The Tale of Two Supermen - And What It Says About Our Idiotic Drug Policies

by: David Sirota

Fri Oct 23, 2009 at 08:58


Lance Armstrong and Michael Phelps are probably the only two athletes that we can safely call real-life, modern-day Supermen. Their physical achievements are unmatched - and they have both become international megastars because of that.

Unfortunately, though, the public treatment of these two icons, while similar in many respects, has diverged when the two have come into contact with drugs. One has been treated like a pariah, another has been financially rewarded - and, as my new newspaper column shows, the double standard is a powerful commentary on our nation's absurd narcotics policy.

Why do we as a country encourage the consumption of drugs that are far more harmful than some of the drugs we outright criminalize? Why do we shun even private consumption of the safer drug, but promote - and financially reward - the public promotion of the dangerous one?

Why, in short, do we ignore scientific fact in our drug policies?

These are tough questions that Phelps and Armstrong raise in their Tale of Two Supermen - questions that I try to answer with the help of this important book, which I strongly suggest you read (after, of course, you check out my column today).

David Sirota :: The Tale of Two Supermen - And What It Says About Our Idiotic Drug Policies

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Yeah (0.00 / 0)
I gave up on being angry about marijuana hypocrisy a long time ago, just for the sake of my sanity. It's all just too much sometimes.

(Here's a biographical tidbit: while we know that marijuana is not this nefarious "gateway drug", for me the obviously absurd laws against it were my gateway to a broader skepticism about the law and the criminal justice system in general.

Not that that wouldn't have happened anyway, but in the event that's how it did happen.

So the argument that stupid drug laws generate disrespect for the law in general was true in my case.)

When I look at corporatist America, I think the decriminalization people have been going about this all wrong.

Now that hi-tech has allowed the development of all these special weed strains, these guys should constitute themselves as a business lobby. "This stuff is patentable! This can be an upstanding capitalist business! Hi-tech and all! And of course a good campaign contributor."

http://attempter.wordpress.com


i am very optimistic about the direction drug policy (0.00 / 0)
is going in, at least at the state level. here in MI, over 60% of voters approved a medical pot law recently, and the program seems to be going along swimmingly. further, my friends on the state hill tell me that more and more of our critters are seriously considering full on legalization. because our state is so frakking broke, of course, and not because of common sense, but whatever. however we get there, i'll take it.

i'm also glad Holder finally decided not to send the feds after providers in states like mine. talk about a total waste of law enforcement resources.  


pot law (0.00 / 0)
Hemp was strong competition for both nylon (rope) and wood based paper when it was made illegal. The drug aspects were either greatly exaggerated or entirely made up, but the real reason for prohibition was, as usual, greed.

The new factors of climate change and forest harvest obsticles create opportunity (urgency ?) for marijuana law reform.

The trees currently grown on tree farms for paper stock take seven times as long to mature as hemp, and hemp makes better paper. Fast growing hemp is also ideally suited for making bio-char. Bio-char is the natural method of capturing carbon from the air and traping it in the soil for dozens or even hundreds of years. Easily produced bio-char dramaticlly improves crop yield by providing habitat for micro organisms benificial to plants.

These and the MANY other known uses of hemp make keeping it illegal during this Great Recession, this time of great need beyond stupid, suicidal even.

Even as the alcohol industry remains opposed,the chemical industry and the paper industry have much less to fear now than in the 1930s from hemp competation, so now is the time for pot law reform!


Government by organized money is no better than government by organized mob..... FDR


Yes, smoking the good weed does not lead to anti-social behavior (0.00 / 0)
The date rape crises coincided with the crackdown on marijuana during the oh-so-successful 'just say no' campaign.  Pot became more expensive and less available, hence the move to alcohol.  While the stats on alcohol and cancer are interesting, it is important to remember that with drinking comes violence.  

I live in a true blue state--I will have a choice in November

Donate to Open Left









QUICK HITS

Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.


blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search