Why Is Bank of America Blaming the Financial Crisis on Dead Mothers?

by: ZP Heller

Sat Feb 07, 2009 at 19:49


How do you know when your bank is standing in the way of economic recovery?  Well, take the following quiz.  Your bank took $45 billion in bailout funds and:
a) Blew it on an overseas bank investment, DC lobbyists, corporate jets, executive bonuses, and a lavish Super Bowl party worth $10 million alone.
b) Announced it would lay off 35,000 workers while refusing to provide adequate health care for the rest of its 212,000 employees.
c) Asked participants on a conference call to donate large sums of money to vulnerable anti-union Senatorial candidates in order to defeat the Employee Free Choice Act.
d) Blamed the financial crisis on dead mothers.
e) All of the above.

Sadly, for Bank of America, the answer is "e" as in "egregious."  TPMMuckraker had a story Friday about Theresa Hatt, a Bank of America customer who died of cancer last month at 52.  When her son, Paul Kelleher, called Bank of America to let them know, an estates representative asked if Kelleher intended to pay off the balance of his mother's credit card.  When he said he wasn't obligated to, the representative said, "I know that if it were my mother, I'd pay it. That's why we're in the banking crisis we're in: banks having to write off defaulted loans."

Apparently, Bank of America instructs representatives from its collections unit to deceive customers intentionally, both about the legality of paying off balances and obviously about the morality of it as well.  Not only that, but the bank also rewards its reps who do bring in "collectible money" with fat bonuses of upwards of $5,000 a month.  This is a business practice so sickening it ought to have every Bank of America customer shredding their ATM cards in disgust.

ZP Heller :: Why Is Bank of America Blaming the Financial Crisis on Dead Mothers?
If anything, Bank of America ought to be just that: a bank of America.  Considering we gave the bank $45 billion in taxpayer money, it ought to be beholden to each and every taxpayer, not shamelessly guilting people into paying off the balances on their deceased mothers' credit cards.  The SEIU wants Bank of America to fire its CEO Ken Lewis, and that's a good place to start demanding accountability.  They want the nation's largest bank to begin using its bailout billions to resuscitate the economy, which is what that money was intended for all along.  But the window of opportunity seems to be closing, as Bank of America's corporate practices become more contemptable by the day.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Did these people back in 1970 know ... (4.00 / 1)
...something we don't:




I quit them long ago (4.00 / 3)
I had switched to a local credit union about a year ago when I found out that BofA was one of the largest investors in mining companies that use mountain top removal techniques, but this should shame anyone into switching to a local credit union.
 

this pretty much seals it (4.00 / 3)
i have to move my money to the local credit union.  not that ill be draining all their cash on hand, but its the principle that counts.

credit cards (4.00 / 2)
My credit card is Working Assets, which used to use MBNA, and transferred over to BofA when they bought MBNA.  I've always been ambivalent about it.  Why isn't there a non-evil credit card servicing company for good-guy credit cards like Working Assets that aren't themselves banks so need to have someone else do their cards?

boa has (0.00 / 0)
probably has hundreds of thousands of employees. it's not a mom and pop operation. that statement - even if true - does not prove that it's bank policy. also, companies often try to make people pay debt for which they have no legal obligation to pay. even if it's your own debt, if the statute of limitations has passed, just ignore them....i think it's absolutely unfair to hold people to promises to pay debt that didn't have to pay, but i don't think it's a sin to ask....there's a whole line of court cases on this issue. courts take a strict rule if you are paying someone elses debt - get it in writing.....but it's not criminal activity to ask....of course, i'm thinking of this outside of a sensationalized setting like "dead mother"....

and: " it ought to be beholden to each and every taxpayer" - absolutely not. banks are taxpayers; so are corporations; so is donald trump. absolutely not.  


TPM clearly pointed out that this IS a bank policy... (4.00 / 2)
and that bank employess are held accountable for collecting as much as possible, no ethical limits applied. And the relatives of a deceased bank customer shouldn't be put under aditional emotional strain in this way by a bank employee. That's totally unethical, and there should be regulations prohibiting the exploit of pschological vulnerable persons in such a way.

As for "banks are taxpayers", sry, but I'm under the impression that almost all major banks recently published losses, not profits, so what taxes do they still pay? Not to speak of that those corps are experts in avoding taxes, and even in good years do not nearly pay the nominal corporate tax rate on their profits. Imho it's a safe guess that those banks are really net recipients of taxes (in the from of bailout moneys) right now, and not contributers.


[ Parent ]
This is the sort of company (0.00 / 0)
that can easily be boycotted by people offended by this kind of behaviour.  Close any accounts and rip up any credit cards
you have from them, and let them know why.  

If you got even a small percentage of the people who voted for Obama to boycott, these fragile institutions would get the message fast.


this is a devastating story (0.00 / 0)
Added to things like terrorist money laundering, yeah, I try to avoid them.

I do want to correct one zombie lie on our side, however: BoA did not throw a $10M Super Bowl party.  As the original ABC News story makes clear, BoA has a $10M, three-year overall sponsorship deal with the league -- franchise-themed credit cards and the like.  Acting as the sponsor of this five-day fan event was on top of that, and certainly nowhere near a $10M expense.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox