World farm voices, France: Industrial agriculture is "not efficient at all."

by: Natasha Chart

Wed Dec 16, 2009 at 06:00


Third in a series of interviews with farmers affiliated with La Via Campesina, an alliance of international peasant farmer organizations.

Michel David's father was a farm worker, and in 1991, he gave up his own job as a social worker to start farming himself. He now runs a 40 hectare (around 100 acres) organic farm on woody, hillside land where he raises 20 cows among his apples and chestnuts, and came to Copenhagen representing the Confederation Paysanne.

Every year, David says competition from abroad and EU policies that reward large farms close about one farm a day in France, or about 300-400 farms per year. He said the land goes either to bigger farms or to tourist venues and "it's hard for small farms to resist."

David added that international competition could be very unequal, pitting small farms like his against Brazilian ranches with 20,000-100,000 cows, or small sheep farms against 20,000 animal operations in New Zealand.

Of course, David said, there was industrial agriculture in France, as well. He said animals there were often fed genetically modified soy from Brazil or the US, importing 4.5 million tons per year from large industrial farms that hurt small farms in their regions and take protein away from the global South.

I asked David if it wouldn't be better for industrial agriculture to replace all these small farms, if it would be more efficient. He said industrial agriculture "is not efficient at all," that it takes up too much petrol and outside resources. A small farm like his, he said, used up very few resources, ensured the animals were treated well and was "better for the health of the people and the food." He said organically managed soils also captured more carbon and this is better for the climate.

Farming ecologically and encouraging farmers to first feed the people of their own country should be normal, David said. "We have enough to feed the people of each country," he said, and that it wasn't necessary to pit farmers in different countries against each other.

For all that it seems unusual for someone to leave the office for the farm, David enjoys his work very much, responding when I asked about it with an enthusiastic, "Yes, of course!" He said that sometimes he'd like more money, but added, "I like to know the people I feed and I like to feed them properly."

Natasha Chart :: World farm voices, France: Industrial agriculture is "not efficient at all."

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Yup, this shows that misguided subsidies even hurt our farmers. (0.00 / 0)
Really, what's the point of the subsidies? Imho, to make a nation less dependent of food imports (European history shows the risks of such dependence), to ensure a high quality level of the products, and to secure jobs in the agricultural sector. But our (both EU and US, it's more or less th same) current subsidies are not helpful for reaching htese goals, quite to the contrary! They result in overshooting the quantity target, producing more stuff than can be consumed, and resulting in ruining th world market for other nations. They don't result in higher quality, but lower quality products, because the rules favor quantitiy over quality. And they push the sector towards bigger, more industrialized farms, with all the negative consquences (energy use, chemicals replacing labor, animal cruelty), resulting in a steady loss of jobs because of smaller, more ecologically friendly farms being forced out of business. All in all, it's total nonsense on a giant scale!

Good folks like Michel David deserve a better system than this idiotic technocracy. But will the public pick up their cry, and call for meaningful reforms? Where is the outrage?


I'm wondering, too, how much global warming denialism in this country (4.00 / 2)
is simply an effect of alienation. Food appears by magic from faraway, unknown places, products appear by magic from faraway, unknown places, and so there's simply a continually reinforced societal disconnect from what we subsist and function off of. So the logic becomes that all of global warming's problems and solutions will of course also lie elsewhere. Knowing the people that feed you and being fed by them properly is, I tend to think, a matter of no small consequences.

i'm not quite a "farmer" yet (4.00 / 2)
but i do a lot of organic food gardening, and everything David is saying is correct. the more one learns about the food in our stores, the less one is inclined to put it into the body. my goal is to produce %50 of the food i eat someday. but it's hard work, and you have to pretty much treat it like a second job.  

Uh, this is Natasha's story, chicago. (0.00 / 0)
And she deserves some applause for providing us with all those great stories directly from Hopenhagen! Imho this is on the same quality level as the famous "Walter Reid" series at WaPo. Three cheers for Natasha!  

[ Parent ]
well, (0.00 / 0)
David is also the (last) name of the farmer in the story.

[ Parent ]
Oops, damn, sry, my mistake. (0.00 / 0)
I apologize, chicago! And thx for showing me the light, Mike.

[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox