Why Is A White Supremacist Leading The Charge Against Sotomayor IN THE SENATE?

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sun Jul 05, 2009 at 09:00


I was going to write a diary about this.  But then I came across this clip from Rachel Maddow, from a show that I somehow had missed. It hits all the high points I had in mind, and I don't have to go searching through archives of the NY Times from the 1980s.

Answer to the question I asked: Because that's the way the GOP wants it.

[Update on the Flip:] Some detail on his record prosecuting black voter registration activists for "voter fraud" in the 1980s.

Paul Rosenberg :: Why Is A White Supremacist Leading The Charge Against Sotomayor IN THE SENATE?
Back in 2002, when the strange phenomena of anti-racist conservative bloggers helped drive Trent Lott from power (hint: he was too prone to striking deals with the Dems), The New Republic ran a piece by Sarah Wildman "Closed Sessions", asking, "Hey, anti-racist conservatives, what about Jeff Sessions?"

His record on race arguably rivals that of the gentleman from Mississippi--and yet has elicited not a peep of consternation from the anti-racist right.

The whole thing's worth a read, but here's the part that really takes me back, because, even in those pre-internet days, thanks to Pacifica radio, and other alternative media, I was well aware of Sessions and his racist shenanigans even before Reagan tried to appoint him as a federal judge:

Sessions was U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama. The year before his nomination to federal court, he had unsuccessfully prosecuted three civil rights workers--including Albert Turner, a former aide to Martin Luther King Jr.--on a tenuous case of voter fraud. The three had been working in the "Black Belt" counties of Alabama, which, after years of voting white, had begun to swing toward black candidates as voter registration drives brought in more black voters. Sessions's focus on these counties to the exclusion of others caused an uproar among civil rights leaders, especially after hours of interrogating black absentee voters produced only 14 allegedly tampered ballots out of more than 1.7 million cast in the state in the 1984 election. The activists, known as the Marion Three, were acquitted in four hours and became a cause cèlèbre. Civil rights groups charged that Sessions had been looking for voter fraud in the black community and overlooking the same violations among whites, at least partly to help reelect his friend Senator Denton.

He is, in short, the lowest form of racist party hack.  And that is, in fact, the foundation of his political career.  He was a Sarah Palin-like figure, persecuted by the mean old DC establishment for standing up for the good people of his home state:

He was elected attorney general in 1994. Once in office, he was linked with a second instance of investigating absentee ballots and fraud that directly impacted the black community. He was also accused of not investigating the church burnings that swept the state of Alabama the year he became attorney general. But those issues barely made a dent in his 1996 Senate campaign, when Heflin retired and Sessions ran for his seat and won.

Welcome to the GOP's leading voice on the subject of justice in the US Senate.


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Who stole my tambourine? (0.00 / 0)
Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III? I suppose that The Third is something of an explanation, but Jesus, the guy is three years younger than I am. You'd think he'd have learned something from living through the Sixties, even in Alabama.

RM is right, though. In the face of evidence like this, it's surely getting harder for the Republican Party to deny that racism is the only plank left in its platform. That should be an occasion for rejoicing, one would think, but If the result really is the great re-alignment you've written about in the past, I'm not so sure that I'm ready to shout Hallelujah! just yet. I'm still trying to sort out what we've gained, exactly, if forty of our sixty Democratic senators are actually fugitive Republicans, and our President is an African-American version of Herbert Hoover.

As are we all, I suppose. Some of my friends -- the more level-headed types with views similar to those of Chris and Mike -- think that I'm overstating my case to the point of caricature. Believe it or not, I hope that they're right. I don't mind being proven a fool if it's in a good cause. Except around the edges of policy, though -- net neutrality, and anti-pollution oversight, etc. -- and in the ranks of lower-level appointments, I frankly don't see many signs of hope.

My concern is that massively dysfunctional institutions can't continue to be dysfunctional forever, particularly in times as dangerous as those we're facing now. If the body of progressive thinking, from Chomsky to Moyers, say, were closer to being embodied in a political movement with some potential for taking real power, I'd certainly sleep better at night.

On the other hand, if Senator Sessions and his pitiful Robert E. Lee impressions do in fact represent nothing more the darkness before the dawn, and I see signs of that dawn which don't turn out to be Rahm Emanuel shining a MagLite in my eyes, I'll be happy to shout Hallelujah! after all. So far, though....


The Democrats Are Like George Bush, The Elder (4.00 / 2)
as described by Ann Richards, after the last two elections.  She said he was "born on third base, and thought he hit a triple."  Like Bush, they're done nothing to deserve their success, just been there when the GOP failed massively.  And since they owe their success to doing nothing, then why shouldn't they just keep on doing nothing now?

After all, it is the key to their success.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox