The Crazy Season

by: Mike Lux

Sat Dec 05, 2009 at 10:30


The end game of any major legislative fight such as what we're going through on health care- when the final deals are being cut on the inside, and the rumors are flying around like starlings- are what I call the crazy season. It's a time that's generally very maddening for all the grassroots activists who have been working on the legislation like crazy, because it really is tough to figure out what is true and what is not. Here are some general rules that hopefully help you understand this season a little bit more:

1. There are probably a hundred rumors a day. 90 of them are just flat out false, spread either because someone misunderstood something, or someone is trying to promote some pet project or kill something, or just because rumors spread on Capitol Hill for no particular reason at all. Maybe nine of them have a seed of truth, but the seed is cross-fertilized with a lot of, well, fertilizer. One of them is probably pretty close to true, but you never know which one it is, and it may well not be true the next day.

2. Don't base any of your assumptions on the words being used. Certain words are code for other things, and politicians are also looking to cover their political bases or even (I know its shocking that there is gambling in this casino) misdirect people from their true intent. In this health care crazy season, I have seen "public options" that don't look anything like a real public option, "triggers" that look a lot more like a decent public option, Stupak "compromises" that are worse than Stupak, and "Stupak language" that is actually an okay compromise. When people hear certain buzz words, don't assume anything because the actual legislative language might be something very different.

3. Don't assume any deal is ever done. Everything- every single thing- remains up in the air. The best way to get to a compromise on one important thing may be to change the language on something else in the bill entirely different.

4. Keep an eye on the fig leafs. A lot of people on every side of this bill have walked a long way out on rhetorical planks over the course of this debate. In order to get a bill passed, at least some of them are going to have to find a politically acceptable way to walk themselves back. The key is to watch who is walking themselves back via a fig leaf compromise, and who is getting most of the substance they wanted.

5. Don't assume that anything in either the Senate or House bill is in there for good. Some things are inserted into bills specifically to be traded away at conference committee time.  

6. Don't panic over anything, just keep organizing for what you want. A lot of groups are doing list building right now, seizing on real or imagined rumors to try to panic people into signing petitions or giving money. Most of these panic attacks are phony. My advice to activists out there is to just keep working hard on grassroots organizing around the issues you care the most about, and not worry too much over the panic attacks.

I know it is frustrating trying to follow what's going on with a debate like health care. There are tons of movable parts, and the traditional media gets a lot of things wrong. The good news is that millions of activists keep fighting to make this a strong bill, and that we still have a good shot at getting that done.  

Mike Lux :: The Crazy Season

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The Crazy Season | 8 comments
Thanks Mike (4.00 / 1)
At this point I have no experience with this and have been confused by the flying rumors.  Thanks for this.  Is it a good time to push again for a robust PO or single payer to tilt things our way, or too late for that?

single payer has never been part of this debate (0.00 / 0)
i'm not very informed but i would guess this would be exactlythe time to push for a 'robust public option or kill the bill.'  

even if you don't mean it, at the end of the day ;)


[ Parent ]
Conference Committee Question (0.00 / 0)
The part of my brain that once kinda sorta understood conference committees has rotted away.  One specific question:  Are conference committee bills required to include language that was in either the Senate or House bill or can they insert something completely new?

Also, I do remember that conference committee reports are NOT amendible, right?


Yes and no (4.00 / 1)
Conference reports can't be amended.

But the rules relating to the contents of the report aren't straightforward.

According to the Senate procedure bible Riddick's - get the conference section here - whilst it's generally true that provisions appearing in both House and Senate versions cannot be touched in conference, that doesn't apply where one house has amended the bill with a substitute  (ie all text after the enacting clause stricken and replaced with a whole new bill).

In this latter case, the scope of the conference report is limited only by a germaneness requirement (p463 of Riddick's).

Now, the technique used for the health care bill in the Senate is precisely that - the text has has replaced the previous text of HR 3590.

So, if HR 3590 goes to conference, conferees will have a relatively free hand.


[ Parent ]
What a great post (4.00 / 2)
Thanks for this. It's very helpful to be reminded of what is really going on (or rather, what we don't KNOW about what's really going on).

I've been doing a lot of organizing for health care reform, and find that it's best not to get caught up in all the rumors and armchair quarterbacking.

Just keep doing the work.


Prescient Post (0.00 / 0)
It seems like we've seen about 8 new variations on the public option and the trigger in the past few days, most of which seem indistinguishable to varying to degrees or at least functionally equivalent.

Speaking of fig leafs (0.00 / 0)
There is a public option replacement plan, which is actually an old idea, to have the managers of FEHBP--which is an exchange--open a similar exchange that everyone could join instead of their state exchanges. This is NOT an alternative to private insurance. Earlier versions of the bill had just a single national exchange until people like Olympia Snowe decided multiple smaller exchanges would be easier for insurers to manipulate. But in truth even the FEHBP has not been able to control costs. Premiums in that exchange are going up an average of 8.8% this year, which is similar to the market as a whole. I am very concerned that a number of progressive senators such as John Kerry are talking approvingly of this idea.

Harkin: this is "a national plan that progressives would like" (0.00 / 0)
Not this progressive.

[ Parent ]
The Crazy Season | 8 comments
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox