What a Real Grass Roots Spontaneous Protest Movement Looks Like

by: Daniel De Groot

Wed Apr 15, 2009 at 22:04


Like so:


"Join the Impact" began as a blog post and email template by Willow Witte, a friend of Balliett's who had sent the missive to inspire friends after the passage of California's anti-gay marriage Proposition 8.

[...] Balliett responded to her friend's email saying, according to a post on the site, "We shouldn't wait, we need to mobilize now, and we need to on a national level, at the exact same moment, throughout the country."

And mobilize they did: this past Friday, Nov. 7, '"Join the Impact" hit the web. Five hours later, the site logged 10,000 visitors. Apparently a lot of other people shared the young women's desire to turn despair into resolve.

By midnight, 20 cities' worth of young volunteers had signed on to organize protests against the discriminatory propositions.

The next evening, Nov. 8, the site had tripled its hits.

By Monday morning, a plan had emerged: Cities around the country would organize their own efforts to coordinate a synchronized protest for Sat., Nov. 15, 10:30 a.m. PST. The movement became officially global with hits from the UK and France, and by Nov. 11, over one million visitors had come to the site.

And the Result?


Balliett said supporters in 300 cities in the U.S. and other countries were holding marches, and she estimated 1 million people would participate, based on responses at the Web sites her group set up.
Daniel De Groot :: What a Real Grass Roots Spontaneous Protest Movement Looks Like
And:


n Los Angeles, protesters gathered near City Hall before marching through downtown. Police said 10,000 to 12,000 people demonstrated.

And:


Thousands of people rallied outside Boston City Hall yesterday to voice their support for same-sex marriage and protest the recent California vote that made it illegal in that state.

Despite intermittent rain, about 4,000 people from Boston and beyond attended, organizers estimated.[...]

I don't know whether Bailliett's claim of 1 million people worldwide participating in the protest is accurate, but at the current moment Pajamas TV is estimating the total turnout of the tea parties at 208,000.  

A bit more context from the Tea Party people themselves:


The Tea Party protests, in their current form, began in early 2009 when Rick Santelli, the On Air Editor for CNBC, set out on a rant to expose the bankrupt liberal agenda of the White House Administration and Congress. Specifically, the flawed "Stimulus Bill" and pork filled budget.

During Rick's rant (see video below), he called for a "Chicago tea Party" where advocates of the free-market system could join in a protest against out of control government spending.

So from 19 February to 15 April, the tea party people only manage to muster 200K for their great cause.

So unless Bailliett is overestimating by a factor of more than five, she was able, without the help of ACORN, Soros or Michael Moore to organize more people in 8 days than all the Koch's horses and men could do in almost 2 months.

We're also comparing the tea baggers to a protest about an issue that only directly affects at most 10% of the population (the usual upward estimate of the proportion of the population that is homosexual), including at least one fairly big protest (Boston) in a state where gay marriage is already legal.  A whole lot of people showed up in true solidarity even though they had no direct stake in the outcome.

On the other hand taxes and government debt are of direct concern to everyone.  The subjects have been covered extensively in the media, and were front and centre in a well attended and high interest national election just 6 months ago.  This stuff is on just about everyone's mind.  It's not as if people aren't annoyed about the bailouts either.  There actually is some anger to tap.  Yet the right has clearly failed to find but a thin vein of rage in this mine.

Anyway the contrast is pretty stark, no?


Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Thanks, I needed that! (0.00 / 0)
I was starting to get a little nervous today that they were gaining some momentum... Of course the teabaggers will get a lot more press than we ever got, but, if all they can muster is about 250,000 in a gazillion locations with non-stop media hounding and tons of cash funneled their way, then it's not much of a wake up call or a movement...

Astroturf can't beat real activism...

There may be another bright side to all of this... I'm really getting a sense, based on some of the interviews, that a Perot-like reform party could form that would suck away serious GOP votes if the right leader emerged.  Who that would be is unclear... It won't be anyone from the GOP old guard... Some really rich egomaniac might fit the bill for them, but it's so hard to wrest party discipline from their clutches for a phyrric, failed attempt at a presidency...

However, if the "grassroots" part starts to gel somewhat, we might see some "anti-washington" third party congressional candidates that have enough clout to steal GOP votes big time...  This part should be encouraged...

These people may side with the GOP, but they aren't happy with them... They claim 'cos of increased spending or whatever, but that's BS.  They don't like the GOP 'cos the GOP can't win anymore and don't look like they can win anything in the near future, either...  Nothing worse for a conservative than a loser...  So, some sort of third "tea party" is areal possibility, especially if the "movement" gets away from the astroturfers' control...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


Ron Paul is the obvious choice at this stage... (0.00 / 0)
The main issue is whether Paul would drop the GOP for what would be a conservative/libertarian protest campaign.  Even still there is plenty of time for a Perot-type to come out of the woodwork.  

The more interesting part would be if there was real grassroots movement at a local level that sought to grow into a new national party.  While gaining a seat or two in Congress wouldn't necessarily signal the next great Conservative 'Awakening' it would certainly show that there is some real political thinking going on amongst conservatives.


[ Parent ]
So, let me get this straight... (0.00 / 0)
You say:
a friend of Balliett's who had sent the missive to inspire friends
is behind the firing up of this spontaneous grass roots assembly. So because corporations 'fired up' these right groups, their assembly is less passionate or important to them? Because that's the argument I am hearing. I don't think people care from where the fire gets lit if they feel it holds true for them. Just because a corporation started the ball rolling, doesn't mean people don't identify with its message. I feel like there are little kids yelling "our message is better than yours because it came from x"...honestly shouldn't we be more worried about the 'message' then who started the firing up and therefore discredit the source? I mean if someone tried to tell me that I should shut up because the source got me thinking, I'd be more incensed that someone feels they have the right to shut me up for what I believe! This is so hypocritical!!

Concern troll (4.00 / 1)
is concerned.

[ Parent ]
well (4.00 / 3)
I also think their message is garbage, but that wasn't the point I was trying to make here.

How many people would have come out for Balliett's protest if CNN had hyped it for weeks, and piles of Democratic strategists and funders had helped organize it?

My only point is, there really aren't very many people who feel this way since shaking the tree very hard only dropped out a pretty small number of fruits.  If there really was mass outrage over Democratic tax policy, there should have been a lot more people.


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox