My Mother And I Don't Leave

by: Bertha Lewis

Sat Feb 21, 2009 at 17:30


On Wednesday I wrote a piece on Huffington Post and another here at Open Left talking about the centrality of fixing the foreclosure crisis to any recovery from the economic meltdown. Since the toxic assets at the center of the meltdown are based on mortgages that are entering foreclosure at a rate of one every 13 seconds, we have to address foreclosure as a part of getting America back on its feet.  

The Homeowner Affordability and Stabilization Plan (HASP), announced in Phoenix on Wednesday by President Obama, which will help up to an estimated 9 million families, is a good first step – and the first serious effort by the Federal government to confront the challenge. But just because there was an announcement does not lessen the urgency of the problem. We are still in a situation where four families every minute enter the foreclosure process. We believe there must be a moratorium on foreclosures until HASP is fully implemented.  

In the extended entry I give a report back on ACORN's actions on Thursday to create a sense of urgency around this crisis and help some families stay in their homes.

Bertha Lewis :: My Mother And I Don't Leave

Thursday we launched the Home Defenders campaign in seven cities – a campaign to force the question of moratoriums and to press the urgency of this crisis into the consciousness of elected officials on the state and national levels. This is a campaign of refusal and resistance – refusal by distressed homeowners to cooperate with the foreclosure process and resistance to attempts to evict them from their homes. And in some cases it is a campaign of getting people back into their homes.  

I wanted to give everyone a report-back from our activities of this week.  

In Baltimore, ACORN member Donna Hanks re-took her home. Foreclosed on last Fall, the house has stood empty since then, a stark reminder of the failure of the system. But Donna joined with 30 ACORN Home Defenders to liberate her home from the bank. Her act of civil disobedience was covered by 2 radio stations, 2 TV stations, the Baltimore Sun, and the Huffington Post.  

 

Donna used bolt cutters to break the lock to the door and re-enter the home. Unfortunately, in the six short months since the home was seized, it has been extensively damaged, essentially partially gutted. The toilets are missing, and the upstairs ceiling is badly damaged. The greatest tragedy here is that Donna worked for months with ACORN sister organization ACORN Housing Corporation to try to get the bank to modify the loan so it could be affordable, but they refused, taking the home and now allowing it to be a haven for squatters and a target of looters.  

In Houston, where one in three homes sold in January was a foreclosure and foreclosure sales accounted for 34 percent of all homes sold - a 9-percent jump from the same time last year, Sara Chavez announced her refusal to leave here home. “My mother and I don't leave," she said.  A mother of three who cares for her sick mother, she has owned her house since 2004, but has seen her mortgage payment double from $1,000 to $2,000. She joined with ACORN Home Defenders to declare her neighborhoods a “Foreclosure Free Zone”.  

We even had a little star power come out to help the campaign to keep hard working families in their homes. In Los Angeles, comedienne Roseanne Barr traveled to Watts to join with Tommy and Debora Beard. The Beards are a teacher assistant and hospital cook who have lived in their home for over 20 years and have lost it to foreclosure in part due to a predatory loan. There is a possibility that allies in the legal community may be able to extend the Beards' eviction process for quite awhile to buy time get Chase to reverse the foreclosure, person after person (including Roseanne) pledged to "go to jail" with the Beards if necessary.  

There are other reports from Oakland, New York, and Orlando

As Mike Lux put it in the Huffington Post Friday:  

“The American family has to take care of each other, has to look out for each other, especially in the hard times, because the misery of our fellow citizens will spread to the rest of us.”

 Right on.  

This campaign is not just about helping hard working families keep their homes, it is fundamentally about saving the American Dream, about what makes us proud to call ourselves Americans, and about bit by bit making this country stronger.    

You can help by asking Congress not to give in to Wall Street and their coming attempts to block the most important aspects of HASP. If we want a new America we’re going to have to fight for it.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
This is yet another reason... (4.00 / 5)
Why Rick Santelli and the other CNBC "money honeys" totally get it wrong when they scream about "the 8% who try to cheat the system". These people who are losing their homes are mostly people who didn't "cheat the system", but rather people who were misled into junk mortgages. This isn't a problem of "black & brown welfare queens living on hard-working white folks" dime", but of unregulated financial institutions using these people to make fast money.

I agree that it's unfair for these people to lose their homes because of fraudulent acts committed by the banks, so I applaud you & ACORN for standing up for these truly hard-working working class people. Thanks.

Yes, Virginia, there are progressives in Nevada.


I agree about the urgency (0.00 / 0)
which is one reason I think doling out "incentives" to the same mortgage lenders who knowingly hard-sold unsustainable and unethical term packages to naive buyers is probably not the best way to go to solve the mortgage crisis.

Those bank and mortgage managers are idiots (4.00 / 2)
They know damn well that their "inventory" of foreclosed homes is already so large that it will take years after the prices stabilized to sell all those houses. They know that empty houses not only reduce the comps for the whole neighborhood, but will lose value rapidly, because of looting, vandalizing and aquatting. They know that another wave of ARMs will reset this year, leading to even more foreclosures. They know that the investors who hold all those mortgage papers are hurting because of liqidity drying up, and that even half a morgage payment would be better than nothing. And they know of the negative publicity for their institutions from every foreclosure case that goes public, like those of the Chavez' and the Beards.

And still they do nothing to prevent foreclosures if there is any chance? And they don't put foreclosured homes on the renting market as quick as they can? Madness! Where are the managers who act responsible for their customers, their companies, their investors, and the society at large? Where are the positive cases, where managers cut through the red tapes that are holding back and implement new ways of dealing with this huge problem? Is the sentiment that banks aren't landlords, and that established procedures should never change, so strong that it prevents every occurance of the once typical American "can do" spirit? Does stubborness and arrogance always prevail over reason?

If this is so, then the government must force those financial institutions to do the right thing. Implement a law that will make it mandatory for corporate houseowners to put uninhabited houses on the rental market after three months, at prices determined by regional averages. Make it mandatory that banks have to offer their customers a traditional mortgage plan, with a low interest only slightly above the rates that banks pay for lending money from the feds, fixed for at least five years. Implement a law that will allow communities to hold a real estate owner responsible if he lets his property become a public nuisance, with the option to make the house public domain if the owner doesn't cooperate.

It doesn't necessarily take billions to improve the situations of mortgage customers and the communities. Laws forcing the financial institutions to do the right thing would help a lot, too. It only takes the political will to change the rules of that game. Wouldn't that be change almost everybody can believe in?  


Right on (0.00 / 0)
Gary, I do not agree with your position on trade, but this piece is brilliant!

Government by organized money is just as dangerous as government by organized mob..... FDR

[ Parent ]
Thx! But this is just what I learned from all those mortgage blogs, (0.00 / 0)
for instance Irvinehousingblog.com. Of course, there's a lot of Schadenfreude about wannabe flipper that "caught a falling knife" by speculating with real estate in 2006 and 2007, too, but also lots of serious analyses on the background of the bubble, how ordinary people fell for the propaganda of the real estate industry, and what still lies ahead (more ARM resets), etc. And nobody there has any explanation how financial institutes will get out of trouble by simply sitting on growing inventories and letting houses turn into slum huts. If only those bank managers would read the blogs, and finally notice they have to try something different in those dire times!

As for the trade issue, well, even if we're occasionally holding different opinions, it shouldn't be forgotten that there's much more that bands us together, right?
:-)


[ Parent ]
I was at an ACORN event in June 2007 (0.00 / 0)
that was supposed to be a forum with the Mayor, but included as an intro an off-topic rant about the mortgage crisis. At first I was irritated by the exploitation of audience attention, but as I listened to the woman I had a greater understanding of just how heartbreaking this is for people. It's not just about losing your investment or your shelter, it's this:

it is fundamentally about saving the American Dream

As a conscientious objector to the cultural mandate that the American dream means owning a house/land, I can sympathize with the pain but also think it's a version of the American Dream that isn't worth saving. I support ACORN's efforts to keep people in their homes because the entire system is horribly wasteful right now. It makes me angry that banks not only exploited people's lack of financial sophistication and abused their trust, but that they exploited this dream - this idea that to have truly achieved the dream you must own your home. How many bubbles must we go through before we question the notion that owning a home is security? How long before we can shake the cultural legacy of landed gentry thinking?

This subject deserves more time/thought/words than I have to devote to it. But I find myself in a curious position when it comes to supporting ACORN's tactics if not their ultimate strategic goal. I wish people would consider whether or not the "American Dream," as defined here, is the bathwater, not the baby.


The situation is complex (4.00 / 1)
The scope of this crisis is global, not just American. So coming up with a solution is going to be a hard slog.

ACORN's ultimate strategic goal in this is not necessarily about saving homeownership per se. But as an organization of low and moderate income people, we are concerned about things that help build wealth in poor communities. Homeownership is the path open to most people to get them into the middle class. This is also the case in minority communities.

If we could figure out a way to preserve the wealth of these communities that didn't depend so heavily on homeownership, then we would be willing to figure that out.

Right now we want a serious commitment to deal with the foreclosure crisis because it is destroying our communities and stripping the wealth out of the hands of families who can least afford to absorb its loss. This is triage. Once we get stabilized we can figure out what kind of specific surgery is required. We would hope that it includes some new avenues to replace the wealth creation engine that homeownership has been for low-income communities.


[ Parent ]
Thank you for the comment. (0.00 / 0)
It makes a great deal of sense.

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox