Hard to Sympathize With the Newspaper Industry When You See This...

by: David Sirota

Fri Apr 17, 2009 at 13:54


I'm a huge fan of newspapers, and really want the newspaper industry to survive. However, it's extremely difficult to feel bad for the industry when you read something like this:*

Former U. S. Sen. Rick Santorum is collecting $1,750 a shot for the columns that appear every other week in the Inquirer, according to documents filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court. The checks are sent to a post office box in Great Falls, Va.

The Philadelphia Inquirer, which is published in the overwhelmingly Democratic city of Philadelphia (the city that quite literally voted Santorum out of office), is paying lunatic fringe conservative has-been Rick Santorum $1,750 per column**...and the paper now is shocked to find itself facing bankruptcy.

I'm not saying that there is a one-to-one correlation - that is, I'm not saying that the paper is bankrupt because of this one column contract. But I am guessing that kind of absurd spending decision is emblematic of other absurd spending decisions.

I've always believed it has been a bad business decision for papers representing overwhelmingly Democratic towns to nonetheless disproportionately stack their editorial pages with conservatives. It's not that I think there shouldn't be any conservative voices on the page, I just think there shouldn't only or mostly be conservative voices. Doing that in overwhelmingly Democratic towns seems to me to be about the easiest way for a newspaper to repel readers.

In that light, I've always wondered why the Inquirer devoted any newsprint to Santorum. I mean, only a few years ago, there was literally a poll of the entire city called a Senate election, and in that poll, Philadelphia made overwhelmingly clear it hates Rick Santorum. And yet, now it comes out that the city's paper is not only spending newsprint on him, but $1,750 per column...that's just a mind-bogglingly bad decision both in terms of repelling readers and in terms of wasting money. It's as if the Inquirer's desire is to lose readership and burn cash.

* By the way, I'm guessing a lot of hardworking Philadelphia Inquirer journalists feel the same disgust - if not more - about  Santorum's wingnut welfare as anyone else.

** As a comparison, I don't make $1,750 in two months worth of columns - and that's total (ie. at the end of two months, for all the columns I write and that are published in more than 50 publications, my total paycheck is less than $1,750). Now, fine, I'm not a former fringe conservative U.S. Senator living off of wingnut welfare. But still, $1,750 per column is absolutely silly. That's money that could be going into local reporting.

David Sirota :: Hard to Sympathize With the Newspaper Industry When You See This...

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Not only Santorum (4.00 / 4)
Brian Tierney, that right wing hack who owns the paper, has treated us to guest columns by Newt Gingrich, and by bi weekly columns by.... John F-CKING Yoo.

It goes on and on, too, and certainly makes me wonder what the hell he thinks he is accomplishing.  (And of course, Tierney once pledged never to interfere with the editorial decisions, and then forced the Inq. to write endorsements for McCain and Obama.  Ridiculous.


It's Worse Than That (4.00 / 5)
Throughout most of the 20th Century, the news was overwhelmingly bad for conservatives.  Their economic theories lead to the Great Depression.  Their racial superiority theories gave us the NAZIs, WWII and genocide. Their domestic politics gave us criminals like Spiro T. Agnew and Tricky Dick Nixon.  Conservative columnists provided "balance" to the well-known left-wing bias of the news.

If it weren't for the intense focus on conservative writers in the editorial pages, conservatism itself might have withered away and died.  And given the class interests of the newspaper owners, there was no way in hell they were going to let that happen.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


This wouldn't have to happen in a two paper town (4.00 / 1)
Given that Santorum is a wingnut welfare recipient, whose job it is to spread whatever propaganda has been set as the flavour of the fortnight, hasn't the column already been paid for?  Why should any newspaper participate in what is at base double-billing? And why dignify his writing as 'opinion'?  Call it what it is -- advertising -- and charge accordingly.


actually one column from Santorum is a good reason (0.00 / 0)
I moved to Philadelphia three years ago and always thought it was a bad paper even before Rupert-Murdoch-Wannabe, Brian Tierney took it over.  If I'm going to pick up one of the locals, I'll choose the tabloid-style Daily News, because it at least knows what it is and doesn't make any pretensions that it is anything but an outlet for local scuttlebutt.  At least it doesn't mince words when the city does something boneheaded.  

I can say without a doubt that if I had been reading it and saw them giving a platform to Santorum, I would have stopped buying it the very next day.  I subscribed to Newsweek for many years, but will not renew after they gave a platform to Karl Rove over the last 6 or 8 months.  I also thought they were completely irresponsible to recently put out a cover issue declaring "we are all Socialists now."  Nothing that is going on in this country is socialist; that is clear if you just read explanations on the various political ideologies on Wikipedia.  The only motivation for doing a cover piece like that would be to stir up the crazies.

I agree with Arianna Huffington, passionately, that the media instigates the Red State/Blue State divisions, by insisting on turning everything into an issue with a conservative or liberal "side".  Not everything is ideological, in fact, most things within the realm of journalism should be simply fact-based.  For instance, climate change does not deserve right and left opinions.  It is scientific fact and the things we should do if we're serious about combating it are factual as well.

Getting back to the original subject, Rick Santorum, since he was once my Congressman, I know that very little of what he says has any basis in fact, and therefore does not belong in any outlet that categorizes itself as news.

The Inquirer is done, and it deserves its fate.  The real writing talent in Philadelphia is working for the alternative weeklies and is blogging.


The Newspaper INDUSTRY? (0.00 / 0)
I worked for newspapers for more than 10 years, and I have to wonder if you are tarring and feathering every newspaper with the same brush.

This sounds like a bad business decision by the Inquirer, but what does it have to do with problems that other newspapers are experiencing? Suggesting that you find it difficult to sympathize with the industry because one newspaper made a bad business decision is like saying you won't do business with any bank because Citi has been squandering its money on a new corporate jet and the naming rights to the Mets' new ballpark.


I cancelled my subscription (0.00 / 0)
And a lot of my friends and family did too.  Or at least cut down how often they get it.  What's the point?  If you want local news, there are better options (News of Delaware County, for example); if you want national news, there's the net, or the NYTimes if you insist on getting a paper delivered.

The one that disgusted my uncle enough was the recent Santorum column which contained the claim that Obama had a (paraphrase) "deep-seated hatred of America".


What Are David Brooks and Ross Whathisname (0.00 / 0)
getting at the NYT?  At a time of financial emergency, they are paying a lot of money for analysis of a conservative movement that has no substance.

Would it clarify matters for you... (0.00 / 0)
If I told you first Tierney made all his money as a GOP PR flack with his own media firm? While he didn't actively interfere in the Inky stories (as far as I know), he did go for the "fair and balanced" approach we all know and love. Hence, the gig for Little Ricky!

Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search