Nobel Committee: We Really Hate Republicans

by: Chris Bowers

Fri Oct 09, 2009 at 12:00


I will have a post up a little later looking at the merits of the Nobel Committee's decision to award President Obama with the Peace Prize. For now, however, I want to focus on the messaging of the award. It is pretty great:

Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts.(...)

Thanks to Obama's initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.(...)

His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population.

Shorter Nobel Committee: we really hated unilateral Republican foreign policy. In fact, we hated it so much, we are going to give President Obama the award pretty much for just not being a Republican. Just having the United States talk to other countries is good enough for us.

Seriously--it is hard to read this award as anything but the Nobel Committee giving the middle finger to American exceptionalism as the driving force behind American international relations.

The messaging from the DNC in response to Republican outcries is pretty exceptional, too:

The Republican Party has thrown in its lot with the terrorists - the Taliban and Hamas this morning - in criticizing the President for receiving the Nobel Peace prize. Republicans cheered when America failed to land the Olympics and now they are criticizing the President of the United States for receiving the Nobel Peace prize - an award he did not seek but that is nonetheless an honor in which every American can take great pride - unless of course you are the Republican Party. The 2009 version of the Republican Party has no boundaries, has no shame and has proved that they will put politics above patriotism at every turn. It's no wonder only 20 percent of Americans admit to being Republicans anymore - it's an embarrassing label to claim.
.

Wow! That is just about the most aggressive, hard-hitting rhetoric I have ever read from a Democratic Party committee. It is like Alan Grayson wrote this response.

So, say what you will about the merits of the award--which I will discuss a bit later on--but the messaging is phenomenal. The world gives the finger to Republicans, Republicans can once again cheer against America, and Democrats actually get aggressive in their response messaging. That's not nothin'.

Update: Just to be clear, I like that the DNC is willing to be so aggressive, not that they are calling everyone who disagrees with the award Taliban sympathizers.

Chris Bowers :: Nobel Committee: We Really Hate Republicans

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Republicans want (4.00 / 3)
America to fail.  Pass it on.  It's true and people are beginning to see it.

Not quite (4.00 / 3)
-it is hard to read this award as anything but the Nobel Committee giving the middle finger to American exceptionalism as the driving force behind American international relations.

Obama is unapologetically continuing a  foreign policy based on American exceptionalism, and the Nobel Committee, by awarding him, is accepting it, if not endorsing it.

What they are rejecting is the fanaticism of the Bush-Cheney regime.  


I really hated it when the Republicans called (0.00 / 0)
the Democrats unAmerican or compared them to terrorists.

Can't say that I like it any better when the Democrats do it either.

Think that the DNC could have made their point just as well without the first sentence.


I like it a lot! (4.00 / 2)
...time for the GOP to taste their own medicine!

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
Anti-americanism against the right will never work (4.00 / 1)
and is deeply dishonest rhetoric. In some ways, the conservatives are anti-American in the sense many of them would rather see the country do poorly than do well in a way that undermines their ideology. But disagreeing with the awarding of a Peace Prize is not unAmerican. If we adopt their rhetorical standards, we will have no objection when they are turned on us which they will be and by Democrats. We should not applaud the DNC calling anyone unAmerican, among other reasons because they would really rather apply that label to progressives than Republicans as they did long and loudly during the Bush Presidency. Don't be fooled by this outlier.

[ Parent ]
that DNC message is great (4.00 / 1)
dr. grayson is working his magic

I don't understand this at all (0.00 / 0)
I voted for Obama, and given a similar choice among alternatives, would do so again.

But I cannot understand what besides wishful thinking would have motivated the committee to believe he's a worthy candidate for the prize, let alone the winner.  

Hopefully, this gives him some leverage in the middle east if he really believes that Israel should withdraw to the pre-1967 Armistice Line.  Not that it matters to people like Bibi and Avigdor Lieberman, but now they'll be refusing not just an American President, but the ostensive embodiment of peace.    


Well, the President's a thoughtful guy… (4.00 / 1)
...who clearly cares what folks think of him. Don't think this prize won't inspire some soul-searching about those wars we still happen to be in. True change is another story, however.

"This ain't for the underground. This here is for the sun." -Saul Williams

while repbublicans are having a field day with this, (4.00 / 1)
its not just them.  take a good look at all the left/Dem blogs including this one.  (tatere post today).  It sounds like there is a general concensus on this issue.  what the heck were they thinking.  as I posted elswhere, I just don't believe Obama has earned a place with King or Mandela at this point.  You shouldn't win something just because you have a "to do list".  If wanting world peace is the only criteria, then every beauty contestant in the Miss America contest should at least be nominated.  

Greenwald gets it right. (4.00 / 2)
"Apparently, according to the DNC, if you criticize this Prize, then you're an unpatriotic America-hater -- just like the Terrorists, because they're also criticizing the award.  Karl Rove should be proud. Maybe the DNC should also send out Joe Lieberman's 2005 warning that 'in matters of war we undermine Presidential credibility at our nation's peril.'"
http://www.salon.com/opinion/g...

No, Bowers is right.... (4.00 / 2)
....it's time to hit back at the GOP the way they hit at us.  They don't play clean, neither should we.  I like the new backbone of the DNC.  It's about damn time!

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
this place is schizophrenic (0.00 / 0)
can't be good for page views....

Who cares? (4.00 / 1)
The best thing about Open Left is the Open part.

In a world where things change so fast that we don't have the ideas today to fight the problems of tomorrow, we need honest open discussion.

Page views are for ego-strokers.


[ Parent ]
page views provide income for bloggers. (0.00 / 0)

page views suggest that a blog is focused and mission driven, or not.


[ Parent ]
That's not your business, aiko! (0.00 / 0)
If you think you can do it better, simply start your own blog.

Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested, we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back, nor did we falter

[ Parent ]
what? (0.00 / 0)
it was a comment directed at chris. not you. not paul. but it must have hit a chord.

[ Parent ]
These are open discussions. Everybody can add his two cents. (0.00 / 0)
And it's my opinion that the page views of OpenLeft are not your business. Maybe a more populist message would bring more clicks and more income, but Chris isn't the type of guy who would stremaline his stories that way. And that's his decision, not yours and not mine. Again, if you have some ideas about how to maximize page views, why not try them at your own blog?

Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested, we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back, nor did we falter

[ Parent ]
are you Matt Stoller in disguise? (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Hehehe, no, not at all. (0.00 / 0)
But I would like to know how Stoller is doing recently, too.

Let it be said by our children's children that when we were tested, we refused to let this journey end, that we did not turn back, nor did we falter

[ Parent ]
Rhetoric as Reality (4.00 / 2)
I agree with everyone that Obama hasn't accomplished much, yet.  And of what he has done, much of it is in the wrong direction.

But despite that, it is also true that "Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics."


For all the orgasmic joy in Obamaville (0.00 / 0)
this is a really bad thing.

Obama:

To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who've been honored by this prize, men and women who've inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace.

Well, Barack, you should always be honest (or keep your mouth shut)

and you are correct, you don't deserve a peace prize.

So decline the prize.

Instead what we get from the rest of his statement:

yadda, yadda, yadda, I'm accepting it anyway.

When this shit boomerangs, we are going to be in a world of hurt.


When this shit boomerangs? (0.00 / 0)
WTF does that even mean?

[ Parent ]
I haven't seen the SNL sketch (4.00 / 1)
but wasn't the gist that fake Obama admitted to not accomplishing most of the goals he set out to do? And that comes out a week before this announcement. The messaging against exceptionalism may be good, but I'd much prefer that messaging was generated in house by our voices. And as a scientist, I hope they don't start using those prizes for messaging purposes.  

"I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we should face up to that."
-Lawrence Summers


Because, ya know, META-peace is so much better... (4.00 / 1)
... than actual peace.

Which I appreciate, since it makes 1984's "War is Peace" seem, so... crude. Well done!

I am in earnest -- I will not equivocate -- I will not excuse -- I will not retreat a single inch -- AND I WILL BE HEARD.  


Orwell 2.0 (0.00 / 0)


"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
ha (0.00 / 0)
chris your take on this is funny and true, i love it

whatever you think people owe you, that is what you owe people

The Dead Pony Award (4.00 / 2)
This is quite right:

Shorter Nobel Committee: we really hated unilateral Republican foreign policy. In fact, we hated it so much, we are going to give President Obama the award pretty much for just not being a Republican. Just having the United States talk to other countries is good enough for us.

If the Dems had elected a dead pony as President, they would have given the Nobel to the dead pony.

"Senate passes expanded GI bill despite Bush, McCain opposition"


On the other hand (4.00 / 1)
Obama is not a dead pony.

To the extent that he actually IS as thoughtful and self-reflective as he appears, it may a good thing that he does not deserve the Prize - yet.

Can it be a bad thing to have a President that feels as though he has to earn a Nobel Peace Prize during his time in office?  

"It sounds wrong...
     ...but its right."


[ Parent ]
to be sure (4.00 / 1)
The 2009 version of the Republican Party has no boundaries, has no shame and has proved that they will put politics above patriotism at every turn. It's no wonder only 20 percent of Americans admit to being Republicans anymore - it's an embarrassing label to claim.

Now, to be sure, this does not mean that we will not continue to warp major legislation in the hopes of attracting Republican support. Because..... hey, Nobel!

not everything worth doing is profitable. not everything profitable is worth doing.


Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search