Deliver The Goods

by: Mike Lux

Wed Nov 04, 2009 at 10:47


Rather than being an overwhelming sweep, most elections are a mix of good and bad news for each political party and the progressive and conservative movements in our country, and the 2009 off year elections certainly fits into that category.

In the category of the expected, both parties had easy wins: Bob McDonnell won the VA Governor's race in a blowout, while progressive Democrat John Garamendi easily won the Congressional special election to replace Blue Dog Ellen Tauscher.

In the more competitive races, the Republicans won the NJ Gov race, and the Republicans/conservative movement lost the special Congressional election in NY 23rd.

And in the saddest news of the day for progressives, the Maine ballot initiative to strip marriage rights from gays and lesbians narrowly won, although progressives won some other initiative battles like the fight against the highly regressive TABOR initiative in ME.

Republicans, conservative Democrats, and corporate lobbyists are all eagerly lining up to spin the losses in the two Governors' races as evidence that Democrats should become more cautious, go slower with change, pull back on their ambitions. That is the worst possible thing Democrats could do right now. It's a little like conservatives saying that the problem in NY-23 was that Republicans just weren't conservative enough, which you know they will be somehow trying to spin.

Let me try to explain this to the caution captains in my party. There are two reasons we lost those Governors' races yesterday, and they are closely related: voters are in a foul mood, and base Democrats- young folks, unmarried women, minorities- didn't come out.

(More in the extended entry)

Mike Lux :: Deliver The Goods
Let's just spend a minute talking about the economy. Unless we start to produce a whole lot more jobs than even the optimists are projecting right now, voters are going to be in a really foul mood a year from now when they go to vote. Going back all the way to the recession of 2000/2001, economic conditions for most Americans have not been particularly rosy- even in the best of the Bush years, job creation remained too slow to keep up with the new people entering the work force, and wages stayed flat even as expenses on basic necessities like health care, groceries, gas, housing, and college tuition went spiking ever higher. Then the new recession started in late 2007, followed by the financial panic and much deeper economic crisis of 2008. By November of 2010, we will have had the middle class going through seven years of a financially squeezing stagnation followed by three years of economic hell.

So most Americans are going to walk into the polling booth a year from now feeling- well, how do I put this in the most analytical way- really, really pissed. They are going to be looking at taking out their anger on someone, at sending a message that can be clearly heard. And for the young people who haven't found decent jobs, economically struggling single women, and minority voters who overwhelmingly voted for Obama and other Democrats in 2008 and 2010, they could well be feeling that they haven't seen change they can believe in, that they haven't seen the Democrats they voted for and in many cases worked for delivering anything that matters to their lives, and that will make them very tough to get out to vote. That's what happened in NJ and VA this year, and it is incumbent on Democrats to change that dynamic in time for the election in 2010.

In the face of a weak economy, angry voters, and a discouraged Democratic base, Democrats have exactly one chance at surviving the elections a year from now: deliver the goods.

You ran on change in 2008, and voters don't feel like things have changed enough. You ran on taking on the powerful special interests and they still have too much power. You can't afford to get even more cautious, to change things even less, to take on the powerful not so much. We need health care reform that checks the power of the big insurers, and banking policy that ends the overwhelming power of the big banks. We need to produce good jobs now, and not wait for the trickle down policy of waiting for the banks to someday lend to business which will someday hire workers.

Fortunately for us Democrats, the Republicans will continue to hand us some gifts like NY-23. They are moving far enough to the right that we will get lucky in some elections we wouldn't otherwise win, and God bless them for it. But that won't happen often enough. We are going to need to craft a strategy for winning that is based on deserving to win because we delivered important, tangible things that mattered to voters, things that make angry voters understand that we share their anger and are doing something to change things so their lives will be better, and things that help Democratic base voters feel like it is worth voting again. Now is the time for Democrats to stop listening to the whiners who counsel go slow and be cautious on change, and to deliver on the change they so boldly promised.      


Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Deliver The Goods | 10 comments
People will not (4.00 / 6)
be Fired Up and Ready to Go for tepid reforms.

Without the base, Dems lose.

"Change and hope" as slogans don't do much when you are in power.  You have to deliver.  

Can the White House hear?  I don't know.  


Good advice (4.00 / 3)
There's a lot of nonsense abroad these days, so it's nice to read something as solid as this. Deliver the goods. It really is as simple as that.

Or not. The difficulty comes when we start to discuss what goods, and who gets them. If you read the roll call on the anti-Goldstone resolution, I think you have to concede that the Congressional Delivery Service has a long way to go before it brings anything we want to the door. There just isn't enough money in the entire world left of Attila the Hun to pay the freight charges our beleaguered representatives demand to deliver even the smallest of packages, whether they're lining their pockets with the leftovers or not.

For example, Alan Grayson wants two million bucks. He's a good guy, let's hope he gets it. We can talk later about what it all means, but for now, either we pay, or he does. That, too, is a simple proposition, except, perhaps, when you multiply by 435.


"voters don't feel like things have changed enough" Exactly, Mike! (0.00 / 0)
But who's responsible for the missing progress? Well, at least in part, it's those who apologized the Obama team's lackluster efforts at delivering change. People like you, Mike! By reducing the pressure, you allowed the administration and the lawmakers to drag their feet. And, sry, but I think that's missing in your story.

where is this apology? (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
He probably means (0.00 / 0)
apologetics, cheesy justifications.

As for real mea culpas, "I was wrong"s, I haven't heard any of those either, and I don't expect to, ever, no matter how much evidence piles up.

http://attempter.wordpress.com


[ Parent ]
right (4.00 / 1)
But show me the links. Because my impression is he is happy with some changes, happy with the prospect of some bigger changes (real health care reform) and unhappy with delays on other promises. I think that attitude would describe an awful lot of progressive Democrats.

[ Parent ]
? (0.00 / 0)
Not sure exactly what you are referring to here, Gray. I have supported Obama some of the time, and gone after him some of the time. What specifically are you referring to?

[ Parent ]
Aw, come on, Mike, you have gone to great lengths... (0.00 / 0)
...to explain the problems and inner struggles of the Obama administration to us. I also very well remember how selflessly you backpeddled after the official dementi of the quite damning healthcare details you "leaked". It's obvious that you try to create a more positive mood about Team Obama, and that's ok. Some here have criticized you in harsh tones for your rather positive stance, imho a bit unfairly so. Sure it's good not to get carried away by frustration, but to keep the expectations at a reasonable level. But pls don't pretend it isn't true that you're the most administration friendly blogger here at OpenLeft!

[ Parent ]
Where's the sense of urgency in DC? (0.00 / 0)
And for the young people who haven't found decent jobs, economically struggling single women, and minority voters who overwhelmingly voted for Obama and other Democrats in 2008 and 2010, they could well be feeling that they haven't seen change they can believe in, that they haven't seen the Democrats they voted for and in many cases worked for delivering anything that matters to their lives,

And combine with this with the legions of debilitating illness survivors whose insurance is at risk if they do not work, you have very serious social ills to contend with. These conditions do not appear to be on David Plouffe's computer screen, judging from his optimism on The Daily Show last night. He says he expects a call from the WH to return to work one of these days!

Instead, I'd suggest that we support the Fair Elections Now Act, S. 752 and HR 1826 at Change-Congress.org.


It's more about Congress than the White House (4.00 / 1)
Obama won't be on the ballot in 2010, every House member and 33 or so Senators will be.  They really need to deliver the goods, working with the White House -- not by pulling a Deeds and running away.  I predict that for the next year the Republicans will turn some of thier fire from the White House on to Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid (who has a very tough race of his own) and I think they will hit Democrats really, really hard on trumped up corruption (as in 1994) especially Rangle, the PMA Group/earmarks, etc. Democrats need to act now to clean up.  

The worst case is that Congressional Democrats will blame the White House for not delivering and vice versa -- kinda like during the Carter Administration.  It doesn't have to happen.  


Deliver The Goods | 10 comments
Donate to Open Left








Friends of the Earth thanks the OpenLeft community for the ideas you generate and your contributions to the progressive movement.

As an anti-spam measure, there is a 24-hour waiting period after registering before new users can comment.
blog advertising is good for you
blog advertising is good for you
SEARCH

   

Advanced Search