Traders Back To Their Old Tricks

by: Mike Lux

Mon Jul 06, 2009 at 15:00


More evidence that the big financial conglomerates on Wall Street are back to their old tricks: check out this article from Naked Capitalism. The money paragraphs are at the end of the post where they quote from the Lex Column:

Those clever investment bankers are at it again. It was surely only a matter of time before banks tried to apply their financial innovation skills to finding ways of profiting from the very crisis that misuse of those skills brought about...

On one level, such initiatives might be welcomed as industry practitioners try to find a market solution to their own problems, reducing the need for taxpayer-funded bail-outs. But there are dangers here. As studies of the origins of the financial crisis such as the UK's Turner Review have concluded, one of the keys to creating a sounder banking system is increasing the quantity and quality of bank capital - which also, of course, means lower returns. Since the new schemes being developed are designed to cut the capital cost of risky assets, they potentially go against the spirit of such proposals.

As I have written before, the big banks, having been resuscitated without having been restructured, are quickly going back to what caused the financial crisis in the first place. We need to fundamentally change the system: realign the incentives, regulate the hell out of trading, and break up these too-big-to-fail companies so that even if they make reckless gambles, the consequences don't come raining down on the rest of us.

Will the new regulations proposed by the Obama administration help? Yes, they add some additional protections, but they don't go nearly far enough. We need to fundamentally restructure this system.

Mike Lux :: Traders Back To Their Old Tricks

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Apocalypso no. 387 (0.00 / 0)
At least that's the number given in my edition of the hymnal. The text says, What are our chances? Slim to none. If we're not cop, we're little people. (And please don't ask for me to hum it. By now, we should all know the score.)

Meanwhile, as we huddle together, awaiting the inevitable consequences of our betters' folly, we could start sharpening our pitchforks and dipping our torches in a fresh vat of tar. I mean, singing hymns is okay, but faith without works is a lazy person's religion.


We Need to Fundamentally Restructure the Power Structure (4.00 / 1)
that led to the banking/financial monolith that rules not only our economy and the global economy but our government as well.

That will take a Progressive Revolution.

More later. . .


a small problem (4.00 / 1)
hearing this of course makes my blood boil, knowing full well that this was an expected outcome of the resuscitation strategy. none of this is to excuse obama and his administration, which is too tied to wall street and their economic logic.  

the problem, however, lies in the fact that obama had a dilema - try to do a thorough restructuring while the economy was teetering or resuscitate and hope to make the changes over the coming years.  they picked the second option and we're seeing that play out now.

unfortunately, i don't think either option for from their POV.  if you try to restructure in the midst of free-fall the margin for error is very small and the last thing they wanted to do upon taking office was to have even more financial system shocks.  so they decided to go with the second, surely expecting that everything they would do would require a slog.

we should remember that FDR came in 3 years after the crash when the entire banking system had already collapsed.  the power of the elites was at an amazing ebb.  that gave him the space to do things differently.


Very good point (4.00 / 1)
re FDR. The Wall St lobby is arguably more powerful at this point than any other lobbying force in American history.  

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox