Tough Month for American Preeminence

by: Chris Bowers

Tue Oct 06, 2009 at 18:25


Even without counting the Olympics, the past few weeks have seen some major blows to American preeminence internationally. First, Europe passed North America as the wealthiest region on Earth:

The crisis is transforming the global map of the world's wealthiest people, with Europe nudging out North America as the richest region, according to a new report by The Boston Consulting Group (BCG). The report, titled "Delivering on the Client Promise: Global Wealth 2009," is being released today.

Global wealth fell from $104.7 trillion in 2007, measured in assets under management (AuM), to $92.4 trillion in 2008 -- a decline of 11.7 percent. It was the first decline since 2001(1).

-- The steepest decline was in North America, where wealth plummeted by 21.8 percent last year

North America first passed Europe all the way back in 1919, right after World War One.

Also, a group of countries, led by Gulf states by including some ostensible allies, are working on replacing the dollar is the currency for trading oil:

In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf Arabs are planning - along with China, Russia, Japan and France - to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.

Apparently, the Iraq war is transforming the region. (Update: Per lord_mike in the comments, this story might be bogus and unfounded.)

Perhaps most telling of all, immigrants don't even seem to want to come to America anymore:

After nearly 40 years of recorded increases, the number of immigrants living in the United States remained flat between 2007 and 2008, recent statistics released by the U.S. Census Bureau show.

According to the Census Bureau's American Community Survey, the U.S. foreign-born population represented about 12.5 percent of the population in 2008, down from 12.6 percent in 2007.

A downturn in immigration of this magnitude hasn't happened since the Great Depression.

Finally, the world is now looking to China for a consumer spending based economic recovery, not the United States:

In the past, yanking the world economy out of the doldrums has been the job of American consumers, who have accounted for about two-thirds of U.S. gross domestic product and who for years bought enough imports to keep factories running from southern China to northern Mexico to central Europe. But as debt-laden American consumers tighten their belts, some officials hope that Chinese consumers will loosen theirs.(...)

So the government has been stoking the economy not only with big infrastructure projects, but also with incentives for things like new television sets. Mortgages are cheap and plentiful. Morgan Stanley estimated that, using conservative projections, China's total consumer spending will surpass that of the United States by 2018.

In the first seven months of the year, vehicles sold in China reached 12.3 million on an annualized basis, exceeding the United States for the first time ever, according to Morgan Stanley.

It is starting to look like American preeminence internationally will last for an even shorter period than expected. Part of me is pretty bummed by this, while another part of me considers things like country rankings abstractions that benefit neither the people in the dominant country nor those outside of it.

Either way, it does depress me that we didn't do more with our post-Cold War position of international dominance than we did. There was a lot of potential for good, but instead we mainly pressed ahead with an unsustainable economic model that crashed the world economy and brought us closer to the brink on climate change. What where our great national works from 1991-2008? Wars like Iraq and trade agreements like NAFTA unfortunately, seem to be about it. What a wasted opportunity.

Update: In the comments, AliceDem points out that the greatest achievement of the United States in the post-Cold War era is actually the Internet (or at least, releasing it to the world). I think that is right. That makes me feel a lot better, as the Internet is perhaps the greatest cultural work of all time.

Chris Bowers :: Tough Month for American Preeminence

Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The Internet (4.00 / 5)
What where our great national works from 1991-2008?

the Internet.
that and opening GPS to commercial use
both part of the Clinton/Gore record.


Very good! (0.00 / 0)
thanks for pointing that out! I actually feel a lot better now. That is a remarkable achievement.

[ Parent ]
A giant achievement (also, one fueled by the goverment) (0.00 / 0)
but not really a post-Cold War one. It was under development before that and it's development was not attributable to our increase in post war power.  

John McCain: Beacuse lobbyists should have more power

[ Parent ]
Your tax dollars at work (4.00 / 2)
The evil gummint did it, too. Cain't hardly tell what else they might get up to, if we could just get rid of Grayson's Neanderthals, and the Friedman/Rubin alligator shoe brigade.

Did anyone else hear the accounting of the GI Bill which was recited on NPR today? The ROI on free education -- as we've been trying to tell these ignorant assholes -- trumps anything Wall Street has ever accomplished, and by a wide margin. (Of course, that ROI benefitted the country as a whole, so it doesn't count.)


[ Parent ]
If we were a virtuous people (0.00 / 0)
our 4% of the world's population might produce 16% to 20% of the world's GDP.

But we're not.

We're a venal, arrogant, stupid people.

Just contemplate how much of a negative drag "Great Men" Petraeus and McChrystal are inflicting on our economy!

I've emphasized the horrifying consequences of societal failure, and they are many; but their is a silver lining.

Hell and cinders can catalyze great moral clarity from which will be the seed of a new beginning.

Rome had to fall for Philadelphia to rise.


The best thing that could happen to the US... (4.00 / 1)
is to be knocked of its perceived perch as king of the mountain. Being king of the mountain inclines one to hubris, and "pride goes before a fall." Maybe there is time to catch ourselves in the air and land on its feet instead of its butt.

If "American exceptionalism" and US "triumphalism" took a hit, maybe the US could get realistic about its strengths AND weaknesses and use its strengths to lessen its weaknesses.

Right now the US is blind-sided to its weaknesses and is deep in denial of them. That's a bad place to be.


The rise of China will continue for a long time too. (0.00 / 0)
Many are just getting Television sets.  When they start seeing how other people live, the demand for consumer products like central heat, refridgerators and gas/electric stoves will boom.  Many are still cooking over coal fires in their apartments.  The percentage of economic growth in China is still pretty dismal,....after all going from zero to one is a hundred percent improvement.

The mortgage industry will boom there and be cheap because every bank in the world will be competing for the business.  The outlook is very good for the average citizen because they have a job and will have it in the future.

I dont know why we should wonder about our preeimence lasting much longer.  We are losing jobs at a phenomenal rate.  Obama algmated Fiat with Chrysler.  Fiat is closing american plants.  I give Chrysler two years.



Conservative......CNN news:Nopenhagen: US PRES 2 WKS LATE ATTEND 1 DAY, GORE JOURNEY BY TRAIN.


They have a horrific imbalance to get out of, too, though (0.00 / 0)
the undervaluing of the yuan has essentially amounted to redistributing money from individual chinese people that would be consuming imported goods to the chinese export-driven factories.  They need to find a very narrow sweet spot where they can shift from an economy completely dominated by exports to one that more balances exports and domestic consumption without producing too much inflation, and without killing their export economy, either.

It's a better problem than ours, certainly.  And clearly, there is much room for growth for them.  But it's still quite a large and somewhat difficult problem.


[ Parent ]
30 years ahead of schedule (4.00 / 2)
It was inevitable that the rest of the world would catch up to us, but I strongly believe George Bush put us 30 years ahead of schedule.

I don't mind the rest of the world catching up, not at all.  I'm human long before I'm American.  But we've been in major decline these past few years, speeding up the process.

The important thing is what world we help create.  Pax Americana gives birth to ... what exactly?  If Bush had his way, the new world order would be one where might makes right, with, ironically, America not at all the mightiest.  I think we've already escaped the worst of that possibility.

Everyone talks about the EU and China, with a dab of India on the side.  Those are certainly the major players along with the declining United States.  I expect South America to make a big push, soon, as well, with these Olympics as a coming out party.


We'd be lucky to go the way England went (0.00 / 0)
Of course, as we speak, the usual suspects are trying to make sure that we go the way Germany went instead. It would please me no end were we to try Cheney, Krauthammer and Kristol before Armageddon, rather than after. If nothing else, it would take us a long way toward persuading the civilized world of our bona fides, and make it easier for Emperor Obama to abdicate the warlord part of his responsibilities.

[ Parent ]
Does South America have a middle class? (0.00 / 0)
Are their leaders willing to make one?

China and India are well on their way to real, 200-million-plus middle classes.  Europe has one, and America hopefully will continue to.  Russia has 100 million extremely well-educated but impoverished people.

I don't know what the population base for a South American push would be.  Brazil's class structure is horrifying, and Argentina and Chile are too small.  Colombia and Venezuela I know less about, but my vague impression is that their class structure is almost as bad as Brazil's.  

If it turns out to be possible to change one's class structure within a generation (I guess the GI Bill maybe did?), I'll be really really interested.


[ Parent ]
The currency thing is unfounded... (4.00 / 1)
There are no credible sources to that story, and it seems that someone is trying to rig the gold speculation market.

Take that story with a HUGE grain of salt!  Bloomberg has already essentially dismissed it.

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


Good to know! (4.00 / 1)
Will update with qualification.

[ Parent ]
hope and change! (4.00 / 2)
Really, for the past 30 years the economic history of the US has been: 1) dismantling the manufacturing base; and 2) redirecting resources into suburban sprawl and the financial sector. Now those two things have simultaneously (and not coincidentally) crashed. We're going to have to reach way far back for a model that works for us again - or invent something altogether new. Given that the wealthy interests seem ever more entrenched and determined to direct all their power towards holding on to their prerogatives, with an ever diminishing sense of social responsibility for the society which allowed them to accumulate their wealth, I don't see a solution coming down the pike anytime soon.

But yeah, the internet is neat.


California (0.00 / 0)
If the Silicon Valley people can give us one more technical revolution, in energy, on top of the computing revolution they already gave us, then America can be reasonably proud of its accomplishments 1991-2020, Iraq war notwithstanding.

The climate change delay is toxic and inexcusable, but if we get some powerful and rapidly deployed technology, we might be able to break even as far as the national conscience is concerned.  

Destroying our own middle class is extremely short-sighted though.  I hope for some real reversals in that trend over the next eight years of Obama legislation.  Changes in labor law, health care, financial practices, and energy consumption could go a long way toward rebalancing the middle vs the top.  There's more cause for doubt than hope on that front, but I honestly just can't handle that so I'm choosing to be optimistic until I just can't be any longer.

It looks like we get a public option, for instance.  Hopefully Wyden or the House will open it up to everyone.


[ Parent ]
This and the piece on the Olympics (4.00 / 4)
really bother me.  

If you want to take a look at American Accomplishments since 1991, take a look at the winners of the Nobel Prizes.  If you want to go back to WW2, the list would be very long, and include things like the cure for Polio and the invention of the transistor - the latter invention remade the World.

The rise of China is the rise of a totalitarian state, and yet some on the left seem to take glee in having them supplant us.     The meeting (which was bogus by the way) that got so much play around the net last night was notable for the fact that most of the attendees were totalitarian states.  

This should be REALLY disturbing to people.   We can see a point in the not so distant future when the most powerful economic entities will also be totalitarian or at best authoritarian (and spare me the nonsense that the US is an authoritarian state).

The Internet is a big place, and I have no desire to play the troll here (I do respect the people who write here save one), so I am going to a break here (which will probably be a relief to everyone).

Peace.


I'd rather Europe supplant us than China (4.00 / 1)
but someone should.

I wrote a position paper in college about healthcare where the question posed was "Why does the United States not have universal healthcare despite being the world's only superpower?"

My position was The United States does not have universal healthcare BECAUSE we're the world's only superpower...in that role, it somehow became our responsibility to defend everybody, so we were forced into building this massive expensive military that sucked up most of our budget, while the rest of the Western world didn't, since we defended them, their military budgets could be smaller, allowing them to focus on other things, like healthcare.


[ Parent ]
It's not that (4.00 / 2)
In 1945, Britain was still an empire. A heavily indebted empire, yes. An empire badly overstretched by war, faced by strong nationalist movements in South Africa and India and nascent ones elsewhere, and an empire that was definitely on the way out. But still an empire.

Yet despite this global military reach, costing far more than we could reasonably afford, and despite the continued necessity for heavy military deployment in Europe, we still instituted a national health system. And a pretty good one at that - we had to compromise on prescription charges and dental care isn't free for adults, but it's free at the point of use and completely universal.

America could have done the same and more. Your economy wasn't nearly as broken as ours. Your industrial cities weren't bombed-out husks. You could still afford to keep lending billions to help an entire continent rebuild.

America never had healthcare because nobody ever made it. It comes down to the lack of working-class organisation, not down to defence.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog


[ Parent ]
not so fast professor (0.00 / 0)
we were forced into building this massive expensive military that sucked up most of our budget, while the rest of the Western world didn't, since we defended them, their military budgets could be smaller, allowing them to focus on other things, like healthcare

we spend the largest share of GDP of any country in health-care:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H...

it's not like we spend all our money on the military and all we had left was $1,000 per person for health-care: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

the problem isn't money
the problem is greed


[ Parent ]
Don't go, but if you do.... (4.00 / 2)
We can see a point in the not so distant future when the most powerful economic entities will also be totalitarian or at best authoritarian (and spare me the nonsense that the US is an authoritarian state).

We'd be happy to spare you. History might not. You see, our grant of immunity is about to expire. That concerns many of us who aren't necessarily holding candles for the Chinese Communist Party, or either the Indian or African National Congresses, for that matter. If you don't know that about us, you don't know much at all.


[ Parent ]
authoritarianism will hold China back (4.00 / 1)
If China miraculously becomes a democracy, then it could potentially take much of the role of the US. I think Chinese society has the potential to be as open and welcoming to immigration/diversity as the US is (and, despite all the rough edges, make no mistake that the US is near the top of societies tolerant of diversity). But the authoritarian government has produced a huge gap in the understanding of ethnic/cultural/social differences, and I think it will take at least a generation before China can have the social freedom to really take off in influencing world affairs. China is also trapped by its dollar reserves as much as (or maybe even moreso than) we are - they couldn't sell dollars off fast enough to avoid getting bit in the ass by the plummeting value of their remaining reserves, and they'd severely destabilize all of their major trading partners in the process. China is a rational actor - dumping their dollars will never happen, and they'll have to deal reasonably with the US for the decade or so it will take for them to gradually ease out of the dollar.

India is a more likely eventual replacement/rival for the US - they've got a tradition of democracy firmly established, and they've spent a lot of time in the last century figuring out how to deal with a diverse society. Of course, the same traits make them more likely to be a collaborative rival than an antagonistic one - I could imagine a relationship more like that of the US with Europe.

I agree that there is a danger of authoritarian regimes causing a good bit of trouble around the world in the near future, but I don't really see it being anywhere near as bad as what the Great Depression brought. That said, the US has lurched quite a bit to the authoritarian side - enough that Europe is winning out as an attractive place to live for many people who have the choice. There should be no doubt that a significant faction in the Republican Party strives to turn us into no less an authoritarian state than China is.


[ Parent ]
India's more disorganised (0.00 / 0)
That's obvious enough - it's more democratic - but it's slowed development. There's an Indian middle class, but for the urban poor things are as bad as ever and the rural poor get ignored.

Worse, there's little discussion of economics in their interal politics. There are no real socialists or social democrats. Even the Communist Party has had a neo-liberal rebranding, whilst the Maoist rebels are essentially just bandits.

When India does something to make life liveable for its bottom 50%, then it'll be a world power able to compete with the US. Until then, it's not going to grow nearly as fast as it should.

Forgotten Countries - a foreign policy-focused blog


[ Parent ]
Yep (0.00 / 0)
I've got no first hand experience of India, so I'm sure my impression is off. But it does seem like most of what you've written is nearly as applicable to the US.

Barring a miraculous conversion to open democracy in China, it still seems to me that India is more likely to succeed in the long term. After all, China's space program put yet another person into space - India's space program found water on the Moon.


[ Parent ]
My hunch is that China is less totalitarian that it tries to look. (0.00 / 0)
As in, the central government has a lot less control than it wishes it did, and actively seeks to appear to have.  I think it's become the lady riding the tiger.  I hope that there is a fairly free society swirling beneath it, and that as with the Iranians, they will cast it off when the time finally comes.

Has anyone yet managed to sharply and permanently curtail a prosperous and productive middle class?  The fascists, maybe: Mussolini, Franco, Hitler if he hadn't launched the war.  I wish I knew more about the Korean transition from authoritarianism to democracy, because I expect more or less the same from China.


[ Parent ]
Yeah, but exceptionalism… (4.00 / 1)
...breeds obnoxiousness, no? Without sounding isolationist, I'd say that if we got our own house in order--and I actually believe we on the left are looking at the first real opportunity to have significant impact in quite some time--our international standing will increase by example. Americans worked pretty hard for prosperity in the mid-20th Century, then squandered it all on get-rich-quick schemes that only benefitted the few. If some of this country's wealth--and there's still plenty of it--allows the US to take better care of its citizens, I honestly don't care if some other country has more.

"This ain't for the underground. This here is for the sun." -Saul Williams

Wow (0.00 / 0)
the Internet is perhaps the greatest cultural work of all time.

just.... wow.


"wow" (0.00 / 0)
He types at home to a bunch of strangers on the internet.

I think Chris is clearly correct about this.  Culture is all about communication, and the ability for people of all walks of life to communicate, meet and share with people across the globe.

The internet is in the process of largely replacing books, newspapers and magazines, the telephone, radio and TV.  That is basically everything.


[ Parent ]
"wow" (0.00 / 0)
After reading all of these posts, I realize that we need real leadership in our white house and the congress.

We don't need a this group of concensus making, poll taking bunch, of never making decisions, do nothing leaders. It's no wonder that Sara Palin makes them squeamish.  

Conservative......CNN news:Nopenhagen: US PRES 2 WKS LATE ATTEND 1 DAY, GORE JOURNEY BY TRAIN.


[ Parent ]
I didn't say I disagreed. (0.00 / 0)
I'm not sure I do, but I'm not sure I agree either.

Mostly, I just think the statement is pretty ballsy.

I guess I consider the internet primarily a cultural medium rather than a cultural work in itself. It serves to speed things up and make things easier, and it likely will yield/has yielded entirely novel forms of cultural works. But primarily the cultural work that happens on the internet is the same as what's happened in other mediums for centuries.

The internet is radically changing our society, and it's mind-boggling to be living through it. But is the impact on society truly greater than the printing press made in its time (to name one example)? I don't know.


[ Parent ]
If you factor in the mobile internet too, that is now developing and will oneday be rockstar, (0.00 / 0)
then I think the internet's being equal to the printing press becomes a pretty easy call.

Greater than is tough.  Comparable to, sure.


[ Parent ]
American Preeminence (0.00 / 0)
Actually, a great many Americans have always hated American preeminence-look at the Antiwar movement, the flag burners, the opposition of such diplomats as the late George Kennan, the refusal to serve in the various wars and the consequent low troop levels, and so on.  The right in America is really kept in power only by default; i.e., not by the right winning, but by the left losing all the time.  

That, in turn, could be due to the lack of a working class organization.  But then why is that? We have a huge left here, it just does not talk about social and economic issues.  It talks about everything else-the environment, peace, anti-militarism, animals rights, abortion rights, gay rights, etc.-but not this.  And also, when are women, gays, African-Americans, going to start talking about these issues?  Indeed, with characters like Gov. Paterson and his attitudes towards the ultra-rich it is no wonder that these causes are viewed with indifference.  


Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search