Robert McNamara: A Case Study in Redemption

by: The Opportunity Agenda

Tue Jul 07, 2009 at 17:01


The recent passing of Robert McNamara provides us with a critical opportunity to reflect on redemption, one of our most deeply held values.  As an architect of the Vietnam War, McNamara is inextricably linked to one of the most controversial events in recent U.S. foreign policy.  For some, the War, particularly its brutality, will be Mr. McNamara's only legacy.  To others, though, he serves as a powerful example of the human capacity to change and grow.

The Opportunity Agenda :: Robert McNamara: A Case Study in Redemption

To many, Mr. McNamara's position as Secretary of Defense in the first seven years of the War means that the blood of the millions of individuals who died in the conflict will be forever on his hands.  Certainly, history will remember this more vividly than, for example, his efforts to eliminate racial and gender discrimination in the military.  And, the Vietnam War will always overshadow Mr. McNamara's more humanitarian post-Defense work, including international poverty alleviation efforts, lobbying for the elimination of nuclear weapons, and opposition to the 2003 U.S. Invasion of Iraq. 


To Mr. McNamara's detractors, his post-military career does little to atone for his sins.  Perhaps this is true, but redemption is not about accounting for crimes or doling out retribution.  Rather, redemption involves acknowledging that fallibility is inherent to the human condition, and that we all deserve the opportunity to show the world that we can learn from our mistakes.  By this standard, we owe Mr. McNamara, if nothing else, the acknowledgement that his legacy is complex.


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Another perspective from Alexander Cockburn (0.00 / 0)
http://www.counterpunch.org/co...

He specifically covers the nuclear weapons and work for the poor issues btw:

McNamara played a crucial, enabling role in the arms race in nuclear missiles

Says his work for then poor was more bloody than his wars:

the McNamara of the World Bank evolved naturally, organically, from the McNamara of Vietnam. The one was prolegomenon to the other, the McNamara-sponsored horrors in Vietnam perhaps on a narrower and more vivid scale, but ultimately lesser in dimension and consequence.

In my view the guy was a total rat through and through.  No redeeming features, no repentance.


Chomsky on McNamara (0.00 / 0)
"What were the misgivings? The misgivings were that it might not succeed. Suppose that some Nazi general came around after Stalingrad and said, 'I realized after Stalingrad it was a mistake to fight a two-front war, but I did it anyway.' That's not the Nuremberg defense. That's not even recognizing that a crime was committed. You've got to recognize that a crime was committed before you give a defense. McNamara can't perceive that. Furthermore, I don't say that as a criticism of McNamara. He is a dull, narrow technocrat who questioned nothing. He simply accepted the framework of beliefs of the people around him. And that's their framework. That's the Kennedy liberals. We cannot commit a crime. It's contradiction in terms. Anything we do is by necessity not only right, but noble. Therefore, there can't be a crime..."

http://www.chomsky.info/books/...


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox