Obama Receives Large Sotomayor Bump

by: Chris Bowers

Fri May 29, 2009 at 11:41


Rasmussen had been showing President Obama with lower approval ratings than other outlets. They are still doing so, but the trendlines and demographic crosstabs since Sotomayor's nomination are important (emphasis mine):

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 37% of the nation's voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Obama is performing his role as President. Twenty-seven percent (27%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of +10. That's the first time the President Index rating has reached double digits since March 31 (see trends).

On Tuesday morning, just before announcing Sotomayor's selection, the President's Approval Index rating had fallen to the lowest level yet recorded, +1. Since then, the President's numbers have improved significantly among Hispanic voters and liberal voters. Hispanic voters strongly favor the confirmation of Sotomayor who is in line to become the first Hispanic Justice.

The Daily Kos / Research 2000 poll, some of which was conducted before hte Sotomayor nomination, showed President Obama improving to +36% approval from +31% among Latinos. Next week's results should be more enlightening, as will polls from other news outlets next week.

As I wrote in the post below this, Sotomayor's nomination, combined with the Republican attacks on her nomination, could potentially result in a long-term shift of Latinos toward Democrats. While early polling is never a great indicator of long-term trends, it is not only the early polling numbers that suggest this. The perception within the Lainto community of unfair, racially based attacks on Sotomayor by non-Hispanic Republicans can become a political identity shaping moment in the Latino community:

Identity politics usually gets portrayed as something transactional. Some group wants something, and you give it to them in exchange for their support. It could be appointing one of them to an office, or supporting their position on some issue.

I wonder if something bigger than that is possible in the case of the Hispanic community. As far as I can tell, the Hispanic political identity is still somewhat malleable, and there's much to be gained in shaping it. One way to do this is to raise the profile of Hispanic left-wing figures, and get them into fights with unappealing non-Hispanic Republicans. It's true of everybody -- if you don't have strong feelings on some issue, but someone you regard as one of your people presents articulate and forceful arguments on that issue, you're going to gravitate towards the position she was arguing for. It works especially well if she's arguing against some obnoxious outsider.

While President Obama is receiving his first real post-inauguration bump from Sotomayor, and while a disproportionate percentage of that bump is coming from Latinos, Republicans keep calling her stupid, unqualified, mean, racist and privileged. Not only is this a total political disaster for Republicans, but any Republican who actually tries to stop the trainwreck is excoriated by his own party.

The enormity of this political opportunity can hardly be overstated. Republicans are handing us a second Terri Schaivo on a silver platter. We need to keep fueling this discussion.

Chris Bowers :: Obama Receives Large Sotomayor Bump

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
as medical problems go... (4.00 / 5)
a Sotomayor bump is definitely better than a Scalia rash.

On a serious note, I do think the Hispanic vote is more up for grabs than the African American. Religion may be a reason for some who vote Republican. But Sotomayor may demonstrate that you can be Hispanic, Catholic, hard-working, successful and Democratic as well.


Definitely more up for grabs (4.00 / 1)
Especially Cuban-Americans and, to a lesser degree, Mexican-Americans, who make up almost 2 thirds of Latino Americans. You know, there have been some survey suggesting that Latinos actually take a harder stance against illegal immigration than the population at large. But this nomination is something, I suspect, that will unite Latinos (notwithstanding Rush's prediction that Mexicans will be seething with resentment.)

[ Parent ]
Here in New Mexico (0.00 / 0)
the Catholic Church is a big, big factor (~40 percent of our voting population is Hispanic). So some vote solely on the abortion issue.

That said, Obama had a 76 percent approval rating among Hispanics here in the last SurveyUSA poll.

-New Mexico politics from the local perspective.


[ Parent ]
Yes, indeed (4.00 / 5)
I don't like the pick--I would've preferred a strong liberal, especially a economic populist--but as a political move, wow. The Republicans have fallen into Obama's trap. A party even remotely aware of how it appeared to the country would've have issued paeans to her life story and intelligence, before then launching more subtle attacks. But then you just can't hide the GOP black heart, least of all on immigration. For years everyone has known the GOP can't further alienate Latinos, but they can't help themselves. Bush and his people understood this, temporarily saving it after the fallout from Prop 187.

Oh, man, I wish the Democratic Party were better, cause it's going to be dominant for years to come.


There .. fixed it for you (4.00 / 1)
Oh, man, I wish the Democratic Party were better, cause it could be dominant for years to come.

[ Parent ]
Sirota in his radio show was critical too... (4.00 / 3)
...stating that the time to turn the court more progressive was now.  But the flip-side is if Obama can persuade Latinos to be reliably and decidedly Democratic voting, the Court will have an enduring progressive trend.

The DNC should run commercials of Tom Tancredo's CNN appearance yesterday, identifying him as a Republican presidential nominee.

John McCain won't insure children


[ Parent ]
There is another dimension to the (4.00 / 4)
upcoming fight that may be easy to overlook.  In a way you can view the Sotomayor nomination as an expression of American Exceptionalism.  Her life story, from the modest New York beginnings to Yale Law to the Court of Appeals is the story of America at its best.  Opposition to Sotomayor will have to fight against a core American belief, indeed you can argue the defining American belief about itself.

People are going to WANT to believe in her story, and they are going to be rooting for her.


Horatio Alger stories: Obama and Sotomayor (0.00 / 0)
   Spoiled, lazy, underachieving Prodigal Sons:

George W. Bush
John McCain (pre-war)

  Up-by-the-bootstraps, Horatio Alger stories:

Bill Clinton
John Edwards
Barack Obama
and now... Sonia Sotomayor

  Does anyone see a pattern here?

Luke 12:48 "to whom much is given, of him shall much be required". Would Jesus want progressive taxation, or regressive taxation?


[ Parent ]
Obama is schooling the Republicans (4.00 / 1)
There is a huge upside and as long as she is confirmed, very little downside. Also, not only does this bouy Hispanic support, but it brings the left-wing back into fold.  Nothing makes me fall in line behind the Democrats and Obama like right-wing racist attacks. It is so infuriating I feel myself forgetting all about the bailout and the absence of a single-payer health care plan in the midst of my rage against these bigoted Republicans.  It must be having a similar effect on others.  

Democrats - ALWAYS the lesser evil (0.00 / 0)
   You might want to read my post ("Obama is bad" - compared to whom?).
  Obama IS further to the Right than I would like. Obama is not a consistent Progressive, he is a moderate. The Democratic Party, as a whole, is also a bunch of centrist moderates.
  But anyone who starts to spout nonsense like "who cares about politics? Both parties are the same" should spend just one hour listening to the Republicans' real spokesperson, Rush Limbaugh. That will wake you up real quick.
  What will Democrats usually do, to help the middle class, the poor, women, and minorities? Not very much.
  What will the Republicans usually do to the middle class, the poor, women, and minorities? Actively try to oppress them, disempower them, and impoverish them.
  After 8 years of Clinton, the Left got complacent... and then we all had to suffer under 8 years of Bush. DO NOT let that happen, ever again.

Luke 12:48 "to whom much is given, of him shall much be required". Would Jesus want progressive taxation, or regressive taxation?

[ Parent ]
Napoleon said... (4.00 / 3)
"Never interrupt your enemy when he's making a mistake."  

"Sometimes I wonder whether the world is being run by smart people who are putting us on, or by imbeciles who really mean it." - Mark Twain

Yup, this is all pretty great (4.00 / 1)
But I'd love to see some solid blogosphere analysis on her record as a judge.  Most commentary has focused on the electoral implications, but she is going to be a supreme court justice for 20+ years and I'd like to know more about her philosophy.

But that's why Team Obama lead with her life story, to get exactly this discussion out there first.  Savvy, well-played.


Such analysis would be interesting (4.00 / 7)
I agree that such analysis would be interesting. However, the truth is that we are not going to start a campaign to try and stop her. Seriously--even if we did believe that she needed to be stopped, and that somehow stopping her meant she would be replaced by someone more progressive--there simply is no effective, or politically viable, way of pulling that off.

As such, the area where we can make a difference is by piling onto Republicans. There is a lot of territory to cover on that one. Also, it is both doable and fun!


[ Parent ]
Your point is well taken (4.00 / 1)
But I didn't mean it in the context of possibly trying to halt the nomination.  I meant it in the straightforward sense that she'll be making a lot of important decisions and I want to know more about her.

But you're wise to recognize the actionable moment.  That's why I like your blog.


[ Parent ]
I know what you mean (0.00 / 0)
but the time to fight that fight is before the president picks a nominee, not after.  I think it would be worth building the ground work for the next pick right now. But it will take time.  

One the of the most important things that can be done now to impact next time concerns how the Sotomayor pick gets sold. We need Democratic officials to stop selling her as a super-moderate, and stop pushing the "she was nominated by Bush I" thing. Justices of the SC are not the sole keepers of our liberties - a little judicial modesty is a good thing. But they are not automatons either - if judging was mechanical, there would be no need to have the judiciary as an independent co-equal branch of government.  

If anyone here is interested in thinking longer term on this, I would suggest checking out some of the stuff from the ACS - like Keeping the Faith (PDF) or the new Constitution in 2020.  

They are doing great work on constitutional issues, that get past tired, cliched ideas like strict vs loose construction, originalism vs living constitutionalism, activism vs restraint.  Until progressives are more familiar with these ideas, we will be outgunned when it comes to the Court.

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


[ Parent ]
Before nomination (4.00 / 3)
I agree.  In particular, I think we need to keep repeating the fact there are no liberals on the court today.  Where is our Warren or Marshall?  Right now we have conservatives and moderates, with Sotomayor clearly fitting in with the moderate wing.  We have a lopsided court and have had one for quite some time.

[ Parent ]
It also helps that we elected Barack Obama (4.00 / 1)
Instead of John McCain.  Because, frankly, I don't have the knowledge to look at potential nominees intelligently, so I have to put energy into electing a President I basically respect.

[ Parent ]
Interesting poll numbers from Rasmussen. (1.00 / 4)
As of today, the polling company shows that the dictator has a mere fifty-nine percent approval rating overall (source), a significant contrast to polls showing Obama at sixty-seven percent.

    05/29/2009

  • Strongly Approve - 37%

  • Strongly Disapprove - 27%

  • Total Approve - 59%

  • Total Disapprove - 40%

Yesterday the figures were 35% strong approval, 29% strong disapproval, 56% total approval, and 43% total disapproval.  Why are the numbers thus?  I think it represents the far more accurate reflection of public disapproval with Obama's continuing shift to the far right.  Obviously some of the disapproval numbers are coming from extreme right-wingers, the ditto-head segment; we cannot, however, discount the growing number of left-wingers outraged by the dashing of their hopes in the new president.



"The dictator"? (2.00 / 2)
Dude.

[ Parent ]
What would you call anyone who implements of continues Bush policies? (4.00 / 1)
On ranging from torture to illegal surveillance, and from illegal detention to interfering with the electoral process (in backing Specter) to prevent the will of the people from being expressed, Obama has taken positions that are dictatorial.  Hiding the truth (my comment) won't make it go away.



[ Parent ]
I uprated Michael's previously disappeared comment above. (4.00 / 1)
Mr. Kwiatkowski is farther to the left than most of the posters here, but as far as I can tell, his comment didn't violate any of the site rules, and he is by no means a "troll" merely posting to make trouble.

Hundreds of his other comments and diaries all over the internet attest to the sincerity of his political opinions, however much they may offend the majority here.

Free speech in the United States began with calling George III a "dictator," and eighteenth-century radicals like Tom Paine and Patrick Revere was probably temperamentally more like Michael Kwiatowski that the typical university-bourgeois commenter on the liberal blogosphere.



[ Parent ]
Already done. (0.00 / 0)
At any rate, you know for a fact that my comment did not violate site rules.  So do "fbihop" and "TValley."  The three of you abused the rating system because you balked at the use of a single word, one that is demonstrably applicable to Obama and the shrub before him.  You offered neither a rebuttal or any sort of argument to try and refute what I wrote - you simply decided to suppress a comment because you didn't like a word.  That is a gross abuse of the rating system.



[ Parent ]
What about women? (0.00 / 0)
I'm sure that they gave Obama a bump since they approve of Sotomayor at a higher rate than men.

-New Mexico politics from the local perspective.

The Ends Don't Justify The Means (0.00 / 0)
and ripping the scab off of old wounds is not how I would choose to win votes.

Nor is it sustainable...we've gone to the well to often. We need to have a philsophy and platform that attracts majorities across all races.


. (4.00 / 2)
The most important thing to remember is that this support is necessarily fleeting. The most impactful issue for most of the hispanic community is going to be immigration. And without committing to meaningful immigration reform the joy over appointments will fade (as well it should in that event)

But that aside, hell yeah, keep the fight going. Let republicans show their true colors.

I like this particular gem by Rush Limbaugh:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/ho...

RUSH:  I want her to start providing some justice.  I want her walking up those marble steps and I want her to start providing some justice.  Meaning, it ain't justice coming out of there now.  I want her walking up those steps, and I want her to start providing some justice.  Street talk.  This is the talk of somebody angry.

Keep em comin Rush.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox