This ain't the 1930s because there is no radical left

by: Adrian

Wed Feb 04, 2009 at 01:49


As OpenLefties know, many progressives are comparing the current economic situation to the 1930s. While the hardships of this recession do not (yet) compare with what our country faced in the Great Depression, there is no question that these are tough times.

The idea that we are reliving the Depression or something like it is part of a larger argument that the U.S. is undergoing a leftward political realignment similar to that of the '30s. The hope is that the Democratic Party will rediscover its New Deal heritage and a new progressive coalition will come together around issues of health care, income inequality, corporate power, etc.

However, even if we assume that Barack Obama and his allies are potential New Dealers with good progressive instincts (and I don't assume anything of the sort), we should recognize that the political landscape of today is missing many of the forces and actors that made the Roosevelt era so ripe for change.

In the 1930s, the possibility that American society would be upended by a genuine social revolution, while probably very remote, was a real fear of some people.  As FDR put it: "I was convinced we'd have a revolution in [the] US and I decided to be its leader and prevent it. I'm a rich man too and have run with your kind of people. I decided half a loaf was better than none - a half loaf for me and a half loaf for you and no revolution." Roosevelt was half-bullshitting as politicians always do, but there was some truth to that statement.

Consider the times:

In those years, Huey Long, a terrifyingly ambitious populist from alligator-haunted Louisiana, had the political establishment (and many on the left) shitting bricks with his crusade to radically restructure the American economy.

During this same period, important sectors of the labor movement advanced an explicitly anti-capitalist line. Also, many prominent artists and intellectuals affiliated with the Communist Party, or with Trotskyism, or with the Socialist Party of Norman Thomas.  

Left-wing newspapers developed respectable circulations and wide appeal, with sports pages, comics and all. Homeless people, tenants, farmers and other burdened groups organized themselves into associations and managed to cause considerable trouble.  

Today we have to ask ourselves, where is our radical labor movement? Where is our EPIC? Where is our Farmer Labor Party? Where is our Daily Worker? Where is our Huey Long?

Maybe the social conditions of this economic downturn will produce similar anti-systemic left/populist movements, but right now I don't see anybody arguing for anything beyond the mild liberalism of MoveOn. I'm all for MoveOn and we'd be lucky to get the MoveOn agenda realized, but I believe progressive politics is the art of backing up maximalist demands with credible threats ... and MoveOn isn't nearly scary or threatening enough for the task at hand.  

Adrian :: This ain't the 1930s because there is no radical left

Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Media Media Media! (4.00 / 1)
In the 1930's there was a feeble little thing called radio that sat in the living room and left a lot to the imagination. Now we have a brain-nullifying array of total media, supplying cacaphonic propaganda for passivity and consumerism.

Your nostalgia for little leftie newspapers is right on the mark, but now all newspapers are disappearing, replaced by high-definition, high-investment franchises that little lefties can't afford to start up.

When FDR was elected, talking movies were 5 years old... The Jazz Singer appeared in 1927, and almost every adult in the United States had spent his or her life in a media universe that almost none of us can even imagine. Most Americans still lived on farms, and if you wonder what happened to the Farmer Labor Party, maybe you haven't noticed that there are no farmers, one half of one percent of the population, with the remainder transformed into clerks in cubicles, with no knowledge of anything much beyond the walls of their cubicles except what they see and hear in total corporate media.

The internet has parasitized the few remaining newspapers for news, and what will it find to talk about when the last few professional reporters fade away?

Who covers your local courthouse?

Nobody.

Who covered financial markets before the meltdown, beyond reciting the talking-points kindly provided by bank speculators?

Nobody.

Who investigates anything in the real world?

Nobody, and especially not all the internet "researchers" whose idea of research is pasting in a link from the New York Times.

If you want a radical left that's a little more than disconnected atoms of discontent, then drive, walk, or run down to your local TV franchise, and...

Use your imagination!


Thank you (0.00 / 0)
This is a point often overlooked.  My fear is that today's social movement is actually the right-wing palinites and that those are the ones who will have actual success pushing an agenda from the outside.  

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox