Projection Marches On!

by: Paul Rosenberg

Sat Aug 08, 2009 at 13:30


Ah, for the good old days when angry white supremacist guys attacked our black President and Latina Supreme Court nominee as racists.  That the week before last.  This last week its fascist thugs hurling accusations of fascism.

I'm nostalgic for the good old days simply because the new ones have brought us to the brink of mass violence.  There have already been some blows, and a hyping of threats (from TPM):

Based on the news that health care events are edging into violence, an anti-health care reform protester in New Mexico named Scott Oskay is calling on his hundreds of online followers to bring firearms to town halls, and to 'badly hurt' SEIU and ACORN counter protesters.


Popularized in part by conservative blogger Michelle Malkin, the hashtag symbol he's using, #iamthemob, has gone viral on twitter, appearing several times a minute according to a recent search.

Anti-reform activists have scheduled a protest outside SEIU Missouri offices tomorrow, and officials there are taking these threats seriously.

On the other hand, there's an upside to this sharply increased threat level, which is two-fold: First, it has the potential to lead to lead to a sharp rejection of what the movement conservatives are up to.  Second, it's a whole lot easier to document the projection involved.  That's because the dynamic of wealthy special interests supporting street thuggery against "the left" is exactly how both Mussolini and Hitler came to power.

David Neiwert, from Crooks And Liars:

Paul Rosenberg :: Projection Marches On!
No one has a problem with right-wingers marching in protest of the health-care plans. That's certainly their right. And no one minds that they choose to participate in these forums. But town halls were never designed to be vehicles for protest. They have always been about enabling real democratic discourse in a civil setting.

When someone's entire purpose in coming out to a town-hall forum is to chant and shout and protest and disrupt, they aren't just expressing their opinions -- they are actively shutting down democracy.

And that, folks, is a classically fascist thing to do.

The corporate role in orchestrating this thuggery is not just an allegation, or an observation.  It's been confirmed by the perpetrators themselves, as Greg Sargent reports:

Anti-Reform Group Takes Credit For Helping Gin Up Town Hall Rallies

Conservatives for Patients' Rights, the operation that's running a national campaign against a public health care option, is now publicly taking credit for helping gin up the sometimes-rowdy outbursts targeting House Dems at town hall meetings around the country, raising questions about their spontaneity.

CPR is the group headed by controversial former hospitals exec Rick Scott that's spending millions on ads attacking reform in all sorts of lurid ways, a campaign that's being handled by the same P.R. mavens behind the Swift Boat Vets.

In response to my questions, a spokesman for the group confirmed that it has undertaken a concerted effort to get people out to the town hall meetings to protest reform. The spokesperson, Brian Burgess, confirmed that CPR is emailing out "town hall alert" flyers, and schedules of town hall meetings, to its mailing list.

These efforts - combined with CPR's effort to enlist Tea Party-ers, as reported yesterday by TPM - provide a glimpse into the ways anti-reform groups are trying to create a sense of public momentum in their favor.

CPR spokesman Burgess  confirmed that the group had set up a list serv designed to reach out to "third party groups" involved in the health care fight, including the Tea Party activists. And in a statement emailed to me, Scott, who was ousted as a health-care exec amid a 1990s fraud probe, took credit for the town hall showings.

"We have invested a lot of time, energy and resources into educating Americans over the past several months about the dangers of government-run health care and I think we're seeing some of the fruits of that campaign," Scott said, though he claimed outrage was spontaneous.

Similarly, America's Health Insurance Plans, or AHIP, the insurance industry group, has stationed employees in 30 states to track local town hall events.

And, in a scathing article posted just yesterday, Frank Schaeffer, an apostate co-founder of the religious right, writes:

The Republican Old Guard are in the fix an atheist would be in if Jesus showed up and raised his mother from the dead: Their world view has just been shattered. Obama's election has driven them over the edge. Consider Former Congressman Dick Armey. Several far right foundations and the multitrillion dollar health-insurance industry have teamed up with him  to organize the far right foot soldiers of the Republican Party to  intimidate people speaking on behalf of health-care reform.  They are using my old shock troops -- given many of these folks were first energized by the Evangelical pro-life movement that my late father and I started in the 1970s. What we did to clinics they are now doing to congressmen and others speaking out for health care reform.

Having failed at the ballot box, having watched their Fox News-organized "tea parties" fizzle the intimidation tactics which the Republicans have embraced are being used in a well-financed, top-down orchestrated fake grass roots campaign by corporate interests to try and protect  the profits of the insurance business. Armey's FreedomWorks is  organizing against health care reform. Armey's lobbying firm represents pharmaceutical companies including Bristol-Myers Squibb. Armey's lobbying firm also represents the trade group for the life insurance industry.  FreedomWorks is supporting the status quo at all costs. ....

I used to know Dick Armey quite well....Armey was once a decent guy, whatever his political views. How could he stoop so low as to be organizing what amounts to America's Brown Shirts today?

I think I know what happened to him, Gingrich and the rest: They can't compute that their white man-led conservative revolution is dead. They can't reconcile their idea of themselves with the fact that white men like them don't run the country any more -- and never will again. To them the black president is leading a column of the "other" into their promised land. Gays, immigrants, blacks, progressives, even a female Hispanic appointed to the Supreme Court... for them this is the Apocalypse.

The last presidential election (to paraphrase Bart Simpson)  "broke their brains." What else could explain their embrace of intimidation -- rather than discourse -- over the health care debate and such unsavory moments of madness as the Republicans accusing Obama and Judge Sonia Sotomayor of racism, knowing full well that they'd just destroyed their chances with the Hispanic community forever?  

The "Scorched Earth Policy"

Dick Army and company have been driven mad by their reversal, not just of political fortunes but of seeing that they've wasted their lives. They now know they were wrong: about the country, the free market, war for fun and profit, and what the American people really want. They made their best case and were rejected by the American people --  and by history. Bush was their man and he turned out to be a fool. So now all the the Republican gurus have left is what the defeated Germans of World War Two had: a scorched earth policy. If they can't win then everyone must go down. Obama must fail! The country must fail!
....

There is no daylight between the Republican Party, the health-care insurance industry, far right leaders like Dick Armey, the legion of insurance lobbyists, and now, a small army of  thugs. All we're missing is actual uniforms, otherwise we now have a full blown American version of the Nazi Brown Shirts.

No, I don't believe that these people are about to take over the country. No, the sky is not falling. But the Republican Party is. It is now profoundly anti-American....

Conclusion: the Fascist Formula

Here's the emerging American version of the fascist's formula: combine millions of dollars of lobbyists' money with embittered  troublemakers  who have a small army of not terribly bright white angry people (collected over decades through pro-life mass mailing networks) at their beck and call, ever ready to believe any myth or lie circulated by the semi literate and completely and routinely misinformed right wing -- Evangelical religious underground. Then put his little mob together with the insurance companies' big bucks. That's how it works -- American Brown Shirts at the ready....  

As Schaeffer's article makes eminently clear, there are multiple parallels between what's behind the town hall thuggery and the classical manifestations of fascism/Nazism.  But to make the point about projection blindingly clear, consider these final two points:

(1) Nazism was fundamentally founded on projection:  It aimed to take over the world, and did so based on the claim that this is what the Jews had already done.  It practiced mass-extermination, based on fantasies about what Jews had done and were planning to do that had absolutely no basis in fact.

(2) When the new brownshirts today--and those who egg them on--claim that the rest of us are fascists, what they are doing is practicing the "big lie", which is, of course, pure Hitler.

What Is To Be Done?

America is in a very perilous place right now.  The parallels to Germany and Nazism are bone-chillingly real.  American conservatism has crashed and burned, just as German conservatism had done by the end of WWI.  The question now is if we will see another two decades of rightwing rage tearing our country apart, and threatening the safety, perhaps even the survival of the rest of the world.

While there are many different things that can and should be done to counter what is happening--I am a great believer in pluralism, and a diversity of forms of activism--I believe that one of the most crucial, and most powerful things that can be done is to call on official leaders of the Republican Party to renounce the violence and the anti-democratic tactics that are being empoloyed to shut down debate at town halls across the country.

This is the bottom line:  Stiffling debate is anti-democratic.  It is un-American.  Are Republican officeholders going to defend mass un-American activity?  Or are they going to denounce it?  Are they pro-American?  Or anti-American?

It's really just that simple.

And they should be willing to take a stand.  For America.  Or against it.

The choice is theirs.  But it's up to us to put it to them, and demand an answer.


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
If violence breaks out, (4.00 / 4)
watch for the press to take an "evenhanded" take on it, balancing 20 violent anti-health care protesters against one union member or Democrat who fought back against them.

I hope that Congress members are getting the police out in force for these things.  


Already happening, but it ain't "evenhanded" (4.00 / 2)
Every single report I have seen on this topic in the M$M has made a connection between these jack-boots and the anti-war protests by Code Pink. They are using these assholes to paint protests from the "left" as disruptive and violent. Complete distortion. The irony (if that's the correct word) is that absolutely none of these so-called "reporters" ever even bothered to mention anti-war protests when they were actually happening. These. miscreants? They get coverage.

Makes Orwell and Kafka seem a bit quaint.


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
Well, You See (4.00 / 3)
The fact that they never covered Code Pink in the first place is an essential element in making this whole false equivalency work.

First, it works for the media perpetrators, since they don't know any better.  Second, it works for their audiences for exactly the same reason.

"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"


[ Parent ]
I think the "media perpetrators" know damned well (4.00 / 1)
what they are doing. Maybe not all of them, but enough of them.


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
Mistaken Identity (0.00 / 0)
I'm talking talking heads.

They're generally clueless.

You're talking Murdoch, Ailes, etc.

"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"


[ Parent ]
Ah yes, (4.00 / 2)
I remember when Code Pink was calling for assassinations and emptying out all the gun stores ...

wait a minute, that never happened.

Montani semper liberi


[ Parent ]
Well, They Gave Out Symbolic Pink Slips (4.00 / 2)
Symbolically firing people. Threatening to fire guns.

It's all the same, right?

"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"


[ Parent ]
Also (4.00 / 1)
I heard one of them one time dropped the F bomb when talking about the Bush administration.

That is totally the same as using a real bomb to shut down a clinic. So I guess the gasbags are right, and both sides are equal.

Montani semper liberi


[ Parent ]
Two Decades... (4.00 / 2)
..and many of these fuckers are dead. Not because of any violent acts, but because they're old. Just sayin'.

Consider:

One of the central ironies of these events has been Medicare recipients protesting government-run health insurance.

While this movement isn't completely geriatric, it is almost entirely non-young. There's no new "Reagan Youth" out there, and it would take an ideological shift of titanic proportions to bring the current 18 to 30 year old generation around to the right-wing side of things.

Which isn't to say things couldn't get violent, but I really don't think these people are on a path to real power.

If there's a total global economic collapse and/or ecological breakdown all bets are off of course. No one can predict the Red Dawn.

However, absent extreme external motivating factors, I think an actual facist outcome is highly unlikely.  

Me | My Work | Future Majority


That's where "Family Values" comes into the picture (4.00 / 3)
preserve the hatred in the next generation.


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
This makes me wonder... (4.00 / 1)
What were young Germans' attitudes about Nazism as it was ascendant? Were they disproportionately supportive? Most violence is perpetrated by young men, especially those 15-25 years old. A fascist movement would have a lot more violent potential if that is the cohort it is most effectively motivating.

[ Parent ]
It was a youth movement (4.00 / 1)
Polling was in its infancy then, so I don't know if there is any useful data, but any movement that requires thugs going around and being violent is going to have to effectively and aggressively recruit young men.  


[ Parent ]
The 18 to 30 year old generation might not be (4.00 / 5)
able to be shifted around to a paleoconservative or Bush-style type of conservatism, but they sure as hell might fall for a Ron Paul-style type of conservatism.  

Most young people are voting Democratic due to cultural issues like gay rights and the like.  There really isn't much care given to tax and spending policy.  At least that's what my contact with Gen Y-ers seems to indicate.


[ Parent ]
Is the FBI investigating Mr. Scott Oskay? (4.00 / 3)
If not, why? Do you think they would be as blase if his name were Mohammed and these messages were coming from a mosque?

"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


If not, why NOT (0.00 / 0)
is what I meant.

"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
Sunlight is the best disinfectant (4.00 / 1)
for too many years, pseudo-intellectuals have been preening on about "Godwin's Law" and other such claptrap.

At least now we can acknowledge that not only It Can Happen Here, but that fascism is deeply ingrained in our military and police.


People have been idiots in falsely applying such things (4.00 / 1)
But demanding that people actually discuss fascism in context, and actually talk about something of substance when invoking the name of fascism is entirely reasonable.  

To call any conservative a fascist is to render the term meaningless, and to dilute it when you actually have black shirt-style thugs actually disrupting democracy.  


[ Parent ]
These people aren't conservatives (0.00 / 0)
which kind of feeds into your Confucian "Rectification of Names" point.

A conservative would look at the last 80 years of American socialism and say:

We went from a secondary power to the world's only superpower, split the atom, built AI, sequenced the human genome, and put men on the moon. Not only was socialism not a "Road to Serfdom", people are more free now than ever. Thus we should defend the socialist status quo. -- I.e. most Democrats.

Those called conservatives and the "movement" to which they belong are a triad of Dixie racists, evangelical nut cases, and Will-to-Power types.

It was always sad to see genuine conservatives and libertarians get caught up with them; and if we are to establish a proper defense of the republic, we will be better served by marshaling with the conservatives and libertarians.


[ Parent ]
The Incredible Fuzziness Of Being "Conservative" (0.00 / 0)
The problem, of course, is that conservatism is riddled with contradictions, sending it off every which way but loose.

However, along these same lines, I've argued before that Liberalism is the "True Conservatism".


"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"


[ Parent ]
It would be nice to think (4.00 / 2)
That Dick Cheney's diagnosis applies here, and we're seeing the death throes of movement conservativism.

Nothing more dangerous than a cornered animal.


Only If You Try To Go After It Directly (4.00 / 3)
Being cornered, its ability to do harm is already limited.  The key is to take advantage of the situation, which requires recognizing what it is.

"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"

[ Parent ]
How hard would it be for a clandestine MIC group to detonate a bomb in DC (4.00 / 1)
while Congress was convened, leaving only the military around to govern a frightened and radicalized populace?

A nation of Daniel De Groots wouldn't turn to fascism. But we don't have a nation of Daniel De Groots.


[ Parent ]
Strange (4.00 / 1)
I see it exactly the opposite. Bush/Cheney was a victory for the NeoCons. Oh sure, maybe not in the electoral sense, but dictators (and dictator-wannbees) don't really care about elections, do they?

The NeoCons are kicking our ass. The application of strong arm tactics in a wide-spread, in your face, you can't touch us manner such as they are now employing on the Town Hall front is driven more from victorious hubris than any death throes.


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
Fascists & Traitors (4.00 / 1)
This more recent development of smearing of unions reminds me of the 14 Characteristics of Fascism; one being, "labor power is suppressed."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

I find it very disturbing that I'm now hearing people equate SEIU appearances to those of FreedomWorks people - clearly NOT the same.

As to whether or not the Republicans are going to support this anti-Americans activity of shutting down public debate with our representatives... Thom Hartmann was suggesting listeners to call the RNC and let them know they should be ashamed of this behavior. Many called in to say they did exactly that, and that was when I had first heard of the redirection of complaints to the DNC. Anyway, one caller said he had called the RNC to let them know he was going to participate in these Town Hall disruptions, and asked if he had the RNC's blessing - AND THEY GAVE IT!!!! I think this is actually a brilliant tactic; and this may be the perfect way go about getting them on the record as supporters of this incredibly anti-American activity!

What do you think?

We the People...participating in our democracy again!


This post is spot on (4.00 / 3)
But to answer the question:

Are Republican officeholders going to defend mass un-American activity?

Yes. Most definitely. Back in the late '90s, they managed to mainstream the militia movement into their fold. Throughout the Shrub Years, they routinely defended and instigated un-American activity. Their entire media complex has been actively fomenting violence all that time--all while the "mainstream" media mainstreams the noxious mutterings of the far right. Now a plethora of corporations are getting into the act, not even bothering to hide their overt connection to a rising tide of political violence.

So not only does the Right (and I'm including RWA Dems as well, since they also stand to benefit from crushing liberal dissent) get to beat up on DFHs, they get to turn a tidy profit as well! For them, it rather seems there's no down side to this.

Lastly, since what we're seeing is a highly coordinated interstate effort to foment mass political violence, this strikes me as a Federal Law Enforcement issue.

Perhaps we should also demand the DOJ start acting in the public safety and start investigating these people? Perhaps a few stiff prison sentences might help.

"In our country, the lie has become not just a moral category but a pillar of the State" -- Alexander Solzhenitsyn


Donate to Open Left










Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search