National House Ballot Update, December 14th

by: Chris Bowers

Mon Dec 14, 2009 at 12:31


Today's update: Democrats +1.4%

Last update: Dec 13: Democrats +1.3%

Changes in the polls:
--Dec 12 Gallup added
--Dec 06 PPP added

Methodological note: From now on, there will always be exactly four Daily Kos and four Rasmussen polls in the averages.  This smooths out rough edges created by those two polls being released on different days of the week.

Recent results:
2008: Democrats +8.9% (257 seats)
2006: Democrats +7.9% (233 seats)
2004: Republicans +2.6% (203 seats)
2002: Republicans +4.6% (206 seats)

Polls included in the calculation
Poll Sponsor Poll Mid-Date Democrats Republicans
Total Dec 14 41.00 39.56
Gallup Dec 12 48 45
Daily Kos Dec 09 37 33
Economist Dec 07 46 36
PPP Dec 06 44 42
Bloomberg Dec 05 38 42
CNN Dec 03 40 39
Rasmussen Dec 03 39 43
Daily Kos Dec 02 36 32
Rasmussen Nov 26 37 44
Daily Kos Nov 24 37 32
Rasmussen Nov 20 37 44
Daily Kos Nov 18 37 31
CNN Nov 14 49 43
DCorps Nov 14 47 45
PPP Nov 14 46 38
Rasmussen Nov 13 38 44

Chris Bowers :: National House Ballot Update, December 14th
Methodology:

  1. Until the final six weeks of the election, take the simple mean of virtually all polls where the majority of interviews were conducted over the last 30 days.

  2. During the final six weeks of an election, use the simple mean from the last 15 days.

  3. Do not include Zogby Interactive polls and Columbus Dispatch polls, due to their horrendous past performance and questionable methodologies.

  4. Do not include Strategic Vision polls, as it is starting to seem likely those are not real polls.

  5. Include campaign-funded polls. Further, if there is more than one poll from a single organization, include all of them.

  6. In the interests of a smoother average, polling outfits that release new generic ballot polls every week, such as Rasmussen and Daily Kos, will always have the same number of polls in the average.
The basic idea is to cram as many polls with sound methodologies into the averages as possible, and weight them evenly to include more overall data in the sample. Because voter preferences don't really change that much in high-profile elections, I thought this method might produce a more accurate result through logic of regression to the mean. It seems to work pretty well, as my research has shown so far.

This is different from my 2006 and 2008 methodology in that it includes polls from 15 days out from an election, instead of only 8. Further, campaign funded polls, and multiple polls from a single polling firm, are now included. All of these changes were made to include more polls in the averages, since my previous methodology was about 10-20% less accurate than Pollster.com and fivethrityeight.com. Since they had already raised the bar so high, and since they will probably improve their methodologies for 2010 even more, it was time for Open Left to step it up.


Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox