But, Really - Ben Bernanke Is An Amazing Genius Who Saved the Economic Sector He Oversees

by: David Sirota

Thu Aug 27, 2009 at 20:04


But, really, seriously - forget about the past record, forget about all the bank failures that have happened already, definitely forget this obviously unimportant detail about massive bank failures, and clearly ignore this other obviously unimportant detail about those failures creating a potentially destructive pressure on the FDIC. All of that is just CNBC drivel, or Wall Street propaganda or 9/11 Truth-ism or some other LaRouche/Castro-referencing conspiracy theory. We just have to unquestionably accept as gospel the idea that Ben Bernanke is an amazing genius who saved the economic sector he's supposed to oversee - and any other way of looking at it is just right-wing or left-wing or fascist or communist or anarchist propaganda, or all of the above:

1,000 Banks to Fail In Next Two Years: Bank CEO

The US banking system will lose some 1,000 institutions over the next two years, said John Kanas, whose private equity firm bought BankUnited of Florida in May.

"We've already lost 81 this year," he told CNBC. "The numbers are climbing every day. Many of these institutions nobody's ever heard of. They're smaller companies...There's really very little lifeline available for the small institutions that are suffering."

Again, though - this is just right-wing and left-wing propaganda, and because a bunch of Bernanke's close friends in academia, the banking industry and the political establishment say he's teh awesome, we should just accept that judgment as ironclad fact. Makes perfect sense, especially when you consider Bernanke has made sure these stellar results are costing us a mere $12 trillion.

Really, with that track record, I have no idea why anyone would think to question his renomination. To do that, you'd have to be an absolute crazy person or an Obama hater or a communist or a fascist or...something.

UPDATE: I'm sure this is just right-wing propaganda, too - please ignore it:

Banks 'Too Big to Fail' Have Grown Even Bigger

Behemoths Born of the Bailout Reduce Consumer Choice, Tempt Corporate Moral Hazard

When the credit crisis struck last year, federal regulators pumped tens of billions of dollars into the nation's leading financial institutions because the banks were so big that officials feared their failure would ruin the entire financial system.

Today, the biggest of those banks are even bigger.

The crisis may be turning out very well for many of the behemoths that dominate U.S. finance. A series of federally arranged mergers safely landed troubled banks on the decks of more stable firms. And it allowed the survivors to emerge from the turmoil with strengthened market positions, giving them even greater control over consumer lending and more potential to profit.

Again, everyone is right - you have to be a crazy person to believe Bernanke is anything other than a fabulous genius.

David Sirota :: But, Really - Ben Bernanke Is An Amazing Genius Who Saved the Economic Sector He Oversees

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

unfortunately (4.00 / 1)
You have linked to someone who says 1000 banks will fail because of [Obama's] new bank regulations.  He's complaing that private equity can't buy up all the banks in trouble and profit quickly.

Try again.


New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.


Wow, you're right! (4.00 / 1)
I didn't bother to click on that link.  David linked to pure right-wing propaganda in disguise as news.  For example:

"Government money has propped up the very large institutions as a result of the stimulus package," he said. "There's really very little lifeline available for the small institutions that are suffering."

Note how this guy confuses the bailout with the stimulus package.  The public confuses the two all the time.  This, in fact, is the number one reason it will be nearly impossible to pass another stimulus bill -- the public thinks it is another bailout.  And this article purposefully adds to that confusion.

Ignore this article except for learning how to combat it; it is pure propaganda.


[ Parent ]
The number of links (0.00 / 0)
to right wing economic sites from left of center blogs really is fascinating. Last week there was a front page link here to the zero hedge blog, and MB on the front page on DKOS links to Misch's blog.  Each one is a right winger who thinks the economy will collapse because the government has intervened too much.

I can't think of a case in another area where this happens, and I think it speaks to the poverty of well written economic blogs from the left.

The irony is pretty profound.  And pretty disturbing.


[ Parent ]
Ya, you are right (1.00 / 4)
It's just propaganda and lies. I'm sure the FDIC isn't hammered. And sure, we haven't seen a huge raft of bank failures, and certainly won't in the future. You are absolutely right. Bernanke has done a really fantastic job - and all this evidence is just wild conjecture and conspiracy theory.

Good point - very, very convincing.


[ Parent ]
Huh (0.00 / 0)
I think that is the first time I ranked a comment by a front pager as a troll.

[ Parent ]
What would be convincing (4.00 / 1)
is if you quoted from someone not a rabid right winger, or even more profoundly actually presented some analysis as opposed to mindlessly linking to anyone because they fit what you wanted to say.

But you never present analysis, just conclusions that you agree with.  

You opposed the TARP - and it is now obvious that if the TARP had not passed we would be in the midst of a second great depression.  That is what the people who actually do the work, who look at the numbers, have concluded.

In the end you offer only slander, because you are not willing to look at the data and  actually do the analysis.

If you actually understood the markets, you would understand that there are a large number of right wingers who have been heavily short this market, and as a result are getting caught in one of the great short squeezes of all time.  They were betting, and are betting, that the economy collapses because if it doesn't, their entire economic world view will collapse.  These people are now yelling like stuck pigs.

As Yeats wrote:
They must to keep their certainty accuse
All that are different of a base intent;
Pull down established honour; hawk for news
Whatever their loose phantasy invent
And murmur it with bated breath, as though
The abounding gutter had been Helicon
Or calumny a song.  How can they know
Truth flourishes where the student's lamp has shone,

And there alone, that have no solitude?
So the crowd come they care not what may come.
They have loud music, hope every day renewed
And heartier loves; that lamp is from the tomb.


[ Parent ]
watch for even more banks to fall (0.00 / 0)
in the very near future.

bernanke uber alles.


[ Parent ]
Points (0.00 / 0)
1) "spent, lent or committed" is not the same thing as "costing", which would mean none of the money is never coming back.  That would be incorrect.

2) The conventional wisdom is that Bernanke fucked up before the crash but did a good job in crisis mode after the fact.  That CW is well worth challenging but seems to hold up under scrutiny reasonably well.  I certainly don't take your point of view that it all comes down to a dollar sign.

3) All that said, I think this was a bad appointment.  I hate how easily people become heroes and irreplaceable demi-gods in this culture.

4) We really needed someone who will push for regulation.  While Bernanke would be the perfect person to do that (and would be in favor of the choice if started), I don't see him doing that.  Seems like he'll just revert to the conservative he was before this all started.


This was an awful appointment (0.00 / 0)
because Obama has conferred enormous credibility to someone  who will provide cover every time there is a debate about progressive taxation and the role of globalization.

He was far more right than wrong in how he handled the crisis in September and October of last year.  Generations of right wingers will write books attacking him.  

But sometimes you have to look down the road and see the fights to come.


[ Parent ]
Rewarded for failure (4.00 / 1)
Apart from CEO's in the financial industry, is there any other sector that rewards failure so consistently? Oh I remember -- the Senate.

I mean, even Isiah Thomas got fired from the Knicks... eventually.

"I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that."
-Lawrence Summers


Got the right idea (4.00 / 2)
The humor is terrific. I didn't know Mr. Sirota could stick his tongue that far into his cheek. And yes, there was a factual error in the sourcing, but the essentail truth is that nobody should forgive Bernanke's past behavior and track record and no one should give Bernanke a free ride. Leopards don't change their spots, and I don't think he can think outside the box. Obama turned another opprtunity into another Wall Street no-brainer cop-out and ditched the mandate.  

A matter of definition (4.00 / 3)
Ben Bernanke has saved a class; his class. Of that there can be little doubt. That isn't the same thing as saving the country, or saving the world economy. To claim that he has, and reward him for it is both grandiose and premature.

You don't have to be a right winger to note that salvation of the kind which he offers us can at best be only temporary. The failure of little banks, no matter how many or few their number, and the impoverishment of people who work for a living are symptoms, not causes. The disease is something which no one whose diagnostic skills are as limited as his are can hope to cure, no matter how many trillions he has at his disposal.


James Galbraith and Dean Baker know their shit (4.00 / 2)
I wish Galbriath was on the FRBOG as he would be a great choice for chairman if he wanted the job. After all he buried Milton Friedman and A lot of times, he knows more of his stuff than Krugman(whom I still like, but strongly disagree) I have found who is unfortunately supporting Bernanke here. I'll ask a simple question; how can Bernanke of saved the financial system if it's still being held hostage and nothing has been fireproofed when we're still playing with the flammable financial instruments around the fireplace?

Sure when the fire started Bernanke went for the fire extinguisher so the Economic House didn't burn down, but shouldn't we not be playing with fire in the first place ie refusing to put back depression era laws, keeping too big too fail?

Those who want to try to frame this as a partisan issue don't know what they are talking about; this is Wall Street versus workers. Labor versus capital and capital could not essentially exist without labor as Lincoln once said.

So Bernanke didn't want to be responsible for a global meltdown; he still might be; strings are not existent or made of flimsy material. Ignoring history and the regulations FDR put in place is not impressive to those who want to defend him. Those of us against the bailout were against a rushed no strings attached loophole ridden swiss cheese bailout. We were not advocating let them fail; at least those of us on the progressive left because it does hit Main Street, but what is being done to make sure this doesn't happen again? Nothing.

As James Galbraith will tell you as well as Dean himself with clarity, Dean Baker had the ability to see the housing bubble before Ben Bernanke who gambled with our FDIC insurance money and the FDIC link Sirota provides is very relevant(I'm sorry though David, I am a big fan of yours, but the CNBC link makes the point, but it also has people slandering the FDIC's rules which they are even laxing form your other FDIC link which shows they are relaxing the same rules that CEO is complaining about. And he did mix up the stimulus and TARP. Your overall point stands, though) whihc shows the FDIC is hurting under Bernanke is not something to be happy about at all.

It's a shame Sheila Bair was betrayed by the Obama administration and Giethner. Personally since the only successful model in our country going down this road that doesn't involve leading to 1929 crash scenarios again and doesn't involve the U.S turning into Japan circa their lost decade and ZIPA(whihc we are already at)involves a strong FDIC.

Bottom line, it's a damn shame we have Geithner at the helm, because Sheila Bair's proposal to increase the power of the FDIC because it actually has a proven record. It pisses me off how her historically proven(S&L crisis) effective plan was neutered by Geithner who wants this failure to have more power instead of the proven stable record of the FDIC preventing bank failures.

Giving Sheila Bair more oversight instead of the FED whihc failed to regulate bank holding companies like Goldman Sachs would be something I would support because of the secrecy and lack of regulation and the proven FDIC model that stopped bank failures as we know it, till bubblicious Greenspan and Reaganomics came in and slowly started the dismantlement of the New Deal regulations and then Phil Gramm, Robert Rubin, Alan Greenspan and President Clinton finished the job.



1000 banks will fail? I'll take that. Please see this chart for some (0.00 / 0)
historical perspective:

http://blurblawg.typepad.com/....


Right. (0.00 / 0)
Do you have a constructive suggestion for how to turn our... skepticism of Bernanke's fitness for this post into something substantive?

Because I'm coming up blank. With Obama behind him, I suspect he'll sail through the re-nomination.


Sirota is obviously unSerious. (0.00 / 0)
All this quibbling about Ben pumping the housing bubble and keeping the Deadwood casino rolling is clearly not as important as his adherence to the tenets of the Neoliberal True Faith of Milton Friedman monetarism. Just ask Larry ("We are all Friedmanites now") Summers, or Tim (NY Fed Chief and dereg champion while the major crimes were being committed) Geithner, or Bob (Phil Gramm's boss at UBS) Wolf, or Austan ("NAFTA, yeah!") Goolsbee, or Hank (Goldman Sachs) Paulson, or Bobby (Goldman, Citigroup) Rubin or his acolytes, or Gramm-Leach-Bliley, or the DLC (of course), or Pinochet's ghost...

...or Obama, the greatest recipient of Wall Street, hedge funds, and other banksters' "contributions" in history.

David, you're obviously a DFH fringe wacko unSerious type like Galbraith, Baker, etc. You prob'ly even live in Denver.  


RE: "he's teh awesome, we should just accept that judgment as ironclad fact" (0.00 / 0)
MY COMMENT: Don't mess with a missionary man!

Well the missionary man
He's got god on his side.
He's got the saints and apostles
Backin' up from behind.
Black eyed looks from those bible books.
He's a man with a mission
Got a serious mind.
There was a woman in the jungle
And a monkey on a tree.
The missionary man he was followin' me.
He said "Stop what you're doing."
"Get down upon your knees."
"I've a message for you that you better believe."

P.S. My sincerest apologies to the Eurythmics!

P.P.S. Annie Lennox doin' justice to a whole lotta tight, black leather -  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox