Anti-Abortion Terrorists--Voice of A Violent Minority

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sun May 31, 2009 at 19:30


The murder of Dr. George Tiller is evidence of the re-emergence of violent rightwing extremism, which many observers expected in the wake of Bush & Cheney's exit from the White House.  Indeed, a report released in April, Rightwing Extremism: Current. Economic and Political Climate Fueling. Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment (pdf), was subject to rightwing backlash, precisely because it accurately focused attention on the potential for increased rightwing terrorism at this time.    While it didn't focus specifically on anti-abortion activists, it has been ten years since the last abortion provider was murdered.  While the numbers of violent rightwing activists can be measured in the thousands, they are representative of a much larger segment of the population, measuring in the millions.  However, this still represents only a relatively small political fringe in the total electorate, as can be seen by this chart, showing that total opposition to all abortions encompasses roughly one in 11 Americans, and one in seven Republicans:

(Source: General Social Survey. Interactively generated by author, May 31, 2009, Sun 03:04 PM PDT. Filtered for years 2000-2008.)

Abthreat is a combined scale, measuring attitudes toward abortion in case of rape, threat to the health of the mother, or significant birth defect.

Paul Rosenberg :: Anti-Abortion Terrorists--Voice of A Violent Minority
Obviously, there are many people who oppose abortion in all three cases who are equally horrified at the murder of Dr. Tiller.  Yet, it seems safe to say that virtually no one supports or feels sympathy for his murderer who supports abortion in such cases.  Thus, containing, and preventing the spread of such violence crucially depends on leadership from within this relatively small demographic--particularly the Republican base.

Given the record of extremist rhetoric used in talking about abortion--epitomized by the open hostility expressed toward President Obama surrounding his commencement speech at Notre Dame--the prospects for such responsible leadership are not good.  On the other hand, the support expressed for President Obama in the face of such hostility--up to and including support shown while he was giving his speech--suggests that there is a powerful moderating influence among the general population, waiting to be tapped and mobilized.

How that can potential influence can be brought to bear to curb the threat of anti-abortion violence is far from clear, particularly in the immediate aftermath of Dr. Tiller's murder.  But the numbers above strongly suggest that anti-abortion terrorism can be marginalized and curbed if there is a genuine political will for standing together as one people.  This is how the actions of a violent extreme relate back to the dominant discourse of a still powerful minority who refuse to recognize, and constructively work with those who have been chosen to lead our country at the ballot box.

In short, it really is up to the GOP leadership--to step up, and show some leadership as Americans.  If they do not, we may well see our country enter a period of escalating political violence, and there will be no doubt whatsoever who is politically responsible.


Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

All the "abortion is murder" crowd have earned a share of the blame for this (4.00 / 2)
I dunno about anybody else, but every time I hear one of our so-called civic and religious "leaders" or their followers utter the preposterous claim that medical professionals who do their jobs to protect the health of women are "killers" I know that I am hearing an endorsement, an encouragement, a justification for exactly this kind of act.  

"If you want that good feeling that comes from doing things for other people, then you have to pay for it in abuse and misunderstanding..."
Zora Neale Hurston


How this will play out is so predictable (4.00 / 3)
There will be calls for the DoJ, FBI & DHS to step up efforts to prevent such violence and keep track of potential perpetrators, which they will do (and likely would have done even absent such calls, because this is what they're supposed to do--protect Americans from violent nutjobs of whatever persuasion).

The far right, feeling persecuted and seeing a great opening to rally their followers, will scream "Racial profiling! They're targeting white Christian men who own guns! Liberal fascism! They're taking away out rights!". Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh et al will scream about this 24/7.

The media will pick up on this and feature segments asking "Is the government overreacting to a few isolated cases of RW violence? Are we headed for a police state? Pat Buchanan will be on next to discuss this alarming new development".

They will tie it to the Sotomayor nomination, claiming that she's going to rabidly support this liberal fascist police state that seeks to marginalize white Christian men who own guns and promote a radical left-wing pro-illegal alien, abortion on demand, anti-gun, anti-family values agenda. And the media will feed right into it, pretending that these are legitimate accusations that need to be seriously considered. Mika and Joe will express their deepest "concern" over whether Obama might not be going too far. Tweety will fondle Tom Tancredo's leg on Hardball. Rachel, Keith, Jon, Stephen, Greenwald and Digby will, of course, totally mock all this and rip it to shreds. And no one will care, because it's all about the noise, not the substance.

And Dems will back down, bit by bit, voting for blatantly political "Up with Americans" resolutions in congress, apologizing to white Christian men who own guns and their leaders, urging the DoJ, FBI and DHS to back off and let them be. And so on.

I.e. past is prologue. It's so depressingly predictable. And until Dems and decent people of all political and ideological persuasions other than these ACTUAL fascists stand up to it, they will make inroads, and get Dems to back down. Incidents such as this are what they view as fundraising and political agitation bonanzas. Such is their craven sociopathology.

Paddy Chavevsky predicted all this over 30 years ago.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


You couldn't be more right (0.00 / 0)
The so called Democrats have no 'nads,  They have become useless. The designated players of both parties play their roles.  They foam at the mouth.  They scream.  They get donations.  They meet behind the curtain in restaurants and laugh at those outside the beltway.

They nod when the hounds of hell take a sacrifice, like today.

Jump out of the pot, simmering frogs, this isn't a Jacuzzi.


[ Parent ]
You have a point, but a broad public movement would help. (4.00 / 1)
You can't simply rely on the Obama administration, and other authorities, to do the right thing. There has to be a broad movement of people standing up against the hate mongering, and getting active in hunting the terrorists down. As I see it, even among the pro choice crowd, there is too much tolerance towards the supporters of this "christian" terrorism, maybe out of false concerns about the first ammendment. That's understandable, but still wrong.

Advocating the killing of a human being is a punishbale crime, nobody should be in any doubt about this. So, every single case should be communicated to the authorities. They are in a much better position to decide if this is a case of freedom of speech, or the public "tip of an iceberg", someone supporting terrorism. Stopping the spreading of this fanatism that creates active terorrists is everybodys duty! So, no false tolerance, pls, don't enable terrorist propaganda, actively help in bringing the terrorists and their enablers to justice. And by taking a determined, public stance against this terrorism you will also make the media think twice about their stance. Only a broad public support for zero tolerance against the fanatics will ensure that the situation really changes. So, don't hesitate, pls, do your part in changing public perception!


[ Parent ]
And the open support for this terrorism still goes on! (4.00 / 1)
At a discussion thread at BlueOregon, someone naming himself "John Scott" advocates the "killing" of "mass murderers" (in this conetext, abortion doctors). Such moral support of terrorism, which may be only the public face of more direct support, wouldn't be tolerated if this was about Al Quaeda. About time federal authorities drop their double standard and follow a rigorous policy of zero tolerance towards anit abortion terrorists and their enablers. I recommend to alert the authorities if anyone advocates the murder of abortion supporters here, without any false concers about first ammendment rights. Give the authorities all available informations, and let them decide if this is legal free speech, or a case that hast to be investigated and prosecuted!

"containing, and preventing the spread of such violence crucially depends" (4.00 / 1)
not only on the leadership doing the right thing, imho, but on everyone to apply zero tolerance on the hate mongerers! Alert the authorities about every single case of an anti abortion fanatic advocating the murder of pro choice doctors and supporters, pls. Tolerance and concerns about first ammendment rights only enable the spreading of this fanatism. You simply can't know if a nutcase is only a loudmouth, or a criminal conducting terrorist acts. Don't become an accomplice, get active in hunting those murders and their supporters down! Pointing fingers at leadership is too easy, and not good enough to nip this in the bud. Everyone can do something to stop this, so don't hesitate, help the authorities in exposing the terrorists!

[ Parent ]
a Muslim activist (0.00 / 1)
shot up a military recruiting center yesterday killing one soldier and wounding another.  I suppose under your theory of terroist we should label all Muslims terroist.  Lets hunt every Muslim down and expose their radical views.  

This is not the answer.  you simply can't label everyone into one category.  There are extremist in all walks of life and in just about every social and political group in existence.  


You want to pretend (0.00 / 0)
that rightwing domestic terrorists do not exist? Sorry but there is too much evidence to the contrary.

And it's only going to get worse, with Democrats back in control of the government. When the Right controls the government, they use it for violence (such as imperial war, and torture) and when they lose control of the government they turn around and use violence against it and their perceived enemies -- women, gays, minorities and immigrants.

It's who they are, it's what they do.

Montani semper liberi


[ Parent ]
He is a troll (0.00 / 0)


--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
What Are You Talking About? (0.00 / 0)
I didn't label everyone opposed to abortion a terrorist.  I didn't even say that about the hardcore opponents of abortion in case of rape, severe birth defects or threat to the health of the mother.

To the contrary, I specifically stated that many of them were obviously horrified:

While the numbers of violent rightwing activists can be measured in the thousands, they are representative of a much larger segment of the population, measuring in the millions.  However, this still represents only a relatively small political fringe in the total electorate....

Obviously, there are many people who oppose abortion in all three cases who are equally horrified at the murder of Dr. Tiller.

So, are sniffing glue, or what?


"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox