reason to doubt that George W. Bush read 40 books last years, and neither has Matt Stoller. This article is far below his usual high standards as a political commenter, and only deserves notice as an example of blatantly partisan double standards.


"He doesn't drink." (4.00 / 1)
Oh, really?

George W. Bush was denied admission.... (0.00 / 0)
to the University of Texas' School of Law.

Not so dated (4.00 / 1)
Rove is orchestrating the Republican strategy to torpedo the Eric Holder nomination:  

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/...

We patronize him at our peril.


"The Stranger" (0.00 / 0)
Gee, I'm just trying to picture W walking around the Crawford ranch with his nose buried in a novel by Camus.

LOL...

Now, I guess with his permanent vacation coming up he'll have a chance to really sink his teeth into "Being and Nothingness", or maybe he'll learn French and read Sarter's "Nausea" in the original.  


The difference between L'Étranger and L'Être et le néant (0.00 / 0)
Rove claims Bush read The Stranger, which appears on thousands of high-school reading lists in places like Huntsville, Alabama. It isn't really comparable to Being and Nothingness.

[ Parent ]
If a Tree Falls in a Forest........... (0.00 / 0)
When Draper was interviewing Draper for "Dead Certain", Bush said that there was no point in asking him about a particular book that he had read because three weeks later he didn't have any specific memories about the book.  So if he read 40 books, or 400, and had no specific memories of any of them, what difference does it make whether he read them?

A Word of Advice (4.00 / 1)
I don't know if it is true that Bush read 40 books in 2006.  I do know that using Kitty Kelley as an authoritative source does not give the impression of intellectuality that you crave on this site.  You may as well quote the National Enquirer on the recent Elvis sightings, as it has an equal amount of legitimacy.

It is dangerous for a national candidate to say things that people might remember.
 - Eugene McCarthy


I Remember That When Rove First Met Bush, (4.00 / 2)
he was impressed by his ability to burp the entire alphabet.  Truly a Renaissance Man, our President.

Reading or not reading isn't the problem. (4.00 / 1)
It is his total lack of intellectual curiousity that's the problem.  He doesn't think.  Anyone who doesn't think, anticipate, plan, analyze is simply following god's plan.  

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox