Explaining a "hold" in the Senate

by: Chris Bowers

Wed Dec 02, 2009 at 21:10


Senator Bernie Sanders has placed a "hold" on the vote to reconfirm Ben Bernake as chair of the Federal Reserve.  Even if they are supportive of this move, many people seem to be asking what a "hold" actually does.

A motion to proceed is required for the full Senate to debate, and eventually vote, on a confirmation or piece of legislation.  A "hold" is when one Senator denies unanimous consent on a motion to proceed. Without unanimous consent on a motion to proceed, a cloture vote is required to pass a motion to proceed.  The cloture process is difficult, because it requires 60 votes for passage and quite a bit of time to unfold.

Here is a description of the cloture process on motions to proceed which I received from a Senate aide.  The specific topic of the discussion was health care, but really it could apply to any bill or confirmation:

Leader Reid moves to proceed to an HR [House of Representatives] bill, which will be the vehicle for the Senate health care bill, and files a cloture motion on the motion to proceed

Two calendar days later, the cloture motion on the motion to proceed ripens (there has to be one intervening calendar day between the day you file cloture and the day you have the vote)

The cloture vote on the motion to proceed occurs one hour after we convene on the third day (If cloture is filed on Wednesday, the cloture vote is Friday. If cloture is filed on Thursday, the cloture vote is on Saturday, etc)

Assuming 60 Senators vote to limit debate on the motion to proceed and end the filibuster, the Senate invokes cloture on the motion to proceed

Thirty hours after cloture is invoked the Senate will proceed to vote on adoption of the motion to proceed itself (This assumes (a) consent will not be granted to yield back any post-cloture time on the motion to proceed and (b) consent will not be granted to adopt the motion to proceed itself---adoption of the motion to proceed itself is routinely agreed to by UC but Rs could force a roll call vote).

Upon adoption of the motion to proceed, the Senate will be on the Health Care bill

A shorter version is that it takes about three days, and 60 votes, to overcome a "hold." Sanders has bought opponents of Bernanke some time.

Chris Bowers :: Explaining a "hold" in the Senate

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

If you win this battle, who would you like to replace him at the Fed? (4.00 / 1)


Larry Summers! (0.00 / 0)
Okay, lame joke. Seriously, I would like to know too.

New Jersey politics at Blue Jersey.

[ Parent ]
Why not Stiglitz? ... (4.00 / 3)
If you win this battle, who would you like to replace him at the Fed?

granted it's a pipe dream .. because Rahmbo likely hates him


[ Parent ]
I would hope the point is to provide a teaching moment (4.00 / 2)
of what policies (or better yet assumptions) one would prefer rather than just about who likes whom.  You will likely lose the battle anyway, and, therefore, it is better to think about the larger war. That war to me is over changing assumptions.  Using the theatre to get that point across rather than just make it about this or that person. So, on some level, that's why a name is significant. Not because I think they will win, but because I think they will give a direction.  

[ Parent ]
Amen! (0.00 / 0)
Stiglitz it is!

[ Parent ]
Good idea. However, it would be much better if Stiglitz... (0.00 / 0)
..would replace Summer and Geithner! Their jobs are much more important right now than the helm of the Fed. Bernanke can't do much now anyhow.

[ Parent ]
Coupla things (0.00 / 0)
Presumably, unless Sanders is satisfied with forcing just cloture on the motion to proceed, there'll also have to be cloture on passage of the confirmation motion. (Can't see that winning him many friends amongst his fellow senators, but perhaps he doesn't mind.)

And what about the numbers? Would any other Dem senators vote against cloture with Sanders? Would all GOP senators vote against?  


Possibly .. (0.00 / 0)
Would any other Dem senators vote against cloture with Sanders?

Feingold .. and I'd hope Brown(I can't see why he supports Bernanke) .. maybe Merkley .. Webb should(if he really is all about Jacksonian Democracy) ... would Specter .. to kiss up to the base?


[ Parent ]
Michigan (0.00 / 0)
If any place has a gripe, it's Michigan.  What about Stabenow and Levin?

[ Parent ]
It's astounding to me (4.00 / 4)
that Bernanke is considered likely to be reconfirmed. I would think anybody who was captain of the ship for the last four years would be out. Personally I would nominate Robert Reich, although he might have to leave early to primary Obama.

Bernanke is mainly a technocrat. (0.00 / 0)
And so far, he has shown to be less ideological than Greenspan. Plus, helicopter Bernie has lots of knowledge about the great depression, and that's helpful now. He isn't likely to totally screw up. Certainly there are moreprogressive people qualified for the job, somewhere, but you would have to find them first. And then, they probably wouldn't act any different than Bernanke now. The Fed has no real leeway in this situation, realistically it can only stay the course. So, is a replacement at the top worth the effort?

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox