D.C. Reporters Just Make Shit Up, Part 1,489,890,992,384

by: David Sirota

Fri Apr 17, 2009 at 16:45


I was reading this [link fixed], the zillionth "analysis" of political populism from a Washington, D.C.-based reporter, when I came upon this pretty perfect example of how Beltway journalists just make shit up:

The country today is different. America has an enormous middle class that is heavily invested in the financial system and is hardly about to organize for its overthrow...

People who have lost half the value of their 401(k) plans, in other words, want to regain it by having the economy rebound, not by seizing the assets of ExxonMobil Corp.

If this reporter was even the slightest bit interested in whether this banalia was true, he would have spent all of 5 seconds on the Google and found that actually, empirical public opinion data shows that Americans are quite supportive of "seizing the assets" of oil companies like ExxonMobil.

As USA Today reported a few months ago, a windfall profits tax  - ie. a tax to seize oil company assets - is wildly popular, according to its surveys. This was the same finding as ABC News' earlier poll. Indeed, even the conservative-leaning Rasmussen found that just 47 percent of Americans oppose complete and total nationalization of the entire oil industry.

But, you see, when creating D.C. myths - in this case, the myth that Americans celebrate being ruled by corporate special interests, want no change, are completely happy with the status quo, and love oil companies - Washington reporters aren't interested in actual data. They live in a world of six-figures and lobbyists and cocktail parties - a cloistered gated community whose residents are nauseated by the idea of "seizing assets" of the wealthiest corporations in the world. And so these reporters assume the consensus of that gated community is the consensus of the majority of Americans who live outside that gated community - even when the hard data says exactly the opposite.

I wonder if instead of working in the factual world, I should just start making shit up. It would save me so much time in my work to not have to, ya know, verify anything. I could write entire columns just saying the first piece of conventional wisdom that came into my mind, without even bothering to see if it was true. Wow...what an easy life that would be.

David Sirota :: D.C. Reporters Just Make Shit Up, Part 1,489,890,992,384

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Welcome to George Will's World! (4.00 / 1)
It's who the DeeCee middle-level reporters all want to be, if they can't be David Broder or Cokie Roberts.  And the fact-free world is their favorite.

Just A Sec--Windfall Profits Tax =/= "Siezing Assets" (4.00 / 5)
Not that it matters to the underlying point.  After all, fundamentally changing the tax structure would be a very populist thing to do, and a windfall profits tax would be squarely in the middle of that.  So, the writer has set up a false dichotomy to begin with.

But still, we have to be careful about not getting sloppy ourselves.  We have to meet a higher standard than them.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


Well if it's not seizing assets... (4.00 / 1)
...then what is it?  The idea is to seize their ill-gotten gains and redistribute them fairly.  Why not call a spade a spade?

[ Parent ]
uh (0.00 / 0)
Why are they "ill-gotten"?  Just because they're large?

[ Parent ]
If You Don't Know The Difference Between Assets And Income (4.00 / 2)
You don't know how to use Google.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
If You Don't Know The Difference Between Assets And Income (0.00 / 0)
You don't know how to use Google.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
A good example of how DC reporters have no integrity (4.00 / 1)
Fact checking is the difference between real journalists and corporate mouthpieces.

Versailles (4.00 / 4)
They live in a world of six-figures and lobbyists and cocktail parties - a cloistered gated community whose residents are nauseated by the idea of "seizing assets" of the wealthiest corporations in the world.

They live in a world where anyone who criticizes the King (Rupert Murdoch) or his interests gets exiled.

The question is, why do NewsCorp shareholders and bond holders think that a man who routinely lies to his readers will be more honest in his SEC filings?


Just DC reporters? (4.00 / 2)
They ALL make it up.  Sprinkle in a few facts to make it seem like its for real.  Spin it according to their world view.  We had a local radio guy here Detroit "make up" the end of sporting event the he didn't stick around for.  Got busted for it.  No apology...nothing.  They just don't give a shit about reporting the truth.  

Reality = us (0.00 / 0)
If bloggers and left wing folks tried this kind of bullshit, readers and commenters would set them straight, whereas the the reality challenged right-wing lie to each other and snicker and wink and move on to the next republican talking point. If they keep talking to each other they make the lie the truth.

George Orwell spoke to this tactic 60 years ago, he used fiction to try to educate people to the this was possible. i have chuckled at how successful the mainstream media has been used by the entrenched powers for decades.

It is with the coming of age new media with the interactive component that will bring a new way of the public being educated about political issues.

Look at the comments that a politician receives when posting to a site like Daily Kos and you will see democracy work in a way that will bring the change that we all worked so hard to make a reality.


Are you on crack? (0.00 / 0)
How can you watch CNN, MSNBC or all most of the newspapers in the US and not see the blatant misinformation and out right lies?

And you want to talk about American's supporting seizing private company assets have been force fed the idea that anyone who succeeds MUST have done something wrong, immoral or illegal. Should the US government seize the salary of A-Rod or Kobie? What about Sean Combs? Maybe Sean Penn? They are able to make a ton of money and it is not fair to me. I want the government to take their money and redistribute it.

 

Right Wing Extreme.

Cause someone has to be right!


[ Parent ]
Wall Street Journal (0.00 / 0)
Is it a D.C. myth or a New York myth?

The truth about Saxby Chambliss

Gotta disagree with you here David. (0.00 / 0)
and it's an important point.  

As bogus as the "Tea Party" events were, they showed the right is more able at this point in time to put people in the streets than we are(at least if relentlessly hyped by the media - but then, too, Fox News is part of the right.  Not saying their coverage is right or fair, but ultimately, they count as part of what we have to beat).

But since polls have only a very slight relationship to what comes out the other end of the political sausage grinder, I would have to say that there is some kernel of truth in the WSJ analysis.  Yes, people would be okay with taxing windfall profits of the oil industry but no, they're not about to take to the streets over this issue, which is what it would take to actually make it happen.

sTiVo's rule: Just because YOU "wouldn't put it past 'em" doesn't prove that THEY did it.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox