The Pelosi and Rahm "Social Club" Neuters Conyers Investigation

by: Matt Stoller

Tue Sep 11, 2007 at 14:18


This is just disgusting behavior from Nancy Pelosi and Rahm Emanuel.

House Democratic leaders have decided to postpone a vote on a criminal contempt resolution against White House chief of staff Joshua Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers for several weeks, and possibly longer, according to top lawmakers and aides.

The decision delays any constitutional showdown, at least for the moment, between Congress and President Bush over the extent of executive privilege and the president's ability to fend off congressional investigations.

Rarely do fights between the Speaker and Chairman break into public, but this one is.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) said he is uncomfortable with the delay and worries the House will be seen as toothless unless it moves quickly to hold top officials in contempt for failing to provide documents and testimony in congressional probes...

Conyers said it was critical for Congress to enforce its subpoenas against executive branch officials, including senior White House aides.

"Otherwise, we just become a [social] club," Conyers said, adding that he would be reviewing the issue with Pelosi soon.

Conyers is correct to note this, and he should be applauded for his willingness to stand up for Congress's duty to investigate and hold the executive branch accountable for its activities.  Apparently, though Pelosi and Emanuel are so craven they seek to make Congress irrelevant.

Congress deserves its low regard.  I am tired of being betrayed by people like Pelosi, Emanuel, and Hoyer, who treat Congress like a social club.  They are at this point as responsible as partisan operatives like Petraeus for the sad situation of our government.

Matt Stoller :: The Pelosi and Rahm "Social Club" Neuters Conyers Investigation

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Why do these people get a government salary? (4.00 / 3)
I think Chairman Conyers hits the nail on the head.  It seems that what exists among Democratic party officeholders is a clubby consensus attitude of being against the war and against this Administration's power grabs, but it's just a pose without any follow-through that might entail any risk to their jobs. 

They feign outrage about abuse of power and talk big about "subpoena power" when they're asking for our money and votes, but when the time comes to actually do something they back down without a fight because they're really afraid of being called bad names by people who disagree with them.  I guess they think they are incapable of winning a fight. 

Or maybe they're just playing us the way the Wall Street Republicans play the pro-life crowd.

Voter Genome Project


My guess is that they want to wait to deal with this (4.00 / 1)
until after the upcoming budget fight, which Bush seems to want to lead to a government shutdown (hoping that it will do for Republicans what it did for Democrats in 1996.)

That's a bad strategy.  If we're headed into a gigantic brawl, we should want the opponent reeling back on its heels, and this is one issue that could do it.  So the political argument for waiting isn't there, and on the merits Congress has to go forward.  Who the hell is advising her on this?

I speak only for myself, not for those voices in the next room that won't leave me alone.


always they wai to fight. . . (0.00 / 0)
so they never fight.  Except against the base.

[ Parent ]
I'm not excusing it (0.00 / 0)
I'm just trying to explain why this may be a timing issue rather than an attempt to bury it altogether.  This is my #1 issue this cycle, so I'm not complacent about it.  I'm hoping Conyers eventually gets his day.

I think you're being a little hyperbolic, but I guess they've earned it this time.

I speak only for myself, not for those voices in the next room that won't leave me alone.


[ Parent ]
I never thought you were excusing it (4.00 / 1)
I was just adding an observation.

[ Parent ]
It kind of makes sense to attack the base (4.00 / 2)
They have to use all that dry powder on something, and if they used it on the Republicans they might get called nasty names.

Voter Genome Project

[ Parent ]
Who's advising her? (4.00 / 2)
  Probably the same crowd that advises Democrats to treat Petraeus like he's Jesus' second coming, and to blow off working people and labor unions, and to keep the powder dry on radical judges, and to never display any passion or enthusiasm, and to never, ever hold Bush accountable for anything lest they "scare the middle" (which, of course, just loves Bush).

  The Democrats are absolutely horrible at politics. Despite that, they remain reasonably competitive in elections, which speaks to how tarnished the GOP brand has become (and reveals how inherently progressive Americans really are). If the party ever gets a competent group of advisers, the Republicans will cease to exist.

"We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. It is a great convenience." -- Howard Zinn


[ Parent ]
Democrats? (0.00 / 0)
What are those?

All I see is the Left Wing of the Republican Party

"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


Any sense of what reason(s) being given for delay? (0.00 / 0)
My initial reaction, like yours, was that this sucks. But I would want to know what the reasoning was before coming to a final decision as to what I think.

Because they are fucking lame! (0.00 / 0)
Because "they have not briefed lawmakers on what it would mean and how the controversy would play out, both legally and politically."  And that, apparently, is going to take two months. During which the Bush administration will continue to operate as if there is only one branch of government, and our "leaders" in Congress will do their very best to blur the lines between the parties, make themselves significantly responsible for the Iraq war in the eyes of the public, and completely fuck up our chances at another landslide election.

You're better at reserving judgment than I am, Mike.

I support John McCain because children are too healthy anyway.


[ Parent ]
Rahm the poodle? (0.00 / 0)
This move seems odd because Rahm has a reputation as an attack dog who goes for the jugular.

We won the Battle. Now the Real Fight for Change Begins. Join MoveOn.org and fight for progressive change.  

Rahm is ALL talk (4.00 / 2)
  No action. Ever.

  Unless it's against progressives.

  I honestly don't have any idea why the hell Rahm is a Democrat, to be honest.

"We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. It is a great convenience." -- Howard Zinn


[ Parent ]
Rahm does whatever AIPAC and their allied neocons.... (0.00 / 0)
tell him to do. Add in Nancy's corporatist backers, and her embrace of AIPAC dogma, and I don't think we'll see these "leaders" doing too much damn boat rocking.

[ Parent ]
I'm sure they're just following orders. (4.00 / 1)
Mebbe the word has come down just to let the Busheviki limp along into oblivion. And a determination was made that exposing the Busheviki to investigation would reveal too much about the hands up the puppets' asses, both in the BuShiteHouse AND in Congress.
Who knows?
All one can be certain of is that some loathesome, cheap, sell-out, cya deal has been done, and the fix is in.

'They' the 'Democrat' Party 'LeaderSheep'... (0.00 / 0)
...man, lotta quotation marks in that title....put it down to snark or irony. Or are they the same thing?

Anyway our great leaders have decided that they really, really LIKE Bush's strategy of 'running out the clock....'

Which, as many have said here, is awfully dumb since in that case the 'Democrat' Party will take ownership of the occupation in 2008 even if the LeaderSheep strategy works!

Of course a lot could happen between now and then....

Say, Edwards winning the Presidency.

Peace, Health and Prosperity for Everyone.


My 6th grader gets it (4.00 / 1)
My 6th grade daughter understood why congress needs to issue Contempt citations after just a brief explanation based on her civics class from last year.

But Democratic Party Representatives aren't clear about the importance of checks and balances and what their responsibility is?


Failure To Imeach Is Complicity... (4.00 / 2)
...approval ... exoneration for the regime.

That's what this is all about: Impeachophobia

Conyers should take this opportunity to rescue the party from the DC LieberDem "leadership."

Without impeachment, we've got Blue Flu coming big time in 2008.

--


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox