The Window is Closing

by: Mike Lux

Fri Aug 07, 2009 at 12:15


Arianna Huffington's spot-on post yesterday about our country's broken financial system led with the sentence "The window for reform is closing." Which is word for word what Elizabeth Warren said to me in a conversation we had a few days ago. For all of the incredible power Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase have, their Achilles heel is momentarily exposed because of the incredibly anger the American public justifiably has at them right now, and there is a window for at least some progress on this.

There is, ironically, another reason for urgency as well: as Arianna and I and others have noted in multiple articles in recent weeks, the big Wall St. traders are back to their old tricks, business as usual pure and simple. And those tricks are exactly what brought down our financial system over the last couple of years. With our economy in such fragile shape, their recklessness endangers us greatly. I've heard people say that if we don't fix the problem, we could be in danger of another financial meltdown 10 or 20 years from now, but that way understates the problem. With our economy as weak as it is, we could see another financial crisis next year, not 10 or 20 years from now.

The remarkable thing about all this is that the reforms the White House has proposed are so modest. The Consumer Financial Protection Agency is a commonsense, reasonable proposal that even the Republicans I know from the financial industry think makes perfect sense. For an old lefty populist like myself, I don't think it goes nearly far enough. But even this moderate policy is running into a violent assault by Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, and the American Bankers Association. If something this reasonable is opposed by these guys, it's a sign of how far out on the ledge these companies have gone in pursuit of making billions by unregulated gambling and chicanery.

The window is closing on financial reform, and the window is closing on health care reform. These are easily the biggest political tests of Obama's Presidency, those that will determine whether his Presidency is going to be a success. A President can come back politically from early failures on big issues, as Bill Clinton did, but if they lose the big early battles, they generally don't try to do anything big or ambitious again.

I wrote in my book The Progressive Revolution about how the pattern of American history is that every so often, the window to create big change comes open for a while, that the combination of crisis, leadership, and political movement make it possible to really make big positive changes in our country. That window is open right now, and President Obama, to his credit, is trying to keep it open by doing some big and important things. But if he gives up the fight and caves in to special interest lobbyists, or if Democrats in Congress don't back his play, or if the reform movements on these big issues can't deliver grassroots strength, then the window will slam shut. That would be an immense tragedy, because this country desperately needs some big changes, and because the Republican opposition to Obama is going down such a dark path.

This country has been very lucky for much of its history. But if we can't fight through the special interest muck and deliver big change soon, I fear that our luck could run out. The economic and political storm are gathering in the sky, and we can't afford to do nothing to change the dynamics.

Mike Lux :: The Window is Closing

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Obama will sign (4.00 / 6)
any piece of shit that gets to his desk, to the accompaniment of titanic rhetoric, dancing girls, wild beasts, and lucullan celebratory feasting.

The SCUM will be orgasmic.

But to the extent that the CorpoRats, the Health Insurance parasites, and Big Pharma (e.g.) can "live" with it, that should be a reliable index of just how deep the CorpoRat drones in Congress intend to shove the 'status quo' up our asses.

No bill that is acceptable to the HIPs , et al, is going to be anything more than a cosmetic patch on an endemic problem which no one in Congress or the WhiteHouse really wants to take the heat (from the vested, hugely wealthy, special interests: the Owners, i.e.) for fixing.

But then I have always maintained that it took a special kind of delusion to expect or imagine that any Pol who is acceptable to the Owners would do anything with their "power" that would substantively or meaningfully diminish the power of the people who owned him/her and all their fellows.


Thanks...It causes me no joy (0.00 / 0)
n/t

[ Parent ]
I don't see Obama (4.00 / 9)
fighting special interests right now. Where are you seeing that? He has cut a bad deal with drug companies and is signaling that regional co-ops or some other fake public option might be acceptable.

The climate change bill isn't even close to what's needed to address the real problem, but Obama draws no lines in the sand. If by some miracle Congress passes ACES, Obama will sign and claim victory, even though the bill wouldn't accomplish anything.

Wall Street is obviously getting everything they want from Obama as well.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


I am curious for Mike's impressions.... (4.00 / 6)
....which he may not feel comfortable sharing....My impression is that Pelosi is likely putting her Speakership on the line with her anti-health insurance lobby rhetoric.  I am sure Steny is sharpening the shiv.

Meanwhile Reid and Obama are quietly tolerating at best, or working behind the scenes with at worst, the obvious industry-backed stall that Baucus is putting on the whole process.

Obama it seems to me is in the end going to go with whatever Congress hands to him, at the behest of their corporate paymasters, reasoning that the appearance of success in failure is more important than being seen to have fought and failed for the right thing.  If true, that strikes me as an epic political miscalculation.

One thing though, watching the coverage of the teabagger terrorism at the town hall meetings: You can always count on the Democratic apparatchiks to be befuddled and hapless in the face of organized opposition.

How did a country so vast end up with a political class that is so incompetent, or batshit insane, or both?


They aren't quietly tolerating Baucus (4.00 / 5)
They are loudly encouraging Baucus.

Obama has completely failed on health care so far, and the debate has descended into chaos. There is some time for Obama to change course and seize the opportunity, but because that would require him to do things he has so far been unwilling to do, I am not confident it will occur.


[ Parent ]
When Obama whipped for TARP... (4.00 / 5)
... that ratified the trillions given to the banksters already by the Bush administration, with no accountability and no transparency -- a state of affairs that has been constant across both administrations.

The window closed in October 2008. Progressives who are not Democratic partisans know this.

I am in earnest -- I will not equivocate -- I will not excuse -- I will not retreat a single inch -- AND I WILL BE HEARD.  


They gave them the dessert before the vegetables. (0.00 / 0)
Barack is a dad, right?

Is the window really closing? (0.00 / 0)
I think that Chris makes a pretty good point that it is NAFTA that hurt Clinton so badly.

And Obama probably isn't going to sign something unpopular.  

So most likely I think that the opposition is in the real bind here.   The mere idea of Obama being president is the thing that they hate.  The idea that he could pass successful bipartisan legislation is intolerable to them.

At the same time Republicans are probably going to vote for the final legislation because not getting anything done is intolerable to the other 70% of the population.

So I think the main thing is that Obama gets something good and positive passed.  And then we get further into the situation where the extremists and the moderates on the Republican side dislike each other more.

So I think anything that is a positive development even if it isn't perfect is going to be a pretty big push forward.  One of the problems I think that open left has is that it tends to not be very culturally diverse at all so it misses the bigger picture.


http://transgendermom.blogspot....


Rs vote for? (0.00 / 0)
Since when have anything close to a majority of Rs voted for anything this year?  What counts for them is how much of a public show can be put up about the opposition to a health care bill.  The Tea Baggers are dominating coverage far more than Harry and Louise ever did and Harry and Louise terrified Congress.

Our best hope is that the Tea Baggers will somehow be dismissed as wild eyed crazies who are insane.

It seems like at least half of the big progressive reform moments wind up producing either very little or nothing.  This is one of those moments.  When I saw the Tea Bag astroturfers out in force day after day I got a bad feeling.  The establishment has all the excuse it needs.

Btw, don't count on the insurance companies keeping their word.  They welched on Bill Clinton and they can welch on Obama just as easily.  They are, at best, amoral.


[ Parent ]
The windows closed months ago. (0.00 / 0)
It was ever thus.

The Dem leadership never made any real effort to deliver a winning strategy on both these issues and as such guaranteed "failure" in the eyes of the public. In the eyes of those who will profit in the form of valuable cash and prizes in exchange for this "failure," well I think they probably look at it a bit differently.

In healthcare, pre-compromising down from Single Payer to Robust Public Option for 130 million people, down to PO for 9 million... well, by the time the real fighting starts, any notion of real reform has already been put to rest--we're left to fight over table scraps.

In 2008, Nancy Pelosi took $300+K from the Medical-Industrial Complex, so it seems to me her finger pointing at them being "villains" is just kabuki--I need not point out all the others, as their income streams have been well publicized by now. Obama will be assured many, many millions from the M-I Complex on his next campaign.

All the incentives are for these folks to screw it up and make excuses for it later. He'll need that money, because I think his grassroots fundraising will drop precipitously. But obviously that doesn't matter to them.

Thus it is that in war the victorious strategist
   only seeks battle after the victory has been won,
   whereas he who is destined to defeat first fights
   and afterwards looks for victory. -- Sun Tzu

In other words, the epitaph for reform was written well before the Grand Kabuki (rich in it's corporate sponsored, thuggish astroturfy goodness) even started.


"More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly." -Woody Allen, My Speech to the Graduates


Excellent analysis Mike (4.00 / 1)
I have always told progressive people that winning the election is the easy part for democrats. Governing is the really hard part.

A window for progressive change does not stay open long and our time for this one is running short.


There are two windows (4.00 / 1)
One window you've pointed out, Mike, that we're debating here. It's the window that lets Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan push back on sensible change.

The other window is what's happening with the economy for hundreds of millions of Americans. Wall Street lives in a completely different universe from the little people. Yet the economic fundamentals are so bad that failure of the economy is inevitable. Bucking up the banks and the status quo won't solve the problem when this week it was reported that as many as half of US mortgages will be underwater by 2011. Half.

This second window will not allow Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, GE, or any other giant corporation to dictate change. That window will close when either we are a fascist country (the corporations win) or a representative democracy (people win and bring bad corporations to heel).

Until the fundamental unfairness in the economy is addressed, the window for change will always be open. Sadly, it'll probably be the blood in the streets kind of change because people like Obama don't appear to get it. They're happy to shovel trillions to Wall Street on a moments notice but low millions for foreclosures with no follow up to ensure something gets done. And his program, in any event, is a boondoggle for banks, giving them more fees, more interest, over a longer term. A truly fair foreclosure policy, for example, would amend mortgages with a clause that lets homeowners cram down their mortage in extraordinary circumstances (e.g. 20%+ price decline in 2-3 years) in a structured fashion that shares any future upside with the bank that holds their mortgage.

At some point most people will realize they've been had. They'll lose patience waiting for change. When it's enough people, change will happen. The only way out is to punitively tax the rich, to return their taxes to the status quo of the 1950s-1970s, promote unions and union-level wages for companies that do not unionize, dis-incentivize offshoring jobs, break up the largest banks, change the funding of public campaigns to remove corporate influence, and break up corporate ownership of the media.

Sound impossible? It is. That's why I fear for our country. Nothing less will do. This second window of opportunity is wide open and will be for years, if not decades. People will revolt, at some point, if Obama and the rest only give us the status quo. At some point, with same old same old, these issues will be out of the hands of our political class.


There is no "window." (0.00 / 0)
As long as Parties funded by Wall Street get votes from progressives, labor, the left, environmentalists, antiwar and civil liberties advocates, etc, there will be no substantive progressive change. The DP will continue its 65-year slide to the right.

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox