Opening Up Take Flight Microgrants

by: Chris Bowers

Mon Mar 30, 2009 at 21:10


Three weeks ago, Take Flight Microgrants, a part of the non-profit Kos Fellowship Program, made its public launch. TFM seeks to identify emerging, progressive, grassroots organizations, and to support those organizations through funding and networking.  It is an organization that exists entirely to help your ideas for new grassroots organizations become a reality

Tonight, I have some important announcements about the Take Flight Microgrants. During the three weeks since the launch, I have been working to come up with ways of making Take Flight Microgrants more transparent and interactive. Now, I am excited to share them with you, because I believe they improve the program quite a bit:

  1. 101 Sample Submissions: First, I wanted to share with you the 101 ideas that were submitted to the BlogPac Infrastructure Contest two years ago (26 page PDF; the names and contact information of the applicants have been removed, of course). These were the ideas that made me, and the folks at the Kos Fellowship Program, believe in the need for an organization like Take Flight Microgrants. I was absolutely blown away that so many excellent ideas for new media, community organizing, activist tool development, and so much more came in over only a two-week period, based on only three diaries cross-posted on Daily Kos and Open Left. Deciding which ideas to fund was very difficult, and convinced me that I needed to find a way to support the great ideas bubbling up from the progressive grassroots on a regular basis. Check out the ideas for yourself--I think you will be impressed, too.

  2. Donors view, and comment on, all submissions first: Contributing to Take Flight Microgrants will give you a seat on the inside of the selection process. Before any decisions are made by the selection board, which is composed of one member from each partner organization, and before any finalists are revealed to the public, all donors to Take Flight Microgrants will receive a master summary list of all the grant proposals that were submitted. The format will be very similar to the "master summary list" linked in the above bullet point. All donors will then be given an option to comment on which proposals they most enjoy, and these comments will help the selection board determine the 30-40 finalists. If you want a say in which ideas Take Flight Microgrants ends up supporting, then you should donate today.

  3. Public comment period on finalists: After the 30-40 finalists have been chosen, summaries of those ideas will be posted online for a period of public commentary. Transparency of this sort is necessity for an organization like Take Flight Microgrants. Based on my past experience, trust me when I say that it is not easy to make these decisions. We simply need a broad range of input in order to make the decisions that will best fit the progressive grassroots. This is why we have a diverse selection board, input from our small donors, and input from the community at large. Without this interactivity, there is no way to know which ideas are the right ones to support.

  4. Submission deadline extended to Friday, April 10th: We would love to start out with as many submissions a possible (several dozen have already been submitted). As such, I am extending the grant proposal submission deadline to Friday, April 10th. This will allow more time for new proposals to come in, and for the proposals to come in from a wide variety of sources. So, if you haven't already, submit your grant proposal today!

Increasing transparency and interactivity are goals of the Obama administration, and we take them seriously at Take Flight Microgrants, as well. This is an organization designed to make your ideas for new progressive organizations become a reality. So, help them come to life by sending in a grant proposal, and donating to Take Flight Microgrants now.  This is an organization that will not work without your ideas, and the ideas will not get off the ground without your financial support. Together, we can build the next great generation of progressive infrastructure.

Chris Bowers :: Opening Up Take Flight Microgrants

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Great work (0.00 / 0)
this is a really exiting initiative.

It wasn't quite clear how the final projects would be funded however. I got that maximum donation was 5k and that representatives from different groups would have a big role, but would the money donated to Take Flight by doled out entirely by representatives from big blogs or would there be some kind of vote or what? A more detailed explanation of how you see that would be great.

And thanks! I'm really looking forward to seeing some of the ideas.  

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power


So, there's no way to submit a proposal for 3rd party implementation? (0.00 / 0)
I wasn't sure how to express this question succinctly. What I meant was: Let's say that I have an idea (e.g., this one, which Lawrence Lessig said was "very cool") which I think should be a) funded and b) worked on by somebody, but that I don't have the time or inclination to work on it, myself. Maybe I want to participate in an advisory role (for free), or maybe I don't even have the time or inclination for that. Why can't I submit a proposal, have it get funded, and then have individuals or groups submit their own 'proposals', which consist of arguments why they would be well-suited for implementing the idea?

In the case of my ostracism idea, mentioned above, while I can easily believe that a decent software infrastructure implementation can be obtained for less than $5K, properly promoting the implemented idea would require much more money - the more, the better. Do you have plans (even tentative ones) for facilitating  Stage 2 financing? Alliances with other groups with deeper pockets which also focus on progressive or civic-oriented projects?

BTW, I recently contacted the office of a local politician, and asked whether we can, indeed, obtain the information of registered Democrats. He directed my to a county government building. So, right now I believe that my idea is feasible, as long as the price of getting the information in electronic form isn't prohibitive.

====================================

Some other points:

Ideally, a web facility will be provided to allow individuals working on projects to solicit help, especially expert commentary. Also, how about a central blog, where proposal acceptees can give the blow-by-blow of their implementation, if so desired? That will doubtless generate suggestions, offers of help, etc.

Providing the infrastructure to collaborate online would be a nice to have. E.g., Sharepoint, which allows lots of flexibility in throwing together a collaboration-friendly web site, on the fly, without the services of a programmer. (Though experience in Sharepoint is definitely a plus.)

Speaking of which, whatever happened to the project for tracking legislation, to help it get out of committee? I created a Sharepoint prototype, which I describe here (you don't need a password, anymore.)

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


"peer-to-peer grantee brainstorming" (0.00 / 0)
I suppose that this is the mechanism to Stage 2 funding. Can you give details?

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


[ Parent ]
Also desirable: Controlled 3d Party Implementation (0.00 / 0)
The 'tweener case between submitting a proposal for myself to do, and submitting a proposal for a 3rd party to do according to their own lights, is to submit a proposal where the money goes to a 3rd party, but control remains with the person who submitted the proposal. The 3rd party will be honor-bound to disperse funds as directed by the proposal acceptee.

The reason for this is that the person who is submitting the proposal may have tons of solid implementation details in their head which they don't want to take the time to write up (plus a solid vision of how everything is supposed to turn out), but don't want to accept any money, themselves, say for tax reasons.

There are two variations of this idea. One is that the 3rd party not only disperses funds, but also does some or all of the work, at the direction of the proposal acceptee. The other variation is that the 3rd party merely purchase goods and services at the direction of the proposal acceptee, and have no other involvement beyond that. (Well, cheerleader is fine. :-) )

This isn't merely an abstract question. I'd be interested in submitting a proposal, myself, for the ostracism idea, but neither want to spend my own money, nor accept money, for a Day 1 implementation. Most of my involvement would be in design of a web site, and most all of the cash would be for hosting and creation (including graphics) of the site.  

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox