The Heart of the Matter

by: Mike Lux

Thu Aug 20, 2009 at 14:00


The DC establishment is in full attack mode, as usual with mostly anonymous quotes, trying to defeat a central part of the President's health care plan, the public option. These inside-the-Beltway conventional wisdom worshipers of both parties don't like the idea of big change or taking on scary powerful special interests, and they hope they can intimidate people pushing for real change. As one of the left-of-the-leftists (is that what LOL stands for?) being attacked, let me cut to the chase and go to the heart of the matter, because there are apparently some folks in the government with great insurance plans who are still puzzled why the whole "keeping the insurance companies honest" part of President Obama's plan matters.

The tens of thousands of organizational staffers, bloggers, and grassroots activists who are fighting our hearts out on behalf of the President's plan got into this fight because of the dysfunction of the insurance industry in terms of our lives. Like President Obama, we have seen family members having to fight with insurance companies while they are sick and dying. Personally, I have a friend with diabetes die because he couldn't get insurance coverage, and didn't have the money to take care of himself the way a diabetic should. I have family members with pre-existing conditions stuck in jobs they don't like for fear of not being able to get insurance should they switch. As a diabetic myself, there isn't a month that goes by where I'm not hassling with an insurance company bureaucrat over something, and as a small businessperson, I feel the financial pain of insurers raising my rates through the roof.

When the President talks about needing to keep the insurance companies honest, we know he is right because we see it, up close and personal, in our own lives. When the President and other Democrats take on the insurance industry, we cheer them on because we know of what they speak. This is what drives us. We are not putting everything we have into this fight because of our thrill at the possibility that the deficit might go down, or that doctors might order fewer test results patients don't need. That's all good, but it's not what is making us give money to Organizing for America, Health Care for America Now, Democracy for America, and the other groups fighting this fight, it's not what is motivating us to show up in bigger numbers than the right-wingers at town halls; it's not what is getting unions, MoveOn, DFA, USAction, nurses and so many other groups to organize lobbying visits to keep the President's plan alive; it's not what caused so many of us to give $160,000 in 24 hours to reward those members of congress who say they are going to hold the line on the public option.

This isn't symbolic for us, something we are doing just because the right-wing attacked the public option. We want real accountability, real competition, a real check on the insurance industry. So to all you insiders who find yourselves utterly mystified about why we care about a public plan, this is it: we want a check on insurance industry power, pure and simple. We want, as President Obama does, something to keep them honest. Tell us, if not a public option, what will accomplish that? How are you going to make that promise happen?

I can think of some ways that would help. Rate regulation, for one, as Bob Creamer and I suggested the other day. Repealing McCarran-Ferguson, the law exempting insurance companies from anti-trust laws, would help. Making it easier and faster to file class-action consumer lawsuits against insurance companies, that would also be a powerful check on insurers.

But you know what the funny thing is: these insiders panicking because they don't currently have the votes in the Senate, and attacking the very people who have kept the President's plan in the game all these months, they aren't talking about any ideas that would actually accomplish the President's goal of keeping the insurance companies honest. Maybe I would feel a little better about the co-op proposal if I'd seen any actual details on it, but not even the leading advocate for it in the Senate, Kent Conrad, has spelled out anything that would make analysts think it could remotely provide the check we are looking for on the insurance industry.

So Mr. President, us left-of-the-leftists have your back. We share your goal, so essential to health care reform, of providing something to keep the insurance companies honest. If the people attacking us for supporting your plan (some of them anonymous staffers in your own White House) want to show us an alternative that actually accomplishes your goal, we will listen respectfully. In the meantime, we will keep fighting our hearts out for your plan regardless of who attacks us.

Mike Lux :: The Heart of the Matter

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Anti-Obama attacks start... NOW! (4.00 / 1)
GO!

:-)


Wow (4.00 / 1)
I thought this was a Daily Kos for a second, with the prObama attempt to preempt dissent.

I bet you wish you had that one back.


[ Parent ]
I probably shouldn't be so quick (4.00 / 2)
to criticize Daily Kos. Right now, shooting up the rec list, is a diary by one of site's strongest supporters of Obama.

President Obama, You're Being Dishonest.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/...


[ Parent ]
Lakoff (4.00 / 1)
I just popped over there and Lakoff has a great post on messaging, actually.

[ Parent ]
Nah (0.00 / 0)
Mike's posts always get the same responses.  I find the predictability funny.

I barely go over to dKos, though, and almost never read the comments.  So perhaps this hits a nerve I hadn't realized was quite so raw.

And to be honest, one used to be able to predict certain responses to David's posts, with me being one of the predictable ones.  I suspect others found that funny as well.  Anyway, Mike is closer to the way I think, even if he pushes the "we are on your side" thing a bit harder than I believe.


[ Parent ]
That's not my take (0.00 / 0)
Mike wrote some great, uniformly well-received posts on the banking mess.

I can imagine some pro-Obama posts that wouldn't get criticized here at OL, but this one ain't it.


[ Parent ]
Check out his most resent posts on health care (0.00 / 0)
They all get the same reaction.  (Other than his alternative idea post, which was better received than I expected.)

[ Parent ]
Great Diary! This is why we fight (4.00 / 4)
So why isn't there someone in the administration making these points every single day? Where is the attack dog that will go after the insurance industry and point out all the horrible things they do -- keeping people sick and killing some -- for profit and bonuses. Michael Moore's 2007 film Sicko illuminated a lot of the problem, but these need to be highlighted every single day. Why isn't Biden or Sebellius or someone railing against this outrage. Why is that left to OpenLeft and the blogosphere?

Maybe this piece has some useful stuff in it (4.00 / 1)
But I couldn't get past that joke of a first paragraph.

The DC establishment is in full attack mode, as usual with mostly anonymous quotes, trying to defeat a central part of the President's health care plan, the public option. These inside-the-Beltway conventional wisdom worshipers of both parties don't like the idea of big change or taking on scary powerful special interests, and they hope they can intimidate people pushing for real change. As one of the left-of-the-leftists (is that what LOL stands for?) being attacked, let me cut to the chase and go to the heart of the matter, because there are apparently some folks in the government with great insurance plans who are still puzzled why the whole "keeping the insurance companies honest" part of President Obama's plan matters.

1. Obama doesn't have a plan
2. Yes, he did have a plan during the campaign and a PO was a central part, but now he describes the PO a "sliver" of a reform. Or, most recently (see Quick Hits) he said there's "nothing wrong" with a PO. His Times op-ed, in which he laid out the case for reform, didn't even mention a PO.
3. You want us to believe that Obama is "taking on" the special interests? How so? By cutting a deal with Big Pharma? By backing away from his commitment to a PO?

I'll read the rest of the piece now; maybe it gets less laughable.



Obama never campaigned on the public option... (0.00 / 0)
It was never part of his "plan" during the campaign... his plan was incredibly fuzzy, both then and now... It was one of my primary concerns with him as a candidate...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
That's not true (4.00 / 1)
A PO was part of his plan. Check out the diary I linked to above.

[ Parent ]
You sure he didn't say something like "Medicare for all"? (0.00 / 0)
The wording may differ, but I'm sure he promised some kind of governmental healthcare. Anyway, the public option is after single payer the only way to ensure there will be affordable healthcare available everyhwere. I guess you know damn well tha in some states a near monopoly exists with about 70% marketshare. Without public option, this will be hard to break up.

[ Parent ]
So tell me, what is your purpose? What does this help? are we making the last 4 senators move with this? (4.00 / 1)
Are we supporting the line in thre sand reps? Does this help anyhting or anyone. Does it keep the bill moving, does it keep the democrats moving toward more better dems, does it raise money? does it make the republicans more exposed?

eally ok, obama is just as flwaed as I said he was when we nominated him? supported his nomination, fought his election. I knew, I wrote I said ...

So what?
to what end are you working?

Do you think this is what is meant as pressure? do you think this is making room on the left?

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
There are numerous ways to answer you comment (0.00 / 0)
Here are a few...

There's always value in telling the truth...It's politically valuable to hit Obama from the left...Maybe I don't have a purpose, maybe there's no such thing as a purpose, maybe this is all a dream....


[ Parent ]
Hitting from the left is good, I posted Rep Weiners video explaining and calling for single payer yesterday. (0.00 / 0)
It feels like pressure from the left to me, it feels like criticizing Obama to me, it feels like a strong member of a varied coalition to me.

It seemed to me to hold the line on the line in the sand, and Rep Weiner has called on the line in the sand to be held, saying trying to pass a bill without PO to be a sure fail.

The video felt like there are a bunch of people who are moving toward the goal, even if they disagree, and there are some, who have no plan or wish to help at all.

.Maybe I don't have a purpose,

Maybe.

But I have a purpose, right now its getting this bill as good as relying on just 51% can make, as soon as possible, and as a package.

I think it is a game changer to do that. Not just this administration, for this part of this year, but for the long term.

There are so many people who dont believe that anything can ever be done that will make their lives better. This will help make the argument that this not true. You can if you work get stuff doen to make your life better.

It is central to my work that people end up feeling more empowered, all the time. More demanding, more sure that efforts matter, more connected to others working for the solutions.  

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
"left-of-leftists"? LOL indeed. (4.00 / 1)
Some of my lefty friends decry my politics as "mere-capitalist-reformer" or "incrementalist" or some such, for voting for over 40 years in elections I knew were rigged in favor of Wall Street and war, in some cases even voting for capitalists.

On healthcare, despite my belief in a lefty system -- totally socialized, from education to research to pharmaceutical and equipment manufacture to hospitals to caregivers, etc -- I'm willing to make a HUGE compromise, and settle for HR 676, socializing ONLY the insurance aspect, with a portion of the funding coming from a tax on the Wall Street casino.

Calling various machinations -- designed to subsidize Big Pharma and private insurance, while criminalizing single-payer attempts by the states -- within the authoritarian-right quadrant, "left-of leftist" is, well...

LOL!


Sorry, Dude! The "Left Of the Left" Is Code (0.00 / 0)
Want the rule of law to apply to everyone, even top Republican Capos?  Then you're "left of the left."

Want to avoid a quagmire in Afghanistan that's twice as long as the one in Iraq?  Then you're "left of the left."

Want to spend more on education and less on weapons to fight the Cold War? Then you're "left of the left."

Want to keep state parks open, and raise the tax on millionaires so they're paying the same rate as janitors? Then you're "left of the left."

i.e. -- part of a 60% supermajority or better.

Methinks that you are actually left of the left of the left... of the left.

Have I left anything out?

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


[ Parent ]
Left out... (0.00 / 0)
...a few things. Randomly...

"Want the rule of law to apply to everyone, even top Republican Capos?"

And DP capos, and the Wall Street capos that fund them both.

"...Afghanistan...?"

Out NOW -- and start closing, oh, say, 700 of our largest overseas military bases.

"...more on education and less on weapons..."

MUCH more on humanities education in particular, and MUCH less on the police state, drug war, prison, corporate welfare including tax subsidies.

"...raise the tax on millionaires so they're paying the same rate as janitors?"

Absolutely NOT. First, I favor taxing wealth, NOT work. As a heavy incrementalist compromise, moving at least in the direction of economic justice, I could accept truly progressive tax rates on ALL income with loopholes tightly closed, along with a transaction tax on speculation.

The website "Political Compass" -- vertical axis (social) authoritarian at the top and anarchist at the bottom, horizontal axis (economic) socialist on the left and neoliberal on the right -- puts me deep in the left-libertarian quadrant, at minus-8.83, minus-7.68 on their 10-point scales.

The closest I've ever come to voting for anyone in the opposite quadrant (right, authoritarian) was in 1972, which was also the only time I ever voted for a Dem nominee for prez.


[ Parent ]
Appearances Over Reality (4.00 / 1)
But you know what the funny thing is: these insiders panicking because they don't currently have the votes in the Senate, and attacking the very people who have kept the President's plan in the game all these months, they aren't talking about any ideas that would actually accomplish the President's goal of keeping the insurance companies honest.

Because the posture of concern is all that's required on cable tv to play the part of the liberal (or compassionate conservative, if that ever comes back in style).

Actually have any idea at all of what could actually work?  Not so much.

So why bother even thinking about it?

In fact, part of what stokes their anger is the very thought--however fleeting it might be--that because of you they actually might have to learn something.

Those who are entitled don't learn things!  That's for inner-city school kids.  Not them!  

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


We got obama's back, huh mike? (4.00 / 1)
Have you ever allowed yourself to serious consider whether he has ours?  

Thanks for giving us the democratic party establishment hack's point of view .... once again.

Z


If by that do you mean inspute of all the attacks he hasn't given up mentioning the Public Option, and will sign the Bill. (4.00 / 1)
Thats enough for me.

I want more, I will push for more, but thats enough for me.

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
yeah, i don't. (0.00 / 0)
i will work to support specific policies but even that's more about interactions with Congress. the Administration has made it clear that it thinks it doesn't need people like me. that's fine.

not everything worth doing is profitable. not everything profitable is worth doing.

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox