Remember "Bush Derangement Syndrome"?

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Aug 08, 2009 at 07:30


Charles Krauthammer, December 2003:

    Diane Rehm: ``Why do you think he (Bush) is suppressing that (Sept. 11) report?''

    Howard Dean: ``I don't know. There are many theories about it. The most interesting theory that I've heard so far -- which is nothing more than a theory, it can't be proved -- is that he was warned ahead of time by the Saudis. Now who knows what the real situation is?''

    -- ``Diane Rehm Show,'' NPR, Dec. 1

It has been 25 years since I discovered a psychiatric syndrome (for the record: ``Secondary Mania,'' Archives of General Psychiatry, November 1978), and in the interim I haven't been looking for new ones. But it's time to don the white coat again. A plague is abroad in the land.

Bush Derangement Syndrome: the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency -- nay -- the very existence of George W. Bush.

How quaint!  A passing comment made by a prominent politician becomes the hook for Krauthammer to hang his novel diagnosis on.  And the rest of his column?  His densely-packed demonstration of pervasive delusion?

Aside from feeble pokes at Cynthia McKinney and Barbara Streisand, there really wasn't much of anything aside from this:

It is true that BDS has struck some pretty smart guys -- Bill Moyers ranting about a ``right-wing wrecking crew'' engaged in ``a deliberate, intentional destruction of the United States way of governing'' and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, whose recent book attacks the president so virulently that Krugman's British publisher saw fit to adorn the cover with images of Dick Cheney in a Hitler-like mustache and Bush stitched-up like Frankenstein. Nonetheless, some observers took that to be satire; others wrote off Moyers and Krugman as simple aberrations, the victims of too many years of neurologically hazardous punditry.

Well, Moyers was right, naturally.  Taking us to war without a formal declaration, after promising to get UN approval, and then not doing so, thus making the war both unconstitutional and illegal under international law, and doing all of that based on phony intelligence?  That more than qualifies as proof of what Moyers said.  And Krugman?  Krugman is deranged because his British publisher wanted to sex up his cover art?  Couldn't Krauthammer come up with even one deranged statement by Krugman?

Well, no of course he couldn't.  Krugman was not then, and never has been deranged.  But what to say now about Krauthammer's conservative brethren?  We're not talking passing comments, or foreign book covers here.  

We're talking 28% of Republicans so deluded that they think Obama wasn't born in Hawaii, 30% who aren't sure, and an entire GOP congressional delegation that does not dare to simply say that this is just plain foolish.  (Not to mention the 17% of Republicans so deluded that they still think Obama is a Muslim.)  They pushed a wave of "tea parties" to protest tax increases that didn't exist, and now they're forming mobs, and making not-so-veiled threats, just short of rioting over dire threats in Obama's health care plan that also don't exist.

So, first we had "Bush Derangement Syndrome"--a syndrome curiously lacking in definable symptoms.  And now with Obama we have symptoms of derangement out that wazoo.  But thank God it's not a syndrome, or else then we'd be in real trouble!

Paul Rosenberg :: Remember "Bush Derangement Syndrome"?

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
What we're experiencing is extreme polarization (4.00 / 3)
At some point, something's got to give. The thing that made me uncomfortable with Obama during the primaries was his rhetoric about reaching out to the other side and putting partisanship behind us. The reason being that he seemed to be fairly naive about what he was up against, indeed, what all Democrats and reasonable moderates are up against in the current political climate.

If somewhere between a quarter and a third of adult Americans are under the sway of this highly irrational, angry, racist, right-wing movement, it is no laughing matter.

How can we get from here to a point where reasonable, measured debate is possible? Not to mention moderately progressive change?

I am under no illusion that it would have been different if Hillary Clinton had won the primary battle and the general election. In fact, I'm surprised at how quickly forces similar to the crazed anti-Clintonites of the 1990s have gathered.

I am wondering, was it the Gates comment? The Sotomayor nomination and hearings (all that "wise Latina" language, repeated ad nauseum by GOP senators, even Graham who eventually voted in favor)? Health reform?

All I can say is, thank the lord for "Cash for Clunkers" and a dip in the most recent unemployment rate. That is shoring up Obama's approval with a certain sector of the less political middle.


I Don't Think It Was Any One Thing (4.00 / 1)
It was just the rightwing hegemony machine, with their army of demonizer bunnies that keep going, and going, and going.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
Tomorrow (4.00 / 2)
I'm going to a health care forum sponsored by a local Democratic club. I'm supposed to be doing the video for them. Tell me, Dear Abby, should I bring a camcorder or a baseball bat?

Shades of the Thirties, and what lay down that road. Of course the last thing these folks know anything about is history.


[ Parent ]
Leave the baseball bat at home!! (0.00 / 0)
Always leave the baseball bat at home!

By any means necessary should point to millions of solutions, only one of which is violence. I am sorry to be asking everyone to let the bastards hurt you without recourse to hurting them back but that is thrust of history and the truth of America. If America is anything it is its modern Saint Martin Luther King Jr. If we honour that man, if we honor our constitution if we honor democracy we will NOT fall prey to neanderthal thinking of the right in policy in tactics in respect in any way at all.

If you bring one thing to the meeting please let it be a song of freedom songs, let it be cake and flowers, let it the solid knowledge of who we are what history we carry into battle for peace and justice and freedom and rights and healthcare.

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
Sigh.... (4.00 / 2)
Irony may not be dead, but clearly I'm not as good at it as I thought I was. No worries, mate. I'm not the baseball bat type.

[ Parent ]
Irony's Not Dead (4.00 / 2)
but a whole lot of folks are suffering from irony deficiency.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
Sir, I have great respect, and dont think I was yelling at you. (0.00 / 0)
I think we need to begin saying these things out loud and make the lessons of our history clear.

These are dangerous times, if only to make clear so that no one reads your humour as personal confusion, I felt it was necessary to make clear our choices.

I meant no disrespect, nor was I even worried about your personal predilection for violence, but constant repetition of the lessons we have learned will be necessary as we go forward.

There are many that thrill at "unions" 'backing up' the meetings with the strength shown in attendance.

Unions should be there, must be there, must be there, but always and completely, it is the teaching of King and the founders that have to guide us all forward.  

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
A modest disagreement (4.00 / 1)
I would say not always, and not completely. The defense of civilization is sometimes a good deal more complicated than you make it out to be. The British Raj was hardly squeamish about violence, but it was capable of shame. So, as it turned out, was the white America of the post-war years. On the other hand, we do have examples, in what happened in both Germany and Russia, of a shameless savagery which would simply have sent Gandhi to Sobibor, or to a Siberian labor camp, without so much as a by-your-leave, and very early on at that, before he had a chance to build a reputation as a saint/martyr.

We also have a lot of evidence now about how such evil gets started, why it prospers, and what it takes to defeat it. Looking carefully at that evidence does not leave a reasonable person as sanguine about the inevitable triumph of non-violence as you appear to be.

As with all things political, judgments must be made in medias res, when outcomes are not so clear, and people's lives and the future of liberal institutions are in real jeopardy. If they come for you, will you go peacably? I don't think you can know that in advance.


[ Parent ]
When they come for my childen and yours I am willing to offer to my life. (0.00 / 0)
I have faith not in the reasonableness of the crazy crazy base, nor in the automatons that been placed in positions of power for the right.

But I have faith in the American people. Not that it isnt frightening and bizarre, but we will avoid the madness that swept Germany into hell.  

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
Camcorder please! (4.00 / 3)
Your fighting spirit is commendable, but we need your ass in one piece, and not in jail.

Besides, the damage that can be inflicted with a well-placed camcorder is deeper and more enduring. Just ask ex-Senator Macaca.

Montani semper liberi


[ Parent ]
I think it is frightening but not (4.00 / 2)
surprising.  I wanted to be wrong.  I think this has been building since the election of Ronald Reagan.  I had hoped it had peaked with Newt and friends and their insane hatred of Bill Clinton, long before there was a Monica.   But in my heart I knew it had not.  I knew at some level that no matter if it were Hillary, John Edwards or Barack we would have a boatload of craziness.  

I did not think that Obama's desire to reach out would end it, no matter how reasonable or pragmatic he was.  It did not work for the Clintons either.  I did not think Hillary would be fooled again into think compromise with extreme crazies funded by extreme greed mongers would work but I still wanted her.  Admittedly I was always torn wishing this job on anyone.

In the beginning, I had been hopeful that Obama's calm and cool would defuse the crazies.  But they are too easily manipulated and the oligarchs are greedier than ever.  

What scares me is that I know people that are buying into this crap...people I thought would be able to see through it.  
I don't know what to think now. I know people who watch FOX and now when I look at them, I am stunned at my own feelings of disappointment that they continue to watch.  How can they not get it?  And if they, well educated, not crazies, are willing to be blinded by it, then it is clear that some of the less informed, more racist, sexist type are easy to manipulate.


[ Parent ]
But here is what I don't get .. (0.00 / 0)
At some point, something's got to give. The thing that made me uncomfortable with Obama during the primaries was his rhetoric about reaching out to the other side and putting partisanship behind us. The reason being that he seemed to be fairly naive about what he was up against, indeed, what all Democrats and reasonable moderates are up against in the current political climate.

... name me one politican on the national stage that knew this was coming? .. cause lets face it .. most of them should have known .. especially if they held any kind of elective office during the Clinton years .. Democratic officials(bizarrely to me) seemed shocked by what the Republicans and their followers are doing ... when they shouldn't be ... I'd ask Mike why the political strategists on the Democratic side seem to ignore all that is going on .. are they really that clueless? .. or have the Carville's and Donna Brazille's been bought off?


[ Parent ]
Or foreseen, and feared and planned for. (0.00 / 0)
And reaching out to moderates was an obvious way to forestall the perceived violent, crazy, irrational civil disruption that might come from the steps toward reform. To maintain the moderation and rule of law that will preserve the Union.

Reform yes, bi-partisanship with moderate voters, not the crazy leaders of their party, yes. Protection of the constitution yes.

Later in the book, Robert Jordan explains the threat of Fascism in his own country. "Robert Jordan, wiping out the stew bowl with bread, explained how the income tax and inheritance tax worked. 'But the big estates remain. Also, there are taxes on the land,' he said. 'But surely the big proprietors and the rich will make a revolution against such taxes. Such taxes appear to me to be revolutionary. They will revolt against the government when they see that they are threatened, exactly as the fascists have done here,' Primitivo said. 'It is possible.' 'Then you will have to fight in your country as we fight here.' 'Yes, we will have to fight.' 'But are there not many fascists in your country?' 'There are many who do not know they are fascists but will find it out when the time comes.'"

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt00...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
But what moerates are there .. (4.00 / 1)
in the Republican party? ... The Maine twins? .. Ben Nelson?  the Arkansas twins? ... every single Republican that spoke out against Boss Limbaugh has since walked it back ... why? .. who is going to go all Joseph Welch on the Republicans?  And what is the point of compromise .. to water down any Democratic initiatives?  Why must Democrats always .. and I mean always .. be the ones to compromise?

[ Parent ]
bi-partisanship with moderate voters, not the crazy leaders of their party (0.00 / 0)
I am only talking about voters.

A separation of all moderates who are principled Americans who vote and offer their lives to protect voting.

I am talking about Powell an his admirers, I am talkiong about the people who see as clearly as Susan Eisenhower, Eisenhower's granddaughter who left the republican party in disgust. I am talking about the moderate republicans who fill the ranks of Obama's newly risen support (Gallup's recent combined rise in Obama's positives of 14-16% in the last week)

Those are republican voters! Those are the people we will need to protect the constitution if we slip further in the direction we are going.

Obama didnt win 58-60% of the vote.

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
There Are Still Moderate Republican Voters (4.00 / 3)
And moderate-seeming politicians.

The thing is, the hard-core right has never been more than half the GOP base.  Going back as far as you like in public opinion research, it's always been the case that roughly half of the conservative base supports New Deal spending priorities.  Call them confused, or call them nuanced, whatever. But the coherently anti-liberal core of the GOP is a minority within it, even now.  They have just gotten very, very good at confusing the rest and whipping them up into a state of hysteria.

So we need to do things to knock the hard core off its game, and shock the rest of the GOP into rejecting them.  The more extreme the hard core becomes, the more power there is in such a counter-move.

The split is so deep that of course Republcan officeholders don't want to offend the crazies. But neither do many of them outside the South want to get too close, for fear of scaring off the more moderate voters they need in order to get re-elected.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
And another four Sir. (0.00 / 0)


--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
And be clear, I want a health bill that clears congress at 50% +1 in each chamber. (0.00 / 0)
They have "as a Party" lost any right to accommodation on this bill. They have bloodied Obama's hand in every outreach, they have shown in meetings they desire no dialogue but only disruption.

But Obama's reaching out is real, and seen and respected, even as it angers us.

This strengthens him, and does not weaken us. The shape and design of the bill is designed in congress, and the wishes of 50% +1 will determine its form. That is where we must place our crow bars and push. Positive public policy is self reinforcing. Winning is step by step.

We are not where wish to be, we are not where we are going and we are not where we were. We are here.  

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
The Cluelessness Is Truly Breathtaking (4.00 / 3)
Can it really be that only the blogosphere saw this coming?

Can Versailles really be totally and utterly blind to the obvious?

In a word: Yes.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Perhaps not Bush, (0.00 / 0)
(he never knew anything... by design) but the MIC did know about 9/11 before hand.

The higher echelons of society have no use for the advances of 1789.


I dunno, Paul (4.00 / 1)
I don't see how this ends.  We have a bunch of folks who are drunk on their own ignorance and outrage.  And, they seem to be enjoying it.  We've a barkeep who keeps setting 'em up with no end to the happy hour in sight.  No cop parked around the corner to offer a breathalyzer to the patrons as they exit.  Where are the constraints on this system?

If it is genuinely delusional, we got a huge problem because, to my knowledge, there is no cure for that.  Cognitive therapy can do some, medications can do some, but the individual pretty much has to manage their own symptoms/impulses.

What I hope this could be is a profound ignorance of some fed by the malevolence of others.  Someone, from within their own ranks, has to break form and begin to steer this thing by peeling off some less 'deluded.'  Obama cannot do that, and I don't know why he would imagine he could.  But, looking across the landscape, I see no such person on the horizon.

I fear an event that scares the crap out of all of us.  Such an event might bring a few of these folks to their senses, but it may also leave a pile of wounded.


Remember Timothy McVeigh? (4.00 / 3)
We've been through this before.

The Right ratcheted up the hate when Clinton was president, and ratcheted it up until McVeigh finally snapped and did what all his heroes said they wanted.

And when he did, two things happened -- his heroes distanced themselves from him, cut him off and left him on his own, and the mass of the rightwing followers, the somewhat normal people who were angry but not bombthrowers themselves, were horrified. It set the movement back for years.

I think they will do the same thing again, but they seem to be on an accelerated schedule this time.

Montani semper liberi


[ Parent ]
We must remember our American Saints as we go forward. (0.00 / 0)
This is the testing of America. This a time for Martin Luther King Jr.

Another writer here asked about going to a townhall meeting, and should he carry a baseball bat or a camcorder.


Always leave the baseball bat at home!

By any means necessary should point to millions of solutions, only one of which is violence. I am sorry to be asking everyone to let the bastards hurt you without recourse to hurting them back but that is thrust of history and the truth of America. If America is anything it is its modern Saint Martin Luther King Jr. If we honour that man, if we honor our constitution if we honor democracy we will NOT fall prey to neanderthal thinking of the right in policy in tactics, in respect, in policy or thuggery, not in any way at all.

If you bring one thing to the meeting please let it be a songbook of freedom songs, let it be cake and flowers, let it be the solid knowledge of who we are what history we carry into battle for peace and justice and freedom and rights and healthcare.



--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox