Move Over Pennsylvania, Connecticut Now Most Interesting 2010 Senate Campaign

by: Chris Bowers

Wed May 27, 2009 at 09:53


A new Connecticut poll this morning from Quinnipiac shows incumbent Democratic Senator Chris Dodd improving his position for re-election quite a bit. Dodd's prospects are still very much uphill, but they are an improvement none the less:

Quinnipiac, May 20-25, 1,575 RVs, MoE 2.5 (March numbers in parenthesis)
Simmons: 45% (50%)
Dodd: 39% (34%)

Dodd: 41% (37%)
Caligiuri: 39% (41%)

While these numbers are still very much uphill for Dodd (it is never good for an incumbent to be around 40%), there are come factors working in his favor:

  1. Rob Simmons has $20 in the bank. That isn't $20K or $20M, but $20.00. Simmons failed to raise money during what should have been a great time to build a warchest.

  2. The economy will be better in 2010 than in 2009. By this time next year, the economy will likely be growing again, jobs will probably be returning, and health care reform will have been passed.
Two of the most important advantages held by challengers are absent in Connecticut. Simmons is not raising the money to define himself (53% of voters don't know who he is), and by next year Democrats should be taking credit for an economic recovery largely based upon the stimulus package and other recent policies. As Senate banking chair, Dodd will be able to take credit for many of those policies, himself.

Overall, reports of Senator Dodd's demise appear to be premature. In fact, rather than the general election, he might actually face more trouble in the primary from businessman Merrick Alpert, who right now only trails Dodd 44%--24% among registered Democrats. Alpert can self-finance, and is a veteran opposed to the American military presence in Afghanistan. With nearly two-thirds of Democrats now sharing that position, Alpert might have a real shot. A 20% advantage in a primary one year out is not much of an advantage at all.

Now, the Connecticut blogosphere isn't very impressed with Merrick Alpert. My Left Nutmeg has been particularly harsh for Alpert's apparent willingness to use right-wing media and talking points. Also, despite the favorable poll numbers for Alpert, CT Blue makes a good point about the difficulty of ballot access for Democratic primaries in Connecticut. In a nice bit of original reporting, Connecticut Bob has an interview with Merrick.

The situation in Connecticut is clearly fluid. Just as Dodd'd general election prospects improve, the real possibility of losing in the primary emerges. This far out, it is difficult to make an assessment with any accuracy, but no matter what the future holds for Connecticut, it now appears to be the most interesting Senate race in the nation (again).

Chris Bowers :: Move Over Pennsylvania, Connecticut Now Most Interesting 2010 Senate Campaign

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
LOL, whut? (0.00 / 0)
...health care reform will have been passed.

What are you smoking and can I have the number of your dealer?

Conduct your own interview of Sarah Palin!


care to make a wager on this? (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
It's not happening (0.00 / 0)
I'll take that bet, how about 50 bucks to the 2010 progressive candidate of the winner's choice? Any progressive primary or general challenger.

There may be something passed, but it'll just be some boondoggle giveaway to insurance firms and the like. If there's a even public option at all, it'll be intentionally crippled - simultaneously expensive and worthless. Insurance companies can't compete on a level field, so they won't make the field level.

I'll put my money on "nothing" or "something useless" against your wager of "something useful".

Conduct your own interview of Sarah Palin!


[ Parent ]
Hi Chris... (0.00 / 0)
I presume Simmons Q1 totals came in purposefully low, in order to help launch him to a Million $$$ plus Q2.

Alpert is already an also-ran. His decision to attack, attack, attack Dodd out of the gate was a huge blunder, rendering him pretty much non-viable.

In the latest poll, 33% of Democrats thought Dodd should retire, (in favor of AG Dick Blumenthal, who has a 78% approval rating?) Watch that 33% number go up or down depending on what Dodd does over the next six months.  

If the Clinton gang gets hold of our Dem nomination, there will be consequences, both down-ticket, and regarding your average working person's long term faith in the Party and the process.


Alpert sems viable to me (0.00 / 0)
He only trails Dodd by 20%, despite having a 7% name ID. That is actual data. Claiming that he has rendered himself non-viable just because he attacked the candidate he is running against strikes me as pretty baseless.

[ Parent ]
Viabile? (4.00 / 2)
At the end of a horrid half-year of press, Dodd still posts a 58% - 32% approval/disapproval split among Democrats. Furthermore, there is no significant sign of activists or the progressive base - i.e. DTC members, potential delegates to the state convention, and the most likely primary voters in a closed primary - deserting Dodd.

Aside from the fundraising question, Alpert - a complete unknown who used to work for Enron - will have to do a lot more to prove he is "viable". I don't think attacking Dodd's character using right-wing talking points while conscientiously eschewing any and all discussion of issues will accomplish that.


[ Parent ]
He might well fail (0.00 / 0)
Alpert might well not go anywhere, and it might be for hte reasons you suggest. However, he is close enough in this poll to suggest he might also be a serious challenge.

My my point here is that the poll simply can't be shrugged off as meaningless. No matter what deductive reasons can be offered, he is close enough to Dodd (and rich enough) in this poll that he needs to be taken seriously.

Don't dismiss polls.


[ Parent ]
Not dismissing the poll (0.00 / 0)
Or arguing that it shouldn't be taken seriously. But in truth, the 7% name ID Alpert registers in this is probably about 6.95 percentage points too high. Declaring any challenger "viable" in that context is a huge stretch.

There is absolutely no evidence in this poll - or on the ground - to back up your assertion that Dodd "might actually face more trouble" in a primary than in the general.


[ Parent ]
Well of course he would if a biggie stepped in... (0.00 / 0)
If SOTS Susie Bysiewicz said wtf, let's roll the dice, the polls would have her up instantly by something like 55-35%, among the electorate. (and wouldn't that be a fun convention.)

Yes there is plenty of regard for Senator Dodd, and insiders feel the need to be loyal after 30 years.

But if poll comes out in December showing head-to-head numbers with Simmons beating Dodd, but down 10-20% to Blumenthal or Bysiewicz, I think we'd see a rapid out-migration.

No one wants to lose that Senate seat, and no one wants Connecticut to be Ground Zero for the re-birth of the GOP.


If the Clinton gang gets hold of our Dem nomination, there will be consequences, both down-ticket, and regarding your average working person's long term faith in the Party and the process.


[ Parent ]
Chris, my yellow dog would poll as well as Alpert... (0.00 / 0)
That'd just be the same 1/4 of the Democratic electorate expressing their disapproval of Dodd. But certainly those 24% are not in favor of Alpert, who's never held elective office and is little more than a blip on the radar.

Here is the catch and why Alpert is unelectable out of the gate. 1) If Alpert gets anywhere close to the Senator, Dodd will simply retire in favor of Dick Blumenthal. 2) If Dodd weren't to retire, another Democrat with more strength would jump in, shoving Alpert to the trash heap.
3). Alpert just earned himself a ton of ill-will. Going on FoxNews on Day One? Launching a campaign against a 30yr lion of an incumbent with nothing but attacks? That won't get him the 15% of convention delegates he'd need to get on the ballot without collecting signatures. And if he has to resort to gathering signatures, he'll never get over the hump, not here in CT.

Ergo Alpert has no chance.

CTBlue has a better write-up of what I'm talking about:
http://ctblueblog.com/?p=2593

and here:
http://ctblueblog.com/?p=2574

If the Clinton gang gets hold of our Dem nomination, there will be consequences, both down-ticket, and regarding your average working person's long term faith in the Party and the process.


[ Parent ]
How do u know... (0.00 / 0)
all these things regarding the future:

#2 The economy will be better in 2010 than in 2009. By this time next year, the economy will likely be growing again, jobs will probably be returning, and health care reform will have been passed.

Chris, I normally enjoy reading your posts, but recently your observations and comments are not based on any facts, and are at least as of late absolutely ridiculous...


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox