Why a Whole Foods Boycott Might Actually Work to Spur Real Health Care Reform

by: tremayne

Thu Aug 13, 2009 at 00:26


Update: This plan is beginning to spread on Twitter. Help it along if you can.

The CEO and co-founder of Whole Foods has written a WSJ editorial attacking the still-in-the-works Obama health care plan in favor of less regulation on the insurance industry and downsizing Medicare. Here's one blogger's take:

Not very smart for a company that depends almost entirely on wealthy Democrats who are willing to pay five dollars for a six ounce carrot soda. Come on, you can do it, boycott them for at least a week and discover how much money you can save at Trader Joe's.

Actually, I think this is a great idea. A stupendous idea. Here's why:

1) Pretty much the only way to get the attention of corporate fat cats and the Senators and House members they own is to hit them in the pocket book. Remember when Sinclair Broadcasting was planning to air the anti-John Kerry "documentary" in 2004? The "sell Sinclair stock" meme was born and spread through the tubes and the stock started going down. Soon, plans for airing the documentary "changed." If a boycott of Whole Foods plan spreads, even if it is targeted for, say, the rest of August, they will notice. Similarly, a sell Whole Foods stock (WFMI) might also be effective.

2. My impression is that the customers of Whole Foods are left-leaning. If true, a boycott by even a quarter of Democratic customers would have a major impact.

3. While Whole Foods used to be a regional operation, it has now spread to 39 states. There are 3 locations in DC, 8 in Maryland and many more in Virginia. Congress members know of it and probably shop there.

4. If such a plan works, if the stock falls for example, the press will pick up on it and it will spread.

5. If the plan works it will be another example to corporate America that people want change. You would think nearly 70 million votes for Obama would have sent that message but I guess that's yesterday's news. We need to send a reminder and this could be a really good one.

6. It's a good opportunity to seek out local alternative sources for the stuff you might normally buy at Whole Foods. Farmers markets, etc. If you go to Whole Foods and stock up on essentials in anticipation of the boycott, it's not really going to hurt them is it?

There are downsides. For example, the people who work at Whole Foods could be negatively affected. That may argue for a time-specific boycott, or, alternatively, a stock-selling plan.

What do you think? Put your ideas in the comments. And if you have better Facebooking skills than mine or other viral messaging abilities, get to work.

tremayne :: Why a Whole Foods Boycott Might Actually Work to Spur Real Health Care Reform

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Sounds like a good idea to me (4.00 / 8)
Boycott Whole Foods until health care passes or he publicly backs real reform.  

I know this will shock some people .. (4.00 / 5)
but the CEO of Whole Foods .. he's a wacko McMegan(aka Megan McArdle) Ayn Rand lovin' Libertarian(if the op-ed didn't just prove it to you)  .. so I'd be all for a boycott .. if I shopped there .. but there isn't a Whole Foods in this part of the Philly suburbs

Besides that.. (4.00 / 8)
Whole Foods deserves it. They've become just another big corporation that comes to town and tries to put good local competitors out of business, using the usual corporate "take no prisoners" tactics

I have watched the behemouth eat alocal organic and healthy food store. (4.00 / 1)
An by eat I mean drive them under.

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
I would suggest the following (4.00 / 7)
to ensure they understand we mean it.  

(1) Write or email your intention to not shop there until such time the CEO rethinks his position.

(2) Let them know you will provide proof of alternate store shopping.

(3) Send them copies of receipts.

A threat is one thing but actual dollar figure proof is going to leave a mark.  


no Whole Foods in Iowa (4.00 / 3)
but if there were I would definitely boycott it and I would make my intentions known to the manager of our local store (not just to company HQ).

State and local bloggers should start working on this immediately where Whole Foods has a presence.

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


Here is a list of the stores all across the US (4.00 / 1)
Find the one nearest you, buy a soda, write a letter the receipt and and some receipts of new stores that you shop at for the boycott.

http://www.wholefoodsmarket.co...

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
I live in Oakland and... (4.00 / 4)
I'm surrounded by Whole Foods markets. Went to one today, in fact.

I would be happy (happy!) to join an organized boycott. In a minute. Till responsible single-payer or public-option healthcare passes. Till Mackey pees on a copy of "Atlas Shrugged."

(I say keep the bar to participation low. [I'm a WF shopper, after all.] If the boycott is effective, the $ will show up in their balance sheet. If it's not effective, receipts from other stores won't help.)


I also enocourage picketing... (4.00 / 6)
We could probably get a lot of support from the grocers unions, since Whole Foods is anti-union...

This kind of picket could be very effective, since I would suspect that most Whole Foods Shoppers are pro-reform...  the picket should focus on Whole Foods attempts to stymie health acre reform, and less so on union issues... one thing at a time...

Anyone got contacts with any of these unions?

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


This sounds like... (4.00 / 5)
...a job for local labor councils.  I'm going to suggest it as a delegate to my own labor council at the next meeting.

[ Parent ]
Definitely A Good Idea (3.33 / 6)
Picketing & handing out leaflets about the boycott.  Include local shopping alternatives on the leaflet.  Sweet!

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
United Farmworkers (4.00 / 3)
Yes, it was a long time ago but a similar boycott of lettuce basically established the United Farmworkers.  This can work.

[ Parent ]
I would be in favor of leafletting regardless (4.00 / 4)
of whether there is a boycott or not. Hit every person who goes into the store with some hardcore, fact based, succinctly written (and well sourced) information. It's really, really going to hurt the WF "brand" the more people who know what scum the CEO is. Once that info about the CEO become ubiquitous, then he'll probably really start to feel the hurt. Bad reputation hurts the bottom line.

I feel for the WF employees, but we can't let that stop us from doing the right thing that helps all workers in the long run. Besides, I bet that CEO is counting on us being too concerned about the employees to take strong action against the store.  


[ Parent ]
I shop at the store in Redmond (4.00 / 3)
and its a fixture for Microsofties in the area. Get them on board, and this particular store is toast.

Already Going (4.00 / 4)
I've been on a boycott of Whole Foods for about a year now.  Just a personal one that I talk up with my friends (especially those with real incomes, unlike my grad/law student friends), and in particular, those in the labor community.

Whole Foods is one of the worst kinds of anti-union corporations.  They actively bust unions (including the one that actually achieved representation here in Madison, WI) under the guise of corporate paternalism and "unions are a relic of a bygone era."  The CEO has even been publicly - as well as in closed-door meetings - fighting against labor law reform in the way of the Employee Free Choice Act, on top of the general practice of Whole Foods to bust unions.  

Good lefties shouldn't be shopping at Whole Foods anyway, regardless of the CEO's latest public Randian diatribe.  He's been an anti-progressive asshole for a long time.  Being an anti-progressive asshole isn't cause for a company to be boycotted (we'd probably have to live like yeoman farmer-producers if that were the case); using the company as a tool in the fight against workers, consumers, citizens, etc is the cause necessitating boycott.  

I think that a large-scale, mass public boycott of Whole Foods by progressives - especially one that seeks to evangelize to their current customer base - is rightly in order.  I'll support it and take action on it myself.  


Save money and join political protest (4.00 / 2)
both at the same time. Luckily I have many alternatives with healthy organic foods in my MA neighborhood. Plus a unionized Stop & Shop.

[ Parent ]
This Is An Excellent Idea (4.00 / 3)
I think you've got a very good handle on it.  

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

My view of your typical Whole Foods shopper (4.00 / 2)
is of an affluent SUV or Prius-driving yuppie who likes to think of themselves as left-leaning (but more because of social pressure and the belief that lefties are smarter than righties--which of course they are, by an order of magnitude, but we're talking strictly vanity here), who's in fact left-leaning on social issues, but right-leaning on economic ones, e.g. low taxes, less regulation (so long as their soy-guava smoothie is 100% organic and "free trade"), who believes (or wants to believe) that they're going to be healthier and live longer by vastly overpaying for produce and take-out, and is thus susceptible to sophisticated marketing.

Guilt-based marketing can work wonders with this crowd. Make 'em realize that they're more likely to "save the planet" by NOT shopping at Whole Foods than by shopping there.

Of course, this will also make it easier to tell the real lefties from the present and future Republicans (those who will go GOP as soon as it jettisons the mouthbreaters and becomes respectable and the Democratic party becomes more progressive and thus too "flaky").

If you do shit that you know hurts people and you can help it, you're not a leftie. Join the GOP already and stop trying to fool no one. Everyone else, stop throwing your money away at fake ego gratification and conscience relief. Whole Foods is a con, in more ways than one.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


Lifestyle Leftism (4.00 / 2)
Whole Foods is a shining example of the failures of lifestyle leftism.  Just buying stuff that's "fair trade" ain't doing shit.  

[ Parent ]
I like that term, never heard it before (4.00 / 3)
Sounds like "Limousine Liberal", or, my favorite (and one of the few things I agree with David Brooks about), "Bourgeois Bohemian". Hey, look at me, I've got a ponytail, drive a Prius and shop at Whole Foods! I'm like totally a liberal even though I work for Goldman Sachs or a big lobbying firm! I can have my wheatberry/millet cake and eat it too--only $12.98 a slice!

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton

[ Parent ]
Exactly (4.00 / 2)
And if it becomes vogue to think of Whole Foods as a poser company their whole business model is toast.  I think this could be very effective.

[ Parent ]
I just want to say that this whole line is conterproductive, bitter and unhelpful (4.00 / 2)
We are attempting to talk to people who shop at Whole foods, and we interject into the middle of it, "by the way you are an asshat and we hate your whole life life."

Never mind the world is complex, hard to deal with, and real information is hidden form us all by a press that uses us for bank account filling and nothing more.

How about a little sympathy, how about a little fellow feeling, how about remembering we are talking directly to those shoppers.

How about keeping the damn coalition together by not putting ones ego in front of the message.

And yeah, I am so politically brilliant and vanguard that I would never act like a loser, is just ego.

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
Some truth to that (0.00 / 0)
But talking through implications, expected results, expectations and so on should be encouraged.  When you are first batting around an idea you don't want any line of reasoning cut off; that happens latter as you narrow down.

Obviously, nothing like this would go into a pamphlet.

"Lifestyle liberalism" is an important issue on its own, btw.  Someone, I forget who, wrote a couple diaries on the subject.  They are part of our base and important to understand.


[ Parent ]
totally (4.00 / 1)
This thread is really mean and ugly.  Just goes to show you that conservatives don't have a lock on looking down on and mocking the 'other'.

I shop at Whole Foods because I like what they sell.  My wife drives a Prius.  Should we be mocked as not "real" liberals?  Do we need to avoid the big business of Whole Foods to prove ourselves to you?

You guys sound like pack of stereotypical catty teenage girls.


[ Parent ]
Its about refiguring premises and being thoughtful (0.00 / 0)
If one has thoughtfully made the choice that I chose not to make then more power to them. I've tried both other options discussed here, Whole Foods and Trader Joe's. I prefer Whole Foods, but I'm lucky enough to live in a neighborhood that has a locally owned alternative grocery store the is very much like WF but without the bells and whistles, so we could easily readjust our shopping preferences for those times that the farmer's market just can't supply our needs and desires - like in the heart of a Minnesota winter.


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
No (4.00 / 1)
I shop at Whole Foods and send my daughter to a fancy-dancy, liberal private school.  There is no point to mock -- at least on my part.

However, their is the very real issue that we all tend to fight for what is easy.  We more upper-classish liberals tend to focus more on social and environmental issues then economic ones.  Those from poorer backgrounds tend to focus more on the economy and the white ones are more susceptible to conservative populism.  That doesn't make the poor white democrats necessarily less liberal, but they can be.  So can we.

But people build social networks and form self-identities.  Whole Food shoppers tend to think of themselves as liberal as an actual form of self-identification.  Understanding that dynamic is important.  Some people think of themselves as conservative and completely internalize that concept -- it becomes a part of who they are -- even though they actually have liberal views on many issues.  The same can happen in reverse.

The important point, though, as far as this discussion goes is Whole Food shoppers seem like they will be particularly receptive to this kind of boycott.  If going to Whole Foods makes you feel less liberal and less politically active, you are less likely to shop there.


[ Parent ]
Agreed. (4.00 / 1)
I tried not long ago to post something along those lines and my post was hidden. This is not the first time I have noticed this recently. The left I have been talking to are so preoccupied with hating the right, there is little progressive or liberal thinking going on. Im so disgusted with the hypocrisy of my own party right now I am at a loss. It's incredibly sad.

[ Parent ]
Keep posting keep positive keep fighting. (0.00 / 0)
This a real hardball game sometimes. I try to keep a poiiunt about not calling our allies names for disagreeinbg, because damnit we need all our allies.

And our allies dont serve us, we serve each other.

Moving forward has to be together or it wont be done.

Thanks for posting, stay positive dont be driven away.

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
Let me be clear (0.00 / 0)
I do like some of the stuff at Whole Foods, particularly the prepared food. It's great.  I am fine with the fact that people want to eat local, healthy food. That's awesome.  However, shopping at Whole Foods isn't enough, nor is it any kind of political activism, or substitute for an organized push for change.

That's my objection.  I am very happy to see that so many people want to do something positive for the planet and for their health.  I applaud it.  What I want them to understand is that actualizing those beliefs will take more than just buying food at Whole Foods.  


[ Parent ]
Of two minds about this (0.00 / 0)
On the one hand, I find it annoying that people who are social liberals (gay rights, black rights, reproductive rights, etc.) sometimes oppose economic reforms that would help working or lower classes or increase tax fairness.

However, I'm glad there is a constituency that supports these issues of civil liberties.


[ Parent ]
Hey! That's me in an organic nutshell! (4.00 / 3)
I love the picket line idea. I'd have a hard time boycotting WF, because they're the only ones who sell half my favorite foods (and I let my son run wild there for a few hours every week or two--yeah, I'm that dad), but the day I cross a picket line is the day I'm strapped bleeding onto a gurney.

And wtf's up with the disdain for lifestyle leftism? It's a fine lifestyle--maybe not quite as sanctimonious as anti-lifestyle leftism, but still pretty smug. I adore smug.


[ Parent ]
The Status Quo is also Smug (0.00 / 0)
Somethings are just too precious to be sacrificed, especially when they directly impact one's own life and lifestyle.


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
I mean, have you seen the prices they charge?! (4.00 / 2)
For example, the people who work at Whole Foods could be negatively affected.

I'd be okay with a boycott that lasted as long as it takes for Whole Foods to start offering real health insurance. Come on, they can afford it.


No one's trying to put it out of business (4.00 / 1)
They're just trying to make Whole Foods live up to its implied progressive ethos. If they really cared about people like them make it seem that they do, then they'd:

--Lower their prices so that regular people could afford them
--Let their workers unionize and give them good benefits
--Support universal health insurance and care
--Open outlets at low and middle income neighborhoods

Of course, they probably won't do these things. So between their continuing their current practices and going out of business, I have no problem preferring the latter.

But it's worth a shot, no?

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


[ Parent ]
How about killing two birds with one stone? (4.00 / 4)
Given the movement towards getting rid of plastic bags and using reuasable canvas and cloth bags for shopping, how about if someone made a canvas bag that would sell for a couple of bucks, that would read

"I'm Trying to Save the World and Make It a Better Place Too: I Don't Shop at Whole Foods"

Or:

"Support Universal Health Care and Your Local Union: Don't Shop at Whole Foods"

Or something sufficiently trenchant and snappy that people will notice and look into and which will piss off Whole Foods and likely bring it some negative publicity.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


Mackey is small fry but could teach a lesson to naivetes ("libertarians") (0.00 / 0)
He's really not a "big-wig" in this society/economy.  Marginal in comparison to the Ruling Class. Having read some some of his writing, I'd say he's actually a pretty good guy compared to the average CEO of a typical American corp, and that observation should send a shudder (or two or three) down the average Betty's spine.

He's probably well-intentioned, but not very bright. Or, not grown-up yet, which describes Libertarians in general.


Yes! (4.00 / 3)
Boycot Whole Foods. Shop your local farmer's market instead.

Save Our Schools! March & National Call to Action, July 28-31, 2011 in Washington, DC: http://www.saveourschoolsmarch...

'Local Farmer's Market' is not a year-round solution; Purple Dragon Coop model is (4.00 / 1)
In NJ, where you can't grow much produce in January :-) , we have the Purple Dragon Co-op, which has worked well in suburban areas (IIRC, it doesn't work as well in urban areas because people don't have porches or garages).

Purple dragon buys organic food in bulk, then divvies it up every 2nd Saturday. A local coordinator's home is the ground zero for distribution, and members of each local group take turns dividing up the goodies on Distribution Day. They leave a check for the next pickup as they pick up their current batch. Groceries are left unattended in a porch or garage.

The groceries have a flyer inserted, in which there's a bunch of specials advertised. These can be for 'half portions' of fruit or non-produce items, like pasta, cheese, vitamins, etc. You have to let your local coordinator know ahead of time if you want to order anything extra. You include payment for these extra items in your check.

Unfortunately, they're not looking to grow aggressively (if at all). My impression was that the founder, Janit London, is very busy, and doesn't need to grow to make a living. However, I think she and Purple Dragon as a whole are very open as to sharing the details of their methodology. Here's their website: Purple Dragon.

I recently heard uber health food activist Gary Null say that he boycotts Whole Foods -  I think primarily because much of the food they sell isn't organic, but don't quote me on that. In any event, it's good to have choices, and yes, Whole Foods is very expensive. Finally, please note that because they've put so many health food stores out of business, there's just not as many options for buying organic as there should be. Hence, people's willingness to sustain a boycott is going to be limited, I'd guess, to 3-4 weeks. However, if you get them to join a Purple Dragon-like coop, they will have a strong incentive never to set foot in a Whole Foods, again.

That leads me to an idea I had years ago, that I passed on to Gary Null, which I'll now repeat. Unfortunately, I've no idea how workable it is, but now that we're looking at sustained, long term unemployment for many, it may be a better time to at least try such a thing.

My idea was to have a healthy foods cooking coop. Members commit to meet 1x-3x per week, where they pick up cooked foods that had been prepared by coop members, and where they themselves help cook once every week (or whatever frequency is required). Because cooking food is much more involved than just bagging groceries, and because I want to encourage a sense of community, I want people to be able to sit down and eat on their pickup days. (Hence, they're eating 1 dinner, and taking home 1 or 2 days' worth of other dinners.) So, in suburbia, that can mean that healthy cooking coops would be small, and meet and eat in the member's homes. In urban areas, they would need larger groups that would rent out, say, church halls, many of which have kitchen facilities. For larger endeavors, you'd want a coordinator who is always involved and concientous as to cleanliness, is a good cook, etc.

One of the reason democracy is not working well in America is because of the sense of isolation that people have. A cooking coop would help break down that sense of isolation, and hence have positive implications for civic life. Unfortunately, family life has also broken down, and a lot of singles are really lonely and not connected. A cooking coop would have positive emotional and mental health implications, also.

============

Somewhat off topic, but not too much, since there's not much point to forming coops if small organic farmers are being put out of business by large agribusiness, and thus coops can no longer obtain local organic food that is really organic. (My apologies if I'm mischaracterizing the following. I haven't really studied it, but I know that in general Washington D.C. and agribusiness is no friend of people who want health freedom and certifiably organic food.)

From Gary Null's web site, Still Time To Kill HR 2749!

Still Time To Kill HR 2749!

Here is the link for the Action Item:

http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27134

Natural Solutions Foundation
Health Freedom Action eAlert
July 27, 2009

Resent with Urgent Message

Still Time To Kill HR 2749!
After sending the below eblast this morning, we had another urgent message from Dr. Ron Paul's Legislative Aide, Normal Singleton:
"Bill back on today's schedule"
We have learned that today, July 28th, HR 2749, the Food Fascism Bill, is up for a vote again. Your push back took it off the floor yesterday according to our information.  More emails, one from every member of your household and family, are urgently needed.
Please also PHONE your congressperson's DC office NOW!

http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.shtml

Here is the link for the Action Item:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/t/1128/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27134

Click on it NOW, fill it in for every member of your family and then contact everyone you can reach to do the same. Even if you've done it before, do it again!
Your health, your life, your food depend on it.

Yours in health and freedom,
Maj. Gen. Ablert N. Stubblebine III
President

Note from Counsel: Often, controversial bills are on the vote schedule and then off it... several times. A few thousand phone calls and emails RIGHT NOW can make the difference! rf

HR-2749 Description from GOP website:

http://www.gop.gov/bill/111/1/...

Original eblast posted at:

http://www.healthfreedomusa.or...




435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


What you are describing (0.00 / 0)
sounds similar to buying a share in a CSA which are available in lots of places.

[ Parent ]
I think they have CSA agreements, but they do groceries, too (0.00 / 0)
Plus, I don't think they limit themselves to CSA's, though I'm not sure. How often do most CSA's distribute food?

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


[ Parent ]
Totally agree (0.00 / 0)
It's the participation in running the business and making the food by the members that it is important.  That produces a mindset shift from consumer to producer/owner.  This mindset is important because consumerism is passive and a poor base for citizenship. Production and ownership, on the other hand are a strong base for citizenship because they allow people to embrace their own agency.

[ Parent ]
Please consider grocery coops if available. (4.00 / 3)
Fortunately for me a grocery coop is an option and a welcomed alternative to Whole Foods.

Boycott Away - let's give them a taste of "free markets" by making a statement w/our $$$ and at the same time benefitting a truly local business in the form of grocery coops.

RebelCapitalist - Financial Information for the Rest of Us.


Can't believe this is even a question (4.00 / 3)
After reading that piece of garbage yesterday, I'll never step foot in Whole Foods again. And until yesterday, I shopped there 3-4 days a week.

I hope Twitter does start picking it up. It might get news coverage.


Whole Food's CEO is anti-union and anti-consumer coop (4.00 / 3)
It's time to wage economic warfare baby and shop at local shops or coops, regional chains and at our allies places of business.

For instance Costco is pretty blue and tends to treat it's employees quite well.  


Yes, and thats anti-"consumer coop" (0.00 / 0)
It is not a coop, if anyone misunderstood the space dash use.

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
Don't shop at Whole Foods anyway (0.00 / 0)
Went to Trader Joe's once. All the food was processed and packaged, except for the vegetables which were mostly from Mexico and shrink-wrapped. A corporate illusion of quality.

But, good luck, I know that the parking lots are always filled with up-scale cars and SUVs.  

"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


Yeah, not sure TJ's (4.00 / 1)
is a viable alternative.  Their foods tend to be of the highly processed, pesticided, preservatived, and overly packaged variety.  Even their produce items, recently supplemented with a modest number of organic items, come mostly in plastic bags and containers.

TJ is great on price, and their food is long on taste, but short on nutritional value.  I'm also not sure how well they compensate their employees, nor if their owner is also an anti-union winger/libertarian.  My guess is, given their low prices, they can't be paying their employees very well.

Time to spend more of my grocery money at the local farmer's mkt.  


[ Parent ]
Vicious (0.00 / 0)
lets attack a company and its employees and families because someone at the company dared to express their opinion in an editorial.  That will shut them up.  Unless you have a progressive opinion, you shouldn't have one at all.  Is this really where we want to go?

Yes (4.00 / 2)


--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
I'm with RR. Any political (4.00 / 4)
reaction to political speech is inappropriate. People can say whatever they want, but must shop where they've always shopped. That's just common sense.

[ Parent ]
"vicious" (4.00 / 3)
Yes, liberals are morally obligated to spend their money at businesses which oppose everything they believe in.

As I'm sure if Planned Parenthood or the ACLU opened a chain of grocery stores, conservatives would flock to them.

He's not "someone" at the company, he's the fucking CEO and founder.  Why the hell does the CEO of whole foods get WSJ op-ed space anyway?  Who the hell is he?


[ Parent ]
It's not his opinion that I object to. (4.00 / 1)
Our health care finance system is extremely broken and needs to be significantly reformed. If this guy wants to use his money and influence to deny millions of people insurance then he deserves our scorn.

Certain wealthy people in this country, which apparently includes the Whole Foods CEO, are actively funding and organizing opposition to health care reform. We must strike back at these people anyway that we can. As a libertarian I am sure that some point in his life he has said "Let the market work, let people vote with their pocket books." A boycott is voting with our collective pocket books in a way that the person being voted against knows he, or she, is under attack and why.

If $ are the only vote they recognize, then I am fully in support of casting that vote by with holding my $ from people actively standing in the way of much needed reform.


[ Parent ]
Many great ideas here (0.00 / 0)
Because I live where there are many small organic stores I saw through 'Whole Foods' from the start. They did not have the same range of fruits and vegetables as our little local dealers, and their prices were not any lower, and in many cases higher.

Now I'm living where WF is trying to put in a giant size store for a smallish community. We're praying it doesn't knock out our favorite other stores.

Trader Joe's is really a place for high quality bargains. Go with them!


High quality processed food is an oxymoron (0.00 / 0)
in my book, and the "bargain" pricing only makes it easier to consume more.  

"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
Ask shoppers what they think (4.00 / 2)
Boycotts take time and organization:

Here's what anyone can do right away.

Go around any Whole Foods store and ask the shoppers what they think about the CEO of Whole Foods campaigning against the Democratic Health care reform in favor of just subsidizing the insurers companies.

Ask the check out clerks as well.

Above all, contact the Democratic Clubs on nearby campuses (schools back early Sept)  if they would like a copy of the WSJ article and if they might consider picketing the nearest Whole Foods with leaflets directing shoppers to the article online.


This is very good. (0.00 / 0)
Above all, contact the Democratic Clubs on nearby campuses (schools back early Sept)  if they would like a copy of the WSJ article and if they might consider picketing the nearest Whole Foods with leaflets directing shoppers to the article online.

Actions like this on campus is a great way to introduce concerted political action into people's lives. Its direct, its effective and on time.

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
The boycott is on the Whole Foods Forums! Its the biggest topic now, very supportive (4.00 / 2)
http://www.wholefoodsmarket.co...

I too will be voting with my pocketbook and will be now shifting about $250 spent per month at WF to the local co-op.

I thank Mackey though for making his position clear so I am able to adjust my spending habits accordingly.

I'm sure my family and friends will also be grateful for the news as well.

Talk about misreading your customer base.

156 posts so far and counting:

I did not appreciate John Mackey's WSJ editorial today.  His ideas on the subject of health care reform closely echo those of John McCain and other prominent conservatives and serve the same purpose of trying to derail the chance we now have for real, meaningful reform of our health system.  As a physician, I am counting on this chance for my patients' and our society's well-being. I found nothing fresh in the views of the CEO of Whole Foods.



--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


Growers (0.00 / 0)
Any chance some of you folks might set up some stalls in the Whole Food and Trader Joe parking lots, just to show that there are alternatives?

Probably some licensing issue.....

"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


As I said above grocery coops are a good alternative. (0.00 / 0)
Here is a link to a list: LocalHarvest

RebelCapitalist - Financial Information for the Rest of Us.

WFM is International (0.00 / 0)
They have stores in England. They're much more geographically spread out than you think.

And I'm sorry, but I don't think a boycott would work. I'm guessing that the number of folks who would participate in a boycott is but a drop in the bucket compared to their total revenue.

But I think you've got the demographic right - the majority of WFM customers are sympathetic to democratic causes, if not activists themselves. It would be an interesting experiment to try.


Why wasn't your first thought: "Form a Union" (4.00 / 1)
The best way to dilute the power of owners and CEO's is to form a union, and as a customer to support a Whole Foods union. The united Food and Commercial Workers International Union UFCW

http://www.ufcw.org/

Negotiated wages, health care, and retirement plans
Defined work schedules
Grievance procedures
Reasonable workload requirements
Workplace safety protections and training
Protection from unfair treatment and favoritism by the boss
Job security and seniority rights
And a voice on the job to bargain for other benefits
There are over 950 UFCW local unions that belong to the UFCW International.  The local unions are located across the US, Canada and in Puerto Rico.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox