House Republican Leadership To Support Blurring Strategy

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Sep 27, 2007 at 15:48


The Iraq Blurring Strategy isn't just for endangered incumbents anymore:

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) told reporters Thursday that he would likely support bipartisan legislation that would require President Bush to report on his Iraq withdrawal plans.

The bill, H.R. 3087, would require the Bush administration and Pentagon officials to report regularly on the status of their plans for withdrawing U.S. troops.

"I would be shocked if the Pentagon already didn't have this plan sitting on the shelf. That's what they do over at the Pentagon: They plan for every kind of contingency known to man," Boehner told reporters. "So I would expect that, if a bill on the floor looks like the bill that came out of the committee, I would expect all of us to be for it."

Granted, if Boehner really wants to engage the blurring strategy, he is going to have to sell it harder than this. In his comment he admits that the bill won't actually require the adminisatron to do anything it has not already done. However, I have a feeling that when said "bi-partisanhip" legislation actually passes, it will be sold by most talking heads as a real compromise, if not a real step toward withdrawal.

Chris Bowers :: House Republican Leadership To Support Blurring Strategy

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The blurring strategy might work if we have a Dem (0.00 / 0)
Presidential candidate that leaves open the door to our continued intervention in Iraq through 2013, or 2017 if HRC is  the nominee.

And it might work if Biden dictates Dem Iraq policy (0.00 / 0)
Bush wants to spend about a quarter of the new money on the rapid production of MRAPs-a mere $12 billion.  But that's not good enough for Biden, who introduced legislation to increase spending on MRAPs by $23.6 billion, arguing, "We have no higher obligation than to protect those we send to the front lines."

Actually, Senator, you do have a higher obligation: to think through the need for this mission before you vote to put troops in harm's way, as you failed to do when you voted to authorize the Iraq war.  Also, before you rush to create new bottlenecks in the assembly line of the military-industrial complex, producing vehicles that would not be needed if we got out, you might heighten your efforts to force an end to this war. Spending $23.6 billion on fortified vehicles that will take years to produce is an admission that you are planning a long-term occupation of a hostile population in Iraq, and possibly Iran.

From Robert Scheer at http://www.truthdig....


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox