Is the Left blogosphere afraid of the Kerry tasering incident?

by: geopolitics and beer

Wed Sep 19, 2007 at 10:47


Yesterday morning a coworker informed me of the tasering incident at the University of Florida where John Kerry was giving a speech.  The video was horrifying--I understand that we can all disagree on the parameters of civil discourse, procedural ethics, and whether or not this is a free speech issue, but I was most disturbed that four police officers pinned down a young man and proceeded to taser him after he pleaded for them not to. 

I'm not writing this diary to discuss the incident per se, but because I'm shocked that I can't find a single prominent left blogger (I've checked Kos, Think Progress, Crooks and Liars, and obviously Open Left...not exhaustive, i know, but they're my regular rounds) taking this issue on.  Doesn't this open up an opportunity to discuss the boundaries of the police state, not to mention some very important ethical issues?  Am I alone in thinking that the blogosphere is in a bind--they don't want to discuss tasering because it might require a sharp criticism of Kerry's (essentially) nonresponse to the situation?  Are liberal bloggers afraid to talk about tasering?

Even Tucker Carlson is condemning this for God's sake. 

Why won't Kerry call for the cops to be fired for using excessive force?  Of course I don't consider Kerry responsible for the tasering, but he has the power to rectify this situation somewhat but he doesn't have the will to do it.  He's a classic "lame liberal" right now. 

geopolitics and beer :: Is the Left blogosphere afraid of the Kerry tasering incident?

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Be careful in analysis. Watch the footage from all angles. (0.00 / 0)
The man was tazered because he was resisting arrest and the police had trouble putting the handcuffs on both hands.

They could have been more patient when putting handcuffs on him but everything that the police did was lawful.

I you want health care, work hard. If you want universal health care, vote for liberals.


The police (0.00 / 0)
asked him to come with them peacefully, he resisted and acted as if they'd tasered him even before they did. 

The police asked him to cooperate peacefully and warned him that if he didn't they would taser him.  He ignored their warnings. 

When they did what they told him they were going to do, he acted as if this was out of the blue.  It wasn't..

This is just another spoiled kid who grew up without any consequences and is stunned, stunned I tell you that he actually received one.

As for the tasering as a means to control him?...Well, I don't know how I feel about that.


This proves my point. (0.00 / 0)
The blogosphere is turning this into a referendum on the kid's character (I don't care if he was an attention seeking jerk, a Laruchite, or a Republican).  This is the same logic that people use to argue that permiscuous women deserve to be raped.

It's not resisting arrest when it's an unlawful arrest to begin with.  To say the police acted within codified parameters merely furthers the "police state" argument--that cops have far too much power. 

Europeans don't stand for this shit.  Stop calling yourself a member of the Left if you don't passionately believe in civil liberties.  Call yourself what you are--a Centrist.

And to respond to above--I have watched all angles.  I see four to six cops tasering a kid on the ground who is NOT being violent (though understandably emotionally distressed).  I've seen video (one of the lesser circulating youtube videos) that contradicts all the "eyewitness" reports that claim Meyer cut off another student.  John Kerry personally called on Meyer, he asked a series of aggressive questions (some quite good ones in there) but because of his tone of voice and persistence (which I've seen a hundred times at such events) he gets arrested?  Please defend that. 

Those cops abused their power.  They had no right to arrest him to begin with, therefore it was not "violently" resisting arrest. 

"An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery." (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox