"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Is FAIL, Needs to Go

by: Andrew Davey

Sun May 10, 2009 at 15:01


(Proudly cross-posted at C4O Democrats and OC Progressive)

OK, so today's Mothers' Day. I'm planning to stop by my mom's house shortly and check up on her. But before I do that, I must address this:

President Barack Obama's national security adviser says allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military is in the early discussions.

But retired Marine Gen. James Jones says it's very preliminary in a very busy administration.

Jones said Sunday he's not sure if the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy would be overturned, although Obama has said he wants it eliminated. Jones said the decision to go forward lies with the president.

For now, Jones says, "We have a lot on our plate right now."

Mr. Jones, President Obama, and members of Congress, you just allowed this fine patriotic soldier to be fired. And believe it or not, we've already lost too many thousands of good soldiers simply because they're queer. Now's the time to lift the military service ban. Seriously.

Andrew Davey :: "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Is FAIL, Needs to Go
There was no good reason for Dan Choi to be fired, none at all. He was a good soldier. He still loves this country. He served this country honorably. Yet because he showed real courage in coming out, we have to lose him. Why?

Really, why? Because the old timers in the "national security establishment" like Jim Jones are too afraid to allow LGBT people to serve openly in the military? Because Washington politicians are too afraid of doing something that most Americans now support?

Why are we willing to risk our own national security to fire good soldiers that happen to be LGBT? Is the good intelligence provided by an Arabic speaking linguists not really "good" if he's gay? Are the soldiers being protected by a fellow soldier out on the battle field not really "safe" if that solider happens to be a lesbian? Are the lives being saved by an army medic not actually "saved" if that medic is transgender? Give me a break!

President Obama, Speaker Pelosi, Majority Leader Reid, what are you waiting for? Why should any more soldiers be fired? Why should we continue this ridiculous kabuki dance of forcing LGBT servicemembers into the closet any longer? Haven't we had enough of this BS?

Please, please speak out and demand the repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"! Legislation has been introduced in Congress, but now's the time for Congress to stop talking about it and start passing it. And yes, now's the time for President Obama to stop talking about repealing the ban and start acting to actually repeal it.

We can't allow this injustice any longer. We simply can't afford it.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Tips, please? (4.00 / 2)
Not for me, but for them. Thanks.

Yes, Virginia, there are progressives in Nevada.

Gays were good enough for the famed Samurii and even encouraged (0.00 / 0)
So what.  The problem is with paying attention to idiots.

You're looking at the policy all wrong. (0.00 / 0)
I'm sorry, but this kind of ignorance is just too painful to watch.  

"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Is SUCCEED.  

Please keep in mind that I'm not trying to justify, only to explain:

The military has more than enough real and potential problems related to sex when everyone is straight, but they can theoretically "solve" most of those problems by keeping potential sexual partners as separate as possible.  So they segregate by gender and ban homosexuals.  That's not a value judgement, just a matter of applying a rule universally.  It's also not a policy, it's law.

DADT was a huge positive change.  Clinton couldn't change the UCMJ, but he could direct the military to stop actively searching for violations- to apply it only when they had to.  Like when someone goes on Rachel Maddow to tell the world.

Why would you want to overturn the policy that specifically allows gays to serve?  

Some day, UCMJ will probably be changed to allow homosexuals to serve openly.  I don't think it will be soon, no matter how many states get gay marriage this year.  In the military, individual (or group) rights get trumped by "conduct to the prejudice of good order and discipline."  In this case, homosexuals' right to serve is being denied as part of an effort to predictably remove sexual relationships as a factor in many critical relationships within the military.

The whole point of UCMJ is that the military have fewer rights and more restrictions placed upon them than regular people.  Under those circumstances, DADT is huge.  It lets gays get treated just like everyone else- by oppressing them.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox