Don't Ask, Don't Tell About Coal Ash Hazard

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sun Jun 14, 2009 at 19:30


On December 22, 2008, a retaining wall burst at the Tennessee Valley Authority's Kingston coal-fired power plant, releasing more than a billion gallons of coal combustion waste-a volume of ash and water was 100 times greater than the amount of oil spilled in the Exxon Valdez disaster.  The water flooded more than 300 acres, and the cleanup cost has  been estimated at over a billion dollars.

There are 44 coal combustion waste sites nationwide that EPA has identified as posing a "high hazard", but on Friday, Senator Barbara Boxer said in a press conference that the EPA says the locations cannot be released to the public--although it has notified local officials, including first responders.

EPA's refusal came after consultation with the Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of  Homeland Security.  Boxer praised the EPA for it's swift action in collecting the information, but strongly criticized the refusal to make the information public:

However, I am concerned that the EPA, after consulting with the Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Homeland Security, has indicated that they cannot make the list of "high hazard" sites public.

We are pursuing whether the handling of these sites is consistent with the handling of other similar facilities, because of the critical importance of the public's right to know about threats in their communities. If these sites are so hazardous and if the neighborhoods nearby could be harmed irreparably, then I believe it is essential to let people know.

In that way, they can press their local authorities who have responsibility for their safety to act now to make the sites safer.

This sort of secrecy was SOP under Bush/Cheney.  Is it yet more "change we can believe in"?

This sort of Cheneyesque action has become so routine it's like it's not even eyebrow-raising any more.  Of course, there's not just a public right to know issue here.  There's also the fact that people alerted to such dangers could help contribute to grassroots opposition to further bogus "clean coal" scams, and the like.  So it really raises questions about who's responsible for such decisions, and what sort of corporate or industry connections they might have.

Paul Rosenberg :: Don't Ask, Don't Tell About Coal Ash Hazard

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
What an absurd abuse of secrecy (0.00 / 0)
This blog post alone probably reveals (in text and links) the location of a dozen or two coal combustion waste sites.
http://blog.skytruth.org/2009/...

Much less the fact a trail of dust disposal could easily be followed by anyone from any coal smokestack site.

I abhor abuse of secrecy... and this clearly crosses any reasonable line.

Makes one wonder if this stuff isn't much worse than we are led to believe?


I Think It's Less About Specific Info (0.00 / 0)
And more about how it could impact the public, seeing all 44 sites on a government list.  Which, in a way, makes the withholding all the more sinister.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
Why is coal ash dangerous in the first place? (0.00 / 0)
Isn't ash better for the environment than releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere? Looks like it comes with some other problems:
Crystalline silica and lime along with toxic chemicals are among the exposure concerns. Although industry has claimed that fly ash is "neither toxic nor poisonous," this is disputed. Exposure to fly ash through skin contact, inhalation of fine particle dust and drinking water may well present health risks. The National Academy of Sciences noted in 2007 that "the presence of high contaminant levels in many CCR (coal combustion residue) leachates may create human health and ecological concerns."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...

OK, the jury is still out, not definite judgment yet. However, of course there should be an open discussion about this, and people should have the informations they need to avoid exposure they may deem risky. The secrecy by EPA and DHS only seems to work to the advantage of the energy industry, and is against the interest of the people. Yup, looks like Bush's environmental policies are still going strong.


Lift the ban on Industrial Hemp...Grow Here Grow Now..! (0.00 / 0)
    We can use Industrial Hemp to replace even coal, in the form of Charcoal, as well as Ethanol and get bio diesel from it's seeds..!

   I wrote this up already but the computer jumped and posted it on another topic..on Iran sorry but I did click on this story...I hate when that happens...

   Go to Hemp 4 Fuel.com

    http://hemp4fuel.com/

   Grow Here, Grow Now...

     "Ours is not a system based upon trust but one of suspicion.."  Thomas Jefferson


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox