Former Felons May Regain Right to Vote in Country's Strictest States

by: project vote

Wed Feb 18, 2009 at 21:46


( - promoted by Daniel De Groot)

Cross-Posted at Project Vote's Voting Matter's Blog

Weekly Voting Rights News Update

by Erin Ferns

Hundreds of thousands of former felons may regain their voting rights in two of the country's most restrictive states this year. As predicted last month, disenfranchisement reform is an election issue that is quietly gaining momentum as policymakers in Virginia and Kentucky battle for restoration of voting rights.

project vote :: Former Felons May Regain Right to Vote in Country's Strictest States
The two states are currently the only states in the nation that permanently disenfranchise all felony offenders. Virginia, however, has permitted certain former felons to apply for restoration, which then has to be approved by the governor, according to the Virginian Pilot last week. With less than 10,000 Virginians having regained voting rights under the last four governorships and at least 297,901 still disenfranchised, it appears more has to be done. But it appears this will not be accomplished without a fight.

Last week, the Virginia Senate passed one measure and defeated another that would restore voting rights, the Pilot reported. Constitutional amendment SJ 273, a measure that would give the General Assembly "constitutional power to restore voting rights to non-violent felons," is now in the House. However, an arguably more effective measure "that would automatically restore voting rights once a felon completes their sentence and subsequent parole or probation" died on a 19-19 vote. "Republican Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, who presides in the Senate, broke the tie and voted against it."

Nationally, more than five million people are not allowed to vote as a result of a past felony conviction. Policies on felony re-enfranchisement among the 50 states are so inconsistent as to create confusion among, not only those former offenders who wish to regain the right to vote, but also the very officials charged with implementing the laws. Fair and consistent felony re-enfranchisement laws can contribute to the rehabilitation process, and reduce the harmful impact on low-income and minority communities where a disproportionately high number of individuals are disenfranchised due to felony convictions. With that, voting rights advocates are pushing for automatic post-incarceration restoration of voting rights, as we reported in last month's blog entry.

Under a system of automatic post-incarceration restoration of rights, "citizens released from prison would be immediately eligible to vote while on probation and parole, as are those who are sentenced to probation without serving any time in prison," according to a 2008 report by Erika Wood of the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. "These citizens would be permitted to register in precisely the same way as other eligible citizens, without submission of special paperwork."

"Restoring the right to vote to ex-offenders is an integral aspect of reintegration into society," according to a 2007 Project Vote report, which notes a disproportionate over-representation of low-income and minority citizens in the criminal justice system. "Consistent policies are necessary to prevent large-scale disenfranchisement not only of the ex-offenders themselves, but also of the communities to which they belong. Society as a whole benefits when a representative government truly represents all its citizens."

While the Virginia bill has support from both parties, it "must travel a difficult path to become law," the Pilot reports. "The first step is being approved by the Republican-controlled House of Delegates that has already killed similar proposals this year."

Another fight is expected in Kentucky, where as many as 186,000 former felons may be able to vote again if House Bill 70 "gets the support it needs from lawmakers," according to local broadcast news outlet, WHAS 11. The bill would amend state law that permanently disenfranchises all felony offenders to restore voting rights after completion of sentence. The bill is now in the Senate.

To monitor the progress of Virginia and Kentucky's felon voting rights bills, visit www.ElectionLegislation.org and sign up for the Election Legislation e-Digest by emailing a subscription request to eferns(at)projectvote.org.

Quick Links:

Statistics by State. Sentencing Project.

In Other News:

Ads against same-day voter registration hit TV - Santa Fe New Mexican
A Las Cruces political action committee is running ads on cable television warning viewers that bills allowing same-day voter registration would lead to vote fraud, including out-of-state people pouring in to cancel the vote of New Mexican citizens.
Voter ID bill referred to full Senate - Marshall News Messenger [Texas]
The controversial voter identification bill that triggered a Senate rules fight last month on Tuesday was referred directly to the full Senate for a vote.

Voter ID law fails to pass House committee - Minnesota Public Radio
St. Paul, Minn. - A Minnesota House panel has defeated a proposal to require voters to show photo ID before casting a ballot.  


Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
oklahoma (4.00 / 3)
There is also a similar bill in Oklahoma. But this state is run by right-wing nuts in the legislature so dont' get your hopes up.

they should vote (4.00 / 1)
You break the law you pay your debt, and your free, why should they pay a debt for the rest of their life, seems unconstitutional to begin with.

whatever you think people owe you, that is what you owe people

the fourteenth amendment (4.00 / 3)
section 2 of the fourteenth amendment allows states to strip felons of their voting rights without penalty (complicated analysis), which led southern states basically to criminalize blackness....i.e., heavily police, arrest, and convict black men of crimes to keep them from voting. the fact that most of the states who keep felons from voting ever again are southern is no accident.  

[ Parent ]
so it's this part? (4.00 / 2)
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.



New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.

[ Parent ]
Sorry - very late, but: (0.00 / 0)
yes- that part.  this provision (the complicated part) was designed to prevent the south from preventing blacks from voting.  it would strip them of representation in the house of representatives to the same degree that they denied blacks the right to vote (i.e., blacks would not count in the south's population for purposes of representation in congress/electoral votes). on the list of exceptions for this rule includes people convicted of a "crime."  

[ Parent ]
Florida and more (4.00 / 2)
Florida has more than twice as many people disenfranchised as Texas and leads the nation with 1,179,687.  Nearly a million of those are "ex-felons."  In fact, 46.5% of disenfranchised ex-felons live in Florida.  Republicans further exploited that recently by trying to disenfranchise non-felons in Florida with similar first and last names as felons.  How many Juan Rodriguezes, Joe Gonzalezes, or Willie Smiths live in Miami or Tampa?

Only mass fraud, mass intimidation and the legal disenfranchisement of over 1 million voters keeps the Republicans in the statewide game.

Btw, the 14th Amendment was meant to allow the disenfranchisement of former confederates but has only been used to disenfranchise the poor and minorities rather than the grandees who were colonels, generals, and elected confederate officials.

Twenty states limit disenfranchisement (if at all) to prison and jail and parole.  None are in the South.  These include all six New England states, IL, IN, MI, OH, CA and NY.


it says "other crime" (0.00 / 0)
I disagree with its usage, but the language is fairly clear, and that was the practice even before emancipation. but this does not change the fact that southern states do this in order to impact black votes or that it has a disparate impact. i believe that even if the authority is lawful, if it is done to discriminate on the basis of race or even if it has a race-based impact, it's unlawful (under the fourteenth amendnment or the voting rights act).  

[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search