Stimulus Goodies

by: Chris Bowers

Fri Feb 13, 2009 at 12:30


With the stimulus legislation finally released to the public (read a summary of the bill here), and with Congress expected to pass the bill today or tomorrow, let's look at some of the goodies we are discovering about the bill today. In all of the areas where we had focused our attentions at Open Left--Buy America provisions, executive compensation, transportation funding and net neutrality--there was good news at the end of the process. Plus, the political situation improved in at least two ways, as well.

Details in the extended entry.

Chris Bowers :: Stimulus Goodies

  1. Senator Dodd's executive pay limits stayed in the final bill: Senator Chris Dodd vowed to take back the executive bonuses for banks receiving TARP money, and it appears that he has succeeded in doing just that. His executive pay amendment to the stimulus, which I reproduced here, has made it into the final legislation, according to Elana Schor.

  2. Mass transit funding significantly increased: Remember when we were worried about the lack of mass transit funding in the stimulus package, and worked to increase funding from $10 billion to $13 billion? Well, it turns out that the final stimulus bill provides at least $17.7 billion for mass transit, due to $8 billion for high-speed rail SUPERTRAINS that came in at the end. This is a real success!

  3. Buy American and Anti-Outsourcing provisions included: Another aspect of the stimulus package we have been following closely here on Open Left are the Buy America and anti-outsourcing provisions President Obama promised to include in the stimulus. As David reported early today, those promises have been fulfilled..

  4. Net Neutrality in the Stimulus bill: As I reported yesterday, there had been fears about anti-network neutrality language being inserted into the job stimulus package during the conference report. That, however, didn't happen. There are still concerns that only part of the broadband spending in the stimulus are covered by net neutrality language, although that is still as murky as it was two weeks ago. Harold Feld has more on what the stimulus package does, and does not do, for broadband access and net neutrality.

  5. Representative Clyburn requires states to spend money in 45 days: Representative Clyburn managed to insert a provision into the stimulus that will not only help the bill stimulate the economy faster, but which will put Republicans in a awkward political position:

    A devilishly clever last-minute insert to the House version of the stimulus bill has made it through the conference report -- a requirement that governors spend their stimulus allocations within 45 days.

    The provision isn't likely to have a real-world impact, but it forces Republican governors who opposed the stimulus (e.g. South Carolina's Mark Sanford)  and many other GOP governors who sat on the fence for fear of bucking their party -- to publicly accept or decline the aid. And when they do accept it -- and it's hard to see a scenario where they wouldn't given their deficits --  Democrats get to call them craven or hypocritical or both.

  6. Stimulus support rises as President Obama campaigns for it: To top it off, the stimulus package has become more popular over the last week as well. The same numbers are seen across Gallup, Democracy Corps, and Rasmussen.
All in all, despite the cuts, a lot of good stuff happened toward the end of the stimulus package process. Later today, debcoop will provide a report on what the stimulus package will do for one state, with her example being New York. Also, fladem has an excellent chart comparing the originally proposed stimulus to the final version.

All around, I am feeling pretty good right now. Despite the cuts, this is still a real victory. And, as I have been saying, let's make sure that this is just a starting point from which our legislative and political prospects only improve.


Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Stimulus Goodies | 19 comments
doesn't #5 mean they'll use it to pay down their deficits, (0.00 / 0)
and not on things that might be desperately needed more, but would take more than that time -- like their actual bidding and contracting processes/laws?

states have to balance budgets (0.00 / 0)
so that money will be used in most states to avoid drastic cuts that would have hurt real people and created a cascading effect in our economy.

[ Parent ]
Here in CA (4.00 / 2)
That money will go out the door IMMEDIATELY. There are many public works projects that were halted because of the deficit and could be restarted.

[ Parent ]
CA -- State eyes $10 billion in stimulus for budget (0.00 / 0)
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/...

... California state budget officials hope to use as much as $10 billion from the looming federal stimulus package to avoid borrowing money to offset the state's gaping $42 billion deficit.

A budget deal being finalized Thursday between Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders still would include deep spending cuts and temporary tax increases, officials said....



[ Parent ]
i know -- using it for that tho, (0.00 / 0)
means that they won't/can't use it for other things (job creation things as opposed to plugging deficit), and it would be spent on current deficits -- not 2010 or any others -- if economic forecasts are right, they'll be in deficit again next budget too.

like -- NYS and NYC both have enormous (in the billions for each) deficits (other cities and towns do too). And the state is also borrowing to pay unemployment, and for other required services as well.  


[ Parent ]
So what? (0.00 / 0)
As of the moment, we are paying off the state-level deficits by cutting services, or laying off government workers. How are these options a good or acceptable situation?  This "transfers" the debt to the government entity that can legally run a deficit; the Federal Government, and gets it off the backs of the states that are, ore often than not, forced to balance their budgets.


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
why do republicans vote for CHAOS ??? (4.00 / 1)
because only chaos will allow their crimes to go uninvestigated and unpunished, culminating with the death of the party. When all is at stake, all is 'fair'
  RIP beverly eckert : one 9/11 truther down,
  ???? to go...

Unemployment insurance expanded... (4.00 / 1)
to care for sick relatives, thanks to Jim McDermott.

I am in earnest -- I will not equivocate -- I will not excuse -- I will not retreat a single inch -- AND I WILL BE HEARD.  

Here is the headline in the ST Pete Times (4.00 / 5)
$4.3 Billion is a big relief here.  

The state's stimulus share is still a bit unclear, but it's looking "very, very encouraging" Gov Crist says.  

Also, the headline in the local section of the St Pete Times:
Crist taking heat from GOP

I have no doubt that Crist wants to be President.  I have no doubt he thinks he should have been on the ticket with McCain.  His support of the stimulus package strikes me a more than significant.  The article I link to suggests significant anger on the right with his support.  The fact that he so openly supported the package is interesting on multiple levels.


the GOP would nominate a closet-case? (0.00 / 0)
never. never. never.

[ Parent ]
I agree with him... (0.00 / 0)
He would have been better for McCain on that ticket... much much better.  Good thing McCain was stupid.

[ Parent ]
none of it will create jobs or stimulute the economy (0.00 / 1)
regardless if this stuff is "good" in terms of policy, it doesn't do the purpose of fixing what is broken.
The thesis of this spending is that money will be liquid, but it will just pool upwardly to the owners of businesses who get the grants.
Also, this spending does nothing to increase GDP.

not joking (0.00 / 0)
government grants are not awarded to bidders who do not have the ability to begin a project immediately.

the construction contractors who will be awarded these grants will not need new labor. (and the existing labor they have is paid the lowest with no benefits)

so the majority of this money will go to the pockets of the owners after the cost of supplies and materials.


[ Parent ]
And how does this not increase the GDP? (0.00 / 0)
Companies getting new contracts that they otherwise wouldn't have got sure increases the GDP. And even the job situation will improve because of this, because especially construction companies would otherwise lay off a lot of workers in this recession. so, many jobs are secured by this measure now, and even some additional jobs will certainly be created by the larger project. Sry, but I think your criticism is much too one one-sided.  

[ Parent ]
As it turns out... (0.00 / 0)
I admit I am always doubting and questioning, but it appears that this picture is still relevant.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com...

Our Dime Understanding the U.S. Budget

I've been reminded of that picture as well (4.00 / 1)

I don't actually buy into this concept.  We need to create as much operating space to the left as possible.  But still, it seems to capture the moment.


[ Parent ]
barack gets his credit for getting the stimulus bill passed (0.00 / 0)
as I promised last week

[ Parent ]
Rep George Miller on Ed Schultz today (4.00 / 2)
Talking about the big increase in education money, Rep Miller, CA 07, stressed that it was going to Education Programs, like Title I, not to the Governors' offices to be skimmed off, or parceled out as they saw fit. Asked if he'd been able to read the legislation, Miller scoffed back that he'd been WRITING IT for the past two weeks. Then Ed had a good laugh! They contrasted this with Bush's unfunded $70 billion No Child Left Behind broken promises.

Stimulus Goodies | 19 comments
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox