2010 Senate Outlook: Republicans Draw Even

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Jul 30, 2009 at 13:15


While glimpsing at my blackberry during vacation, I was eager to put up a new Senate forecast upon arriving back in Philadelphia. Senate forecasting isn't the biggest news right now, but all of the developments over the past three weeks made this an essential piece of housekeeping.

The current forecast shows no net partisan change in the Senate, as Democratic gains in Ohio and Missouri are offset by losses in Connecticut and Delaware. Further, the number of close campaigns is increasing. As the chart below shows, about a handful of campaigns on both sides could also potentially switch. Due significantly to better candidate recruiting, Republicans have a slight advantage in the number of close, potential pickups they have created.

The complete forecast, including colorful charts, more causes for Republican improvement, and implications for ongoing legislative fights, can be found in the extended entry.

Chris Bowers :: 2010 Senate Outlook: Republicans Draw Even
Current 2010 Senate Outlook: No net partisan seat change
Republican-Held Seats
Democratic Pickups: 2 (Missouri and Ohio)
State Type Democrat Republican Margin #Polls
Ohio
OH Primary Fisher +4.5 2
OH Open Fisher Portman D 9.0 3
OH Open Brunner Portman D 5.3 3
Missouri
MO Open Carnahan Blunt D 4.3 3
Kentucky
KY Primary Mongiardo +15.0 1
KY Open Conway Grayson D 1.5 2
KY Open Mongiardo Grayson R 2.5 2
New Hampshire
NH Open Hodes* Ayotte R 2.5 2
Louisiana
LA Incumbent Melancon Vitter R 9.5 2

Also of note...
State Type Democrat Republican Margin #Polls
North Carolina
NC Incumbent Generic Burr D +3.0 1
Texas
TX Special None yet None yet None yet 1
Keep an eye on Florida as well, if Republican Governor Charlie Crist faces trouble in his primary against Marco Rubio.

Democratic-Held Seats
Democratic Losses: 2 (Delaware and Connecticut)
State Type Democrat Republican Margin #Polls
Delaware
DE Special Biden* Castle* R 14.5 2
Connecticut
CT Incumbent Dodd* Simmons* R 9.0 2
Illinois
IL Special Giannoulis* Kirk* D 4.0 2
California
CA Incumbent Boxer Fiorina** D 4.0 1
Colorado
CO Special Bennet Frazier D 4.0 1
CO Special Bennet Buck D 6.0 1
Pennsylvania
PA Primary Specter +23.7 3
PA Incumbent Specter Toomey D 7.0 3
PA Incumbent Sestak Toomey D 1.0 1
Arkansas**
AR Incumbent Lincoln Primary D 9.5 1

Also of note...
State Type Democrat Challenger Margin #Polls
New York
NY Primary Gillibrand Maloney M +3.3 4
Nevada
NV Incumbent Reid Re-elect R 10.0 1
Russ Feingold's seat in Wisconsin, and Patty Murray's in Washington, are two other campaigns to watch.)

Notes:
*= Faces primary, but heavy favorite
**= Not an announced canddiate at this time
***= There is no polling in Arkansas for Lincoln against any of the numerous announced Republican candidates. So, polling on Lincoln vs. other candidates, who are probably equally unknown, is listed instead.)

It has been a long time--over four years--since I put together an electoral forecast of any sort that did not predict Democratic gains. This is partially due to Democrats now controlling large majorities, and thus having fewer potential targets. As I mentioned above, a Republican advantage in recruiting is another factor. States like Arizona (no Napolitano), Connecticut (Simmons), Florida (Crist), Illinois (no Madigan), Kansas (no Sebelius), Kentucky (no Bunning), New Hampshire (Ayotte) and North Carolina (no Cooper) are all examples of the Republican recruiting edge to date.

It is also a sign that the political environment is deteriorating for Democrats somewhat. As the economy continues to worsen, expect the Republican position to continue to improve, albeit slowly. Given that Democrats are easily scared into voting like conservatives, this is why Republicans want to delay major legislation as long as possible. Come September or October, Republicans might be forecast to pick up a seat or two. This is will likely make good legislation even more difficult to pass.

If Democrats lose any seats at all in 2010, expect an even more conservative trifecta running D.C. than we have seen so far in 2009.


Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Why Delaware? (0.00 / 0)
Delaware is only competitive if Carper runs, at this point I think it's more likely that he retires

Castle (4.00 / 4)
Sorry, meant Castle not Carper duh!

[ Parent ]
I would add California to this list (4.00 / 1)
and in saying that, I think an enourmous red flag should be raised.

Boxer's re-elect in March was 43 yes 44 no in a Field Poll.  I am very suspicious of the Rasmussen numbers, but the most recent one taken July 24 shows Boxer leading Fiorna 45-41.

That is two straight polls showing Boxer is in some ways vulnerable.  I am not predicting that she will lose, but it shows pretty clearly that this is a pretty volatile electorate.

If the economy doesn't recover, there is a potential landslide next year.  The numbers from California suggest just how big that landslide might be.


Things look all right on the ground (4.00 / 2)
Boxer is an expert campaigner. She has often been down in the polls in the summer, only to come roaring back in the fall with a fierce offense and exquisitely timed TV ads. This happened when she edged out Bruce Herschensohn in her first election (by 4 points), and it happened again in her reelection campaign against Matt Fong (10 points). Her most recent reelection, running against the decent but hapless Robert Jones, was a laugher (20 points).

Carly Fiorina is a flawed and arrogant candidate. If she runs, Boxer will expose every one of those flaws. It will be a real race, but I would be amazed if Boxer lost it. If Fiorina doesn't run, there's probably no race at all.

It never hurts to worry, but I think this race will be OK.


[ Parent ]
Carly Fiorina destroyed HP... (4.00 / 3)
...and she outsourced most of her workforce...  She's extremely damaged goods...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
Missed that one (0.00 / 0)
Will add

[ Parent ]
There is cause for concern here, but... (4.00 / 2)
I'm not as worried as perhaps I should be.

Boxer's reelect numbers have never looked great 15-18 months out. She had similar numbers in 1997 and 2003. She is a solid campaigner, can mobilize the base (unlike DiFi, who is going to face a massive revolt in 2012), and won't have any trouble raising money. Boxer's been raising money for this race for years, first when she thought she might face Arnold Schwarzenegger, and now with the Carly Fiorina threat out there.

Fiorina isn't all that well known by the voters. On the one hand that means her support could be soft, but on the other hand it's a sign that Boxer genuinely has cause for worry since this shows voters might well be inclined to elect a so-called moderate Republican.

Boxer will also be hurt by the blowback from the looming catastrophic failure of the Democratic trifecta to pass any meaningful legislation this year.

My guess is this plays out like 1994, where DiFi faced down Michael Huffington (Arianna's ex) in what was at the time the most expensive Senate race ever. DiFi eked out a 2 point victory with less than 50% of the vote.

Boxer will have to work hard for her victory next year. She is as well aware of that as anyone. So while this is going to be a big fight, I have confidence we can hold this seat.


[ Parent ]
Maybe the Dems could stop s*cking? (4.00 / 3)
Just a thought.

I am in earnest -- I will not equivocate -- I will not excuse -- I will not retreat a single inch -- AND I WILL BE HEARD.  

Welcome back, Chris ;-) (0.00 / 0)
Sorry!

(I don't know if you got our congratulatory tweet, but I did send one.)

I am in earnest -- I will not equivocate -- I will not excuse -- I will not retreat a single inch -- AND I WILL BE HEARD.  


[ Parent ]
Full Senate Forecast Overview (0.00 / 0)
Including  OpenLeft, SSP, Rothenberg, CQ, Cook and others at DemConWatch. Current average forecast is for a gain of 1.4 seats. Delaware is one big difference between Chris' forecast and all the others. If Castle doesn't run, Chris would be at a Dem gain of 1 seat, consistent with the consensus.

DemConWatch

I think that the stronger Republicans look overall... (0.00 / 0)
The less likely Castle runs...  He really wants to retire.. he just feels guilty doing so... he doesn't want to hurt the party when he's down...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
Fixable at one level (0.00 / 0)
Many of the Democrats' woes are attributable to poor candidates.  Do you really think Dodd will go unchallenged if his numbers are this bad in a few more months?  Dodd certainly does not have the baggage of say Vitter but, for some reason he has become radioactive.  It is already time for Plan B (Blumenthal).

Similarly, I don't think that Bennet will go unchallenged.  He was a lousy choice and he is trying unsuccessfully to hide his anti-union, right-wing views.  Bennet can run (for nomination) but he can't hide. (Was that Muhammed Ali talkin' there?)

Ayotte will either piss off the Republican base or start losing the independents.  Either way she is untested.  The AG post is appointive.  Look for some gaffes and a slide.

Specter is a clear winner over Toomey and his Progressive Punch numbers are going up.  I think he will be re-elected as a Democrat.  If Admiral Joe is strong enough to take out Specter, Sestak will ride the bounce to a victory in November.

That said, we are looking at perhaps plus two or three instead of the plus five or six just six months ago.

If the economy continues to reel and nothing seems to be done about it, we might fall further back towards zero.  Darn those stinking Blue Dogs.  If Bennet falls in the general, I won't be too sorry.


Low GOP name rec creates an opening (0.00 / 0)
One thing about these numbers is that a lot of the Dems in competitive races are better-known than the Republicans.  This gives the Republicans room for growth, but it also means the Dems will have a lot of opportunities to define them negatively.

For instance, on the Dem side, the only ones of our candidates who aren't well known statewide are Melancon and Sestak.  Good luck to the Republicans trying to negatively define the Hurricane Hero and a two-star admiral.  By contrast, Portman, Ayotte, Simmons, Kirk, Fiorina, Frazier, Buck, and (incredibly) Burr are all relative unknowns to statewide voters.  All of them except possibly Frazier and Buck have long and controversial track records and can be defined easily by negative DSCC campaigning.  Toomey, Blunt, and Vitter can also have their numbers driven down significantly if voters are reminded what's bad about them.

The key here is that there are very, very few Kay Hagans in these races -- unknowns with lots of room for growth.  Both Dems and Republicans have long track records that can be used against them, but voters generally know what's bad about the Dems but don't know what's bad about the Republicans.  (Colorado and Delaware are the only exceptions).  Candidates like Ayotte and Fiorina are going to wither once election season heats up.  Meanwhile, how exactly are you going to drive down numbers on someone like Barbara Boxer?  Everyone knows very well what she stands for, and if they don't already hate her, they never will.

The Crolian Progressive: as great an adventure as ever I heard of...


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox