Heading Back to Maine

by: Adam Bink

Thu Oct 29, 2009 at 14:30


Fresh off yesterday's positive ad, here's today's fear-mongering, with the homophobes Stand for Marriage Maine campaign returning to the schools theme:

I have to honestly say that this ad and yesterday's are two of the strongest, if not the strongest, ads I've seen yet from our opponents. And the fact that they're coming just a few days away from Tuesday, Election Day, really scares me. The opposition is pouring it on- they also went to the statehouse yesterday to hold a presser with groups like Americans for Truth that made its way into the local media.

I'm going back up myself on Saturday and will be there for the duration for GOTV. I just got off the phone with campaign folks, who shared this ad and said there is still a major need for calls and volunteers. The campaign is even providing free housing if you sign up to drive to Maine. If you can't drive, you can call from home.

I am not exaggerating when I say that after watching this entire thing, between yesterday's and today's ads, and the presser, this is the strongest I've seen our opposition play ball in the entire campaign. Please help out.

In Kalamazoo, where Karl-Thomas from Burnt Orange Report is on the ground, he just told me their opposition is going back on the air this weekend. Inspired by yesterday's 3-2-1 Countdown for Equality push around the blogosphere, they have a donor match of up to $5,000. Chip in to see our side's response and help get it on the air. And in Washington State, where there's also a very tough race, they also need help making phone calls to voters.

Six days left. Let's pour it on.

Update: The new DailyKos poll out today has No on 1 at 48%, our opponents at 47%. To quote Phish fans, this thing is tighter than a mosquito's ass.

Adam Bink :: Heading Back to Maine

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Confusing (0.00 / 0)
Has anyone done a poll just reading the question and asking how people will vote? I just wonder because it seems counter-intuitive that a "No" vote actually means "Yes" to allowing gay marriage. Is there a sense on the ground that enough of the voting population is familiar enough with the nature of the question to understand that a "Yes" vote means "No" to gay marriage and vice versa?

I don't know who that would benefit? Presumably if one side's voters averaged a greater level of understanding of the specific question then the others it would be better, but I don't know if that exists. This just seems to me like it has butterfly ballot written all over it.


Is what it is (0.00 / 0)
Most polls I've seen have asked it that way. The DailyKos poll I linked to do as well. The question is what it is, unfortunately.


Me on Facebook
Me on Twitter


[ Parent ]
the DKos poll asked a second question (0.00 / 0)
presumably intended to reduce the confusion:

QUESTION: Regardless of how you might vote, do you favor or oppose allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry legally?

49 percent favor, 48 percent oppose, 3 percent not sure

In other words, similar to the result from the question that used the referendum question wording.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.


[ Parent ]
Good Ad, Unfortunately (4.00 / 1)
I suspect it is scary to certain voters and is very believable.  We want gays to be accepted into our society and gay marriage to be thought of as normal.  They make that sound dark and sinister.

Rain (4.00 / 2)
The forecast for Tuesday is clear in Portland and rain in Augusta, Bangor, and Bar Harbor.  Given that the opponents tend to be elderly and from northern Maine, it looks like the gods may be shining on our side.

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox