|So, here's the run-down. Hypocrisy in the ground state, taking credit for a bill they voted against--along with every other Republican voting:
Rep. John Mica was gushing after the House of Representatives voted Friday to pass the big stimulus plan.
"I applaud President Obama's recognition that high-speed rail should be part of America's future," the Florida Republican beamed in a press release.
Yet Mica had just joined every other GOP House member in voting against the $787.2 billion economic recovery plan.
Republicans echoed their party line over and over during the debate: "This bill is loaded with wasteful deficit spending on the majority's favorite government programs," as Minority Whip Eric Cantor, R-Va., put it.
But Mica wasn't alone in touting what he saw as the bill's virtues. Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, also had nice things to say in a press release.
Young boasted that he "won a victory for the Alaska Native contracting program and other Alaska small business owners last night in H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act."
Next, taking credit for bipartisan 'working with members on the other side of the aisle' even though he voted against them:
One provision would have made it harder for minority businesses to win contracts, and Young explained that he "worked with members on the other side of the aisle to make the case for these programs, and was able to get the provision pulled from the bill."
And being for earmarks (even though he couldn't get them) while railing against them (in the more generic form of "pet projects."
Yet later in the day Young - who recently told McClatchy that he would've included earmarks, or local projects, in the bill if it had been permitted - issued another statement blasting the overall measure.
"This bill was not a stimulus bill. It was a vehicle for pet projects, and that's wrong," he protested.
Of course, even the uber-pork "Bridge to Nowhere" would have had a stimulative effect on the economy, so that last passage is in itself a headspinning twofer.
And there's this added twist on top:
Young wouldn't return a request for comment on the apparent contradiction of his press releases.
The quiet blowhard!
In fact, two of them!
Mike Steel, a spokesman for House GOP Leader John Boehner of Ohio, at first ducked when asked about Mica and Young issuing press releases praising the bill they'd opposed.
"I don't work for Mica or Young," Steel said initially.
How many boneheaded Mike Steels does the GOP have? And how do they tell them apart?
Ooops! Another contradiction here, as Steel decides, well, whatever. Maybe he doesn't decide anything. Maybe his compulsions just got the better of him. Anyway, now he's offering an "explantion":
But then he explained that what Mica and Young did in touting aspects of the bill was in fact consistent with the Republican message.
"Being supportive of one portion of a trillion dollar bill, but voting against the entire trillion dollar bill, is perfectly reasonable," Steel said.
And surprisingly enough, there's nothing hypocritical about the explanation. For a Republican it is perfectly reasonable to be a bad faith actor. In fact, if they weren't bad faith actors, they wouldn't be Republicans.
Mica is the top Republican on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, and a longtime backer of high-speed rail. GOP committee spokesman Justin Harclerode explained that Mica saw the bill's $8 billion for rail as a "silver lining," and "he's encouraged others are supporting high speed rail too."
But nowhere in the Young or Mica statements was any mention that they opposed the bill.
Harclerode wasn't sure why Mica didn't mention his opposition. "It's not really secret," he said. "I guess it just wasn't the focus."
No, of course not. His focus was on taking credit for something he tried his darnedest to stop.
As a parting treat, since you've all been so good in reading this far, here's a model of the structure of lies and hypocrisy touched on in this piece: