Succeeding Kennedy

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Aug 26, 2009 at 15:26


Even during this emotional time when we remember Senator Kennedy's remarkable achievements, there are at least three important matters of succession we must consider. First, who receives Kennedy's Senate HELP committee chairmanship. Second, if there will be an interim Senator. Third, who the candidates will be for the special election in January. This article touches on all three areas.

Senate HELP Committee
Senator Kennedy's chairmanship of the Senate HELP committee will need to be filled. Paul Kaine breaks down the likely candidates. The odds on favorite appears to be Mikulski:

A new chairman won't be formally selected until senators return from their August recess. Legislative business for the fall session is slated to begin Sept. 8.

The first Democrat in line in committee seniority now is Kennedy's closest friend in the Senate, Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn.), who shepherded the health-care legislation through the HELP committee in June and July.

Dodd, however, already chairs the banking committee, and he would have to give up that gavel in order to take up the legislative legacy of Kennedy.(...)

If Dodd were to pass on taking the HELP chairmanship, Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) has the next chance to take over the panel. But Harkin already chairs the Agriculture Committee, which is of critical importance to his home state, and Harkin is not believed to be interested in the HELP gavel.

That would leave Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) next in line to chair the committee. She has already been overseeing the education portfolio of that panel in Kennedy's stead, and she led the passage of major reforms to Pell grants last year. The HELP committee is slated to consider a reauthorization of the landmark No Child Left Behind legislation that Kennedy co-authored in 2002.

Will there be an interim Senator?
Massachusetts is one of only three states where special elections are held in the event of a Senate vacancy, rather than the Governor appointing a replacement. Given the details of the Massachusetts law, which was passed in 2004, that special election will take place on either January 19th or January 26th.

While that special election will be held no matter what, in the meantime the Massachusetts legislature is making moves to appoint an interim Senator, as per one of Senator Kennedy's last wishes. Now, via TomP, this might actually happen:

Elections Law committee co-chair Sen. Tom Kennedy (D-Brockton) said he and House co-chair Michael J. Moran (D-Boston) may bump up a hearing date for a bill that would give temporary appointing power to Patrick to Sept. 17.

"(The bill) was originally grouped in with the October hearing, but we're trying to take into consideration the interest of the legislators," said Kennedy.

Rep. Robert M. Koczera (D-New Bedford), who filed the bill, spoke to Moran yesterday and said he received assurances that his bill would be heard before the original Oct. 7 hearing.

There also appears to be support within the State Senate and from Governor Patrick:

Therese Murray, the state senate president, has said the state should not be without a second senator for long. And Mr. Patrick said Wednesday in radio interviews that he would sign such a bill if it reached his desk.

Whatever the current legal hurdles and unfortunate timing of this process, the ethics of the situation seem pretty straightforward.  There is a moral imperative to provide health care coverage to all Americans, just as there is a moral imperative to provide equal representation to all Americans.  Those values outweigh any process arguments we can expect to hear coming from the Republican Noise Machine as this effort moves forward.

Special Election
The Hill has a comprehensive look at the candidates:

Just about every member of the state's 10-member all-Democratic congressional delegation has been mentioned as a potential candidate, particularly Reps. Edward Markey, Richard Neal and three others who have already banked more than a million dollars in their House accounts.

Markey, who raised his profile after shepherding climate change legislation through the House this year, has $2.89 million in the bank. Neal, whose district stretches from the Boston suburbs west to Springfield, has $2.5 million in cash reserves.

Rep. John Tierney (D), who holds the northeast corner of the state based around Peabody, has $1.29 million in reserve, and Rep. Michael Capuano (D), whose district includes northern Boston suburbs Cambridge and Lowell, would start a Senate race with $1.2 million. Rep. Stephen Lynch (D) would launch a bid from his south Boston district with $1.39 million.

Former Reps. Marty Meehan and Joe Kennedy, Ted Kennedy's nephew, also have large House accounts and are considered top Democratic contenders, as is state Attorney General Martha Coakley.

Meehan, who left Congress in 2007 to take over as chancellor of the University of Massachusetts, Lowell, nonetheless has $4.8 million left in his congressional account. Joe Kennedy has $1.7 million in the bank.

Coakley has been seen as a potential Senate candidate for some time. When Kerry appeared a strong contender to lead President Barack Obama's State Department, Coakley commissioned a poll testing her chances.

On the Republican side, former Lt. Gov. Kerry Healey, former U.S. attorney Michael Sullivan and former Ambassador Chris Egan lead the list of potential suitors.

Massachusetts House Democrats have been hoarding money for this money for quite some time. Back in 2006, this made the Massachusetts delegation the primary targets of the Use It Or Lose It campaign to transfer Democratic money to swing districts. If you need a moment of levity today, listen to the old NPR story on the Use It Or Lose It campaign, including the part where the Lowell Sun calls it "a nasty shakedown by rotten political scoundrels." Classy!

Chris Bowers :: Succeeding Kennedy

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Succeeding Kennedy | 32 comments
Speaking of cash on hand (0.00 / 0)
Does anyone know who gets to decide what to do with the $4.5 million in EMK's account as of June 30th (or what's left of it)?


Me on Facebook
Me on Twitter


I Resent That Remark! (4.00 / 3)
including the part where the Lowell Sun calls it "a nasty shakedown by rotten political scoundrels."

On two grounds:

(1) We're dirty rotten political scoundrels.  We got dirty doing thankless hard work.  We're proud of being dirty, and should aloways be addressed as such!

(2) C'mon, Lowell Sun!  "Rotten scoundrels" are always dirty.  if you don't give us our dirty props, you could lose your hack license.  And if you're not hacks, you're nothing at all.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


Politico says that if Barney Frank were to run... (4.00 / 2)
...he'd win in a landslide, but will probably not do it... that would be a shame, really... I'd love to have Frank as Senator, if for no other reason that to annoy the shit out of Republicans...

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


What are you, a dining room table? (4.00 / 3)
Or just living on another planet?

I love that guy.

;-)

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton


[ Parent ]
ALmost the best damn reason I have heard yet. (4.00 / 2)


--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
Yes, Sen. Barney Frank... (4.00 / 2)
Would be the perfect successor for Ted Kennedy. I hope he reconsiders...

Yes, Virginia, there are progressives in Nevada.

[ Parent ]
for us nationally, yes. (0.00 / 0)
But inside MA, I wonder if they might want someone with more capacity to gain seniority.  Also, I'd hate to risk Frank losing his seat if there's a wide primary for the Senate.

[ Parent ]
Thanks Chris (0.00 / 0)
Important matters, tastefully and thoughtfully discussed. Life must go on, including politics. As Kennedy would surely have insisted on.

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton

while i agree with the moral imperative, (0.00 / 0)
I have to dissagree with the ethics.  I for one applauded the hard work of Senator Kennedy in 2004 in getting the Mass legislature to change the rules regarding Governatorial appointments.  I thought this move was genious on his part and the timing could not have been better given the then high probability that Kerry would win and his seat would be open.  

Although there was some grumblings about this by the Repubs and media, it quickley died out.  Move to the present, now with a Democratic Governor, the Mass legislature is asked once again to changes the rules to allow the Governor a temporary appointment.  

While the rebel in me says "heck yea", the ethical little man on my shoulder says "don't do it".  Regardless of what the Repubs and the media will say about this (which I really don't care), there is a real ethical dilema here.  Do we really want to be seen as the party that changes the rules when they benefit us?  I guarantee that the public outcry will be larger than we think on this one and will have huge implications later on.  Do we really want to place ourselves in this position?  


At the very least they could move up the election to november.... (0.00 / 0)
...when all the other elections are held.  They can use the excuse that it will save money and increase turnout (which it will)...

As far as changing the rules... well, healthcare is extremely important... I really could care less what the opposition things....

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
I agree (0.00 / 0)
shortning the election would be a smarter move.  to me, its not about what the opposition thinks.  We too have very moral and ethical followers who I would be much more concerned about.  

[ Parent ]
WE? (0.00 / 0)


--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
That makes the most sense (0.00 / 0)
or at least hold a primary then.  The problem is that it would be hard to really hold a primary before then.

[ Parent ]
to me (4.00 / 2)
When the voters of the state went for a Democratic Senator, a Democratic Governor, Democratic majority in both houses, calling it an "ethical" lapse seems far fetched.

New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.

[ Parent ]
Agreed, Christ its obviously the right thing to do. (0.00 / 0)
The law they passed top prevent an undemocratic action, is not quite up to standard, it needs improvement, its inability to deal with the needs of a Democracy has been proven TODAY>

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
Nonsense for gods sake (4.00 / 3)
The point is democracy. Having a special election is democracy, appointing a temporary stand-in to represent Mas, in A VARY IMPORTANT time is democracy.

I am sorry but that is shyte, garbage and nonsense. Laws are improved all the time, all the time, most often they are improved, when it becomes OBVIOUS that they fall far short in serving the needs of a democracy, and the meeds of any people, this time the people of Massachusetts.

There is nothing, nothing, nothing wrong with a temp appointment.

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
Dodd would be better off in HELP (4.00 / 2)
Being the head of banking, I think, has contributed to his low approval ratings.  Go get health care passed, not bailouts.


New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.

Well, it wasn't really Dodd's fault... (4.00 / 1)
Chris Dodd was just being the gentleman for taking the blame in Obama's place for the corporate giveaways in TARP. Still, I agree with you that perhaps switching from Banking Chair to HELP Chair could help Dodd immensely in boosting his approval ratings as he gets a good health care bill passed.

Yes, Virginia, there are progressives in Nevada.

[ Parent ]
I agree with you too (0.00 / 0)
It was unfair.  

And, I suppose, the fact that the bill is already through HELP with Dodd's leadership might mean that the job is done.  

New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.


[ Parent ]
So far, Barney Frank's my favorite... (4.00 / 2)
He has the passion AND the smarts to succeed. I hope he reconsiders running for Senate. Otherwise, I think Ed Markey or Martha Coakley (who as MA AG recently signed onto the Gill DOMA law suit) would make good progressives. Just my $0.02.

Meanwhile, I still can't believe Ted Kennedy is gone. Capitol Hill really won't be the same without him.

Yes, Virginia, there are progressives in Nevada.


I dont want to prejudge anyone, (0.00 / 0)
and I am predisposed to giving women the benefit of the doubt, any two equally good people, give it to the woman. I do not however have any such preference for Blue Dog women.

Barney is a smart progressive populist, with a long history of being unfazed by opposition and harassment. I like the guy.

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
They've left out Cong. Jim McGovern and the Lt Gov. Tim Murray n/t (0.00 / 0)


The excellent thing about this being a special (4.00 / 2)
is that none of the Congresspeople has to give up their seats to run.  In a regular general election, we could see a situation where like 8 of the 10 Congresspeople resigns to run, and a couple of Republicans sneak into Congress in the free-for-all.

The Crolian Progressive: as great an adventure as ever I heard of...

The health care public option as litmus test (4.00 / 4)
Here are the members of the Massachusetts Congressional delegation who signed the letter insisting that any health care reform bill must include a public option:

Bill Delahunt
Jim McGovern
John Olver
John Tierney
Mike Capuano

Plus, Barney Frank also pledged to hold the line on a public options, according to firedoglake.

These are the Massachusetts members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, minus Ed Markey, plus Bill Delahunt.  

Does someone have the story on why Markey's name isn't on the letter?  Keep in mind that he did vote for the Iraq War Resolution before renouncing his vote later.

While there are, of course, other potential candidates besides the Congressional delegation, these politicians at least have a record. The article from TheHill.Com said that all of them have been discussed as possibilities.  Of the names given credence because of their war chests - Ed Markey, Richard Neal, John Tierney, Mike Capuano, and Stephen Lynch - only Tierney and Capuano have come out clearly in favor of a public option.

If health care reform is the issue of our time, perhaps the netroots should get together and blackball those Massachusetts Congressmen who have so far failed us on this issue.  So at the very least, perhaps the activist left should agree that Richard Neal, Niki Tsongas, Ed Markey, and Stephen Lynch should not be the next Senator from Massachusetts.

Things You Don't Talk About in Polite Company: Religion, Politics, the Occasional Intersection of Both


Thank you fopr this work AdJ, great information to start with. (0.00 / 0)


--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
Not Neal (4.00 / 2)
Neal ranks 9th in a 10 member delegation and 97th overall on the lifetime crucial vote scale at Ptogressive Pinch.  He's no Ted Kennedy.

Successors, temp and permanent (4.00 / 1)
I'd like to hear more about Coakley, she seems like she might be a more pure progressive but I'm not sure. Lot's of good ol boy network dems in the rest of the crowd,s he strikes me as a little more ideologically driven.

As for temporary appointees:
-Robert Reich
-Mike Dukakis
-Bill Russell
-Howard Zinn


Loves yer temp list (0.00 / 0)
BTW is that pronounced "Green Vermontser"?

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


[ Parent ]
Is Rachel Maddow a Mass resident? (4.00 / 1)
Its "Green VerMonsTer", kind of a cross between a fan of the Red Sox's left field wall and a Vermonter, which is what I am.

[ Parent ]
Is Bill Russell a Democrat though? ... (0.00 / 0)
don't forget Noam Chomsky(he works at MIT remember .. and that would piss off the right even more than Barney Frank winning)

[ Parent ]
dukasis (4.00 / 1)
dukasis is the one talked up about-and it could happen fast. rollcall says after labor day the bills shoudl be ready and will likely pass. in the special i like coakley

Succeeding Kennedy | 32 comments
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox