Obama EPA delivers blow to coal

by: Populista

Sat Jan 24, 2009 at 13:31


Yesterday the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) delivered a big blow to the proposed Big Stone II plant and a huge victory for our climate and environment.

Just as a little backgrounder, Big Stone II is a proposed coal plant in South Dakota that would provide power to Minnesota, South Dakota and North Dakota. All these states have huge wind power potential but Big Stone II would commit us to dirty energy for generations. Here's a longer factsheet. It's a terrible idea but seemed to be heading towards approval, until today.

Populista :: Obama EPA delivers blow to coal
You can read for yourself the EPA ruling (PDFs: Part 1, Part 2). Environmental groups Clean Water Action and the Sierra Club are exited about a big victory. This does not end the fight but it is a significant blow to Big Stone II.

-In November the South Dakota Board of Minerals and Environment issued Big Stone II an air quality permit, then it sent that to the EPA for review.

-The EPA found 3 areas of the permit that were not consistent with the requirements of the Clean Air Act.

-South Dakota now gets 90 days to change the permit and then the EPA has 45 days after that to review the permit again.

- The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission approved transition lines for Big Stone II last week.

-Minnesota law requires that new power lines for a coal plant can only be approved when the applicant (usually a utility) proves that that costs less than using renewable energy or energy efficiency or some combination of the two.

-If the permit is changed and accepted by the EPA it would likely raise the cost of the project. It would almost certainly change the cost.  So according to MPR awesome local green group Fresh Energy plans to ask the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission to reconsider last weeks decision.

Her group will ask the PUC to reconsider its power line permit for Big Stone II. Taylor says the increased costs of the plant because of the air permit issue will be one of the issues the group raises. It's possible the plant's energy will cost more than renewables like wind power, she says.

In short, this is a big set back for Big Stone II and a big victory for environmental advocates but the fight is far from over. It does signal however that the EPA under President Obama (still feels amazing writing that) will be taking a much harder look at proposed coal plants then they did during the Bush era. That coupled with Obama's "green dream team" and recent stimulus developments are very good for anyone who cares about the future of our planet.

Cross posted from the Minnesota Progressive Project


Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thanks for keeping us posted (4.00 / 1)
This is the kind of thing that doesn't make headlines but is a real sign of change.  The Bush EPA would likely have rubber-stamped that permit.  I'm relieved to see that the administration is taking these things seriously, because given some of Obama's campaign language pitching "clean coal" and corn-based ethanol as solutions to global warming I was seriously skeptical of his commitment to climate change issues.  I'd still like to see Obama embrace a moratorium on new coal plants as a matter of policy, not to mention a carbon tax, but this is certainly encouraging.

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox