Public Reaction to Sotomayor More Like Roberts Than Alito or Miers

by: Chris Bowers

Thu May 28, 2009 at 11:49


Polling from Gallup shows that the public reaction to Sonia Sotomayor is more akin to the positive reaction it had to Chief Justice John Roberts, than to the middling reaction it had to Harriet Miers and Justice Samuel Alito:


Despite the conservative rants about Sotomayor being dumb and racist, only 13% of the country thinks she is a poor pick. Assuming for a moment that Americans would consider someone who is dumb and / or a racist a poor pick for Supreme Court, only 13% of Americans share that view.

These polls matter, too. Roberts, who received a favorable reaction from the public, ended up with only 22 votes against his confirmation. By contrast, Alito received 42 no votes (though only 25 on the cloture vote) following his mixed public reception. The polls were the key factor here, given that Samuel Alito and John Roberts faced the exact same Senate, and have voted closer to each other than any other two Justices on the Supreme Court. (Alito and Roberts were the closest pairing in 2006 and 2007, and tied for the closest pairing in 2008, although in conjunction with Scalia they make a set of triplets).

Then again, Democrats were the opposition back then, and the Democratic caucus as a whole will never take an oppositional stance on anything unless dozens of polls show 60% of the country on their side (and even then, their opposition is usually only temporary and skin-deep). Republicans, on the other hand, clearly don't give a rat's ass what polls say. So the question now is not whether or not Sotomayor will be confirmed, but whether or not Senate Republicans fall in line with Gingrich and Limbaugh and make a show of opposing her. Will they choose to dig themselves an even bigger electoral hole with Latinos, only 15% of whom don't want to see Sotomayor confirmed, and reinforce their image as opposing President Obama and congressional Democrats for the sake of opposition? Or, will they, for once, largely take a pass and pick their battles more carefully?

The word is that Senate Republicans do not intend to fight Sotomayor, realizing it gains them nothing but even more animosity from Latinos. However, congressional Republicans have shown a penchant for backtracking on orders from Leader Limbaugh this year, and Limbaugh is ordering them to go to the wall in opposition to Sotomayor. So, the jury might still be out on this one.

Personally, I hope they keep attacking, because it is working out very well for Democrats.

Chris Bowers :: Public Reaction to Sotomayor More Like Roberts Than Alito or Miers

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Figure at least 20 no votes (4.00 / 1)
The GOP needs to maintain credibility with its evangelical base, while at the same time avoiding the appearance of conspicuous racism.

That being said, given the MSM's GOP talking heads du jour, the Dems should benefit somewhat regardless of what GOP senators actually do.  Gingrich, Rove, Buchanan, Limbaugh, etc., have already and will continue to spew vitriol.  People like Tancredo also figure to be highlighted as Sotomayor's nomination dovetails with an established "narrative" (what doesn't that word mean?).

All in all, the circumstances here should favor the Dems considerably.   Although, as is usually the case, precious little in the way of real insight will be offered, and the American people, as always, will suffer for it.    


Why dammit, is the Left not questioning her nomination?? (0.00 / 0)
Read E.J. Dionne's piece in the Post.  Listen to and read Tom Goldstein of Scotus on what a horrendous problem this centrist will create on the Court..

Souter was as far from being a '[centrist' as Joe Lieberman was to diplomacy with Iran.
Sotomayor is just as pro-business and pro-government as the Roberts Court is and her religious heritage, which mysteriously isn't talked about at all, will also sit well with the Roberts Court.

This is a terrible and gutless choice by Obama.  And as a woman and law student who's read many of her opinions - Roe is much more likely to be overturned with her on the Court than ANY other nominee he could have chosen.

Count the Catholics on the Court!
Do you have any idea how Catholic Latinos actually are??  Think of the 4 states whose large Latino populations suddenly over-turned gay marriage.

If anyone thinks she will buck the Pope and be "the first Latina" and Catholic to publicly uphold Roe -you're crazy.

Obama sucked up to the Right and gave them more than they ever asked for, at the expense of those who voted him into office -again.

Nationalism is not the same thing as terrorism, and an adversary is not the same thing as an enemy.


William Brennan was Catholic (4.00 / 1)


[ Parent ]
oops, wouldn't want facts to get in the way of (0.00 / 0)
an anti-obama rant.  

[ Parent ]
Yes, a wonderful proponent of civil liberties.. (0.00 / 0)
And so what does he have to do with the current day concerns over Roe??

I need to clarify that Sotomayor on her own would not seek to overturn Roe. And her emphasis on precedent is not at issue either.
But with a 6-3 Catholic majority now on the court challenges to Roe are on their way.

And it is under the influence of the other 4 at least, who are hell bound to overturn Roe, that she will find herself that wobbly centrist position and will likely cave.

The outcomes of constitutional challenges under Roberts have not been favorable to the majority of the country as it is.  Sotomayor's nomination does not ensure a tip toward the Left, which is what all of us hoped for.

Nationalism is not the same thing as terrorism, and an adversary is not the same thing as an enemy.


[ Parent ]
would you like to make a wager on this? (0.00 / 0)
If anyone thinks she will buck the Pope and be "the first Latina" and Catholic to publicly uphold Roe -you're crazy.


[ Parent ]
You have yet to counter with reason -so no. (0.00 / 0)
As a once avid Obama supporter, I am embarassed by his choices of nothing but centrists.
The Left has repeatedly been ignored while he actively courts even the extremists on the right.
We can't really wager anyway becase I want to be dead wrong in my views.

So better yet, give me -give all of us substantive reasons why my fears are unfounded.

Nationalism is not the same thing as terrorism, and an adversary is not the same thing as an enemy.


[ Parent ]
well, for starters, the talk at berkeley that she has been getting panned for (4.00 / 1)
made it quite clear that she considers herself a feminist, and sees her responsibility, in part, as representing a feminist viewpoint on the court.  

there are no reasons to believe she won't be a staunch supporter of roe -- the cases she decided that ostensibly pertained to abortion had nothing to do with the 4th amendment, privacy, griswold, etc.  in other words, they had nothing to do with abortion rights per se.  

gibbs recently suggested that obama learned, in talking with sotomayor, that she believed roe to be settled precedent.

so, that is some evidence...

on the other side of the ledger: your 'she's catholic' argument...  excuse me if i don't take this kind of borderline offensive argument seriously.

and, i still am offering a bet.  just because you want to be wrong shouldn't prevent you from betting that you are right.  and just because i haven't convinced you shouldn't prevent you from betting... on the contrary.  i'd like you to express a willingness to put your money where your mouth is on this, because i can't help but see your original post as disingenuous.  


[ Parent ]
If Sotomayor weren't Catholic (4.00 / 4)
But had the same record, would you be saying any of this?

It feels like religious profiling.  I'm glad I'm not a Muslim and you're not doing airport security.

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both


[ Parent ]
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search