What Do You Mean You Didn't Fix It While We Were Gone?

by: Natasha Chart

Fri Jul 31, 2009 at 06:00



So the getting married bit is awesome and that was a lovely stretch of holiday. I can't remember the last time I had a real vacation of that scope. By the end, I was so relaxed (tra-la-la) that when I started reading through a couple blogs and checking my political email, it hit me like a ton of bricks (****!)

Many elderly people, such as my homemaker mother (whose years of work were apparently worth nothing to the rest of society) can barely afford their Medicare supplements. Cancer treatment gets decided by insurance companies to the detriment of patients and employers. Sen. Baucus isn't the one who gets the earful about it, because the only people he listens to on healthcare are the Republicans on his committee who have gold-plated care themselves. And while a person might get their hopes up that Baucus will be punished in this lifetime, (via lord_mike) that just isn't going to happen. Not unless Senate Democrats are much firmer noodles than House Democrats.

And it's not just healthcare financing. (more in the extended entry)

Natasha Chart :: What Do You Mean You Didn't Fix It While We Were Gone?
Sens. Lincoln and McCaskill aren't fussed about climate change and that means they're probably going to get to dictate, along with other foot-draggers, the terms of our response towards a threat to all of human civilization, which I've gotten rather fond of, myself. We'll see Sen. Boxer's response to the whining and moaning after recess, which will have to suck in order to get out of committee. The eventual conference bill will also suck, by which I mean it will include enormous bribes to industries that create massive greenhouse emissions and actively lobby to kill meaningful reform.

It would almost be better for them to do nothing than to further take advantage of these policy problems to enrich the already wealthy through worthless rents.

Why does Congress ruin everything it touches? Why do they act, collectively, like such pig-molesting morons? Why do they rarely show more concern for the future than I might expect out of someone who'd been brutalized and apprenticed from tender age to a jaded serial killer? Why do they absolutely refuse to give a single aerial fornication about all the lives they destroy?

I know extremely dedicated, hard-working people who support all the right policies, work the staffer meetings, spur genuinely enthusiastic grassroots calls and set up constituent fly-in days, but can't get Congress to care. They do exactly the things you're supposed to do in order to affect policy and do them well. They also can't get results because they have no money to use as an implicit threat of attack if they don't get what they want.

Laws happen when a corporate lackey who comes into your Congresscritter's office with an offer they can't refuse and walks out with a bill written to their exacting specifications.  By contrast, we can all see them waving their hands helplessly over their inability to do anything that irritates people with money. As a group, Congress only listens to people who can make a lot of trouble for them and have short, unforgiving tempers.

I suspect that a good part of political apathy is the unbearable conflict between believing the lie that we have representative government and knowing that no one's listening. We know there's no punishment for betraying the public interest and under those circumstances, it's a wonder that any officials remain honest.

I admit, there are still a few that give a damn about the rest of us. Because I can't think of anything else right now, it seems worth it to continue petitioning them for redress of our grievances. Even if their colleagues do seem intent on ruining everything they touch in the way of a full-tweak meth addict and such people are as hard to reason with as a Doberman in mid leg hump.

At the very least I can curse them out for being such mercenary sheep-shaggers. And I will.


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Sheep shaggers, now there's an image... (0.00 / 0)
In the Senate, the real problem is the Democratic leadership. With real leadership, everyone would get heard but only the majority viewpoint would be allowed to legislate and that would be based, roughly, on how many people Senators represented. The exact opposite of what we have now. Reid seems to like a conservative Republican Senate. I'd welcome any ideas how we can throw Reid out next year, who could be groomed, how to help make this happen. Clearly Reid has failed as Moses and now in the promised land.

And congrats to both of you on your marriage! Now the fun begins.


The only real power progressives have (4.00 / 1)
...is in the voting booth. Trying to compete in the bribery -- uh, I mean, "contributions" -- sweepstakes with the ultra-wealthy (whose current spending on such things is, to them, relatively chump-change), is absolutely a fool's errand.

But in the voting booth, we have real power -- the only power that politicians and parties care about: the ability to deny them office. Most often most progressives throw this enormous power away, voting for anti-progressive DLCers, Blue Dogs, and their fellow travelers because they have a "D" after their names...falling for the well-funded, corporate-establishment-favored "lesser-evil" scam that guarantees the ever-rightward movement of the DP.


I Sorry Natasha But You're Going To Have To Post A MUCH Better Video! (4.00 / 1)
We can barely see you in the video and your wedding dress is just a white blur!

; ^ )

Congratulations though on your marriage!  


Agreed (0.00 / 0)
I applaud your happiness. Congrats again.

I blog on InnermostParts.org

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox