White House (Re)commits to Pushing Drug Importation

by: David Sirota

Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 09:12


My newspaper column last week was on the Obama administration's hideous flip-flop on the issue of drug importation, and the column and the ongoing reporting here at OpenLeft prompted a very solid story at the top of CNN Tonight's Friday broadcast. Watch it here.

As I said, it's a solid piece* that looks at whether the White House political staff manipulated the FDA and/or doctored an official FDA safety warning in order to protect pharmaceutical profits. Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND), who made the allegation, has since stopped talking, likely under intense pressure from the White House and the drug industry. But we'll try to keep reporting out facts on this, as it's a huge story. Politicizing safety agencies a la Karl Rove is positively outrageous - especially when it's all to protect a price cartel.

The good news is that the furor seems to have exacted a commitment out of the White House for future action:

David Sirota :: White House (Re)commits to Pushing Drug Importation
Speaking on CNN's "State of the Union," David Axelrod, Obama's top political aide, said the White House still favors drug re-importation and wants to move forward on it.

"Let me be clear. The president supports re-importation. As he said, safe re-importation of drugs into this country. There's no reason why the Americans should pay a premium for pharmaceuticals that people in other countries pay less for," Axelrod said. "We will move forward on it."

Substantively, this is still dishonest - as I noted in past reporting on this, if the administration really wanted to do importation, as Axelrod claims, it has the statutory authority right now to allow it via a certification by HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. We're all somehow supposed to ignore that reality - as if we're all idiots. We're all also supposed to ignore Obama's campaign commitment - Axelrod offers up no explanation as to why Senator Obama co-sponsored the Dorgan amendment he worked to kill nor any explanation as to why candidate Obama's campaign promise to support it was broken.

That said, this back-and-forth is a good example of the point that I made yesterday: Namely, that when movements push hard and call out transgressions/corruptions, we at least have the chance to extract future commitments from those in power. If it was up to the Obama administration's whim, they wouldn't want to touch drug importation ever again. We know this because they worked diligently to kill the drug importation amendment last week. But because there was such a firestorm about what they did and how they did it, their top spokesman was forced to go on television and commit to revisiting the issue in the near future.

So while I'm disgusted at this administration for working to protect the drug industry and breaking President Obama's clear campaign promise (which you can see him making in the CNN video), I'm glad there's at least a commitment we can try to hold them to in the coming weeks and months. I'm not saying the commitment has any credibility - after all, the administration has destroyed it's credibility on this issue. But I am saying at least the fight will go on.

* My only real problem with the piece was CNN not making clear that about 40 percent of medicines on the domestic market right now were manufactured overseas - that is, importation is already happening right now, this bill would have just let pharmacists and wholesalers buy those medicines at lower world-market prices.


Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Dorgan going quiet is NOT the way to get rational Drug Importation (4.00 / 2)
As I've said a few times at OL, progressives should have repeatedly hit Obama over the head about his backstabbing deal with Tauzin/Big Pharma, demanding an apology (and frankly, hoping they don't get it until good healthcare legislation is on the President's desk, ready to sign. The President's word isn't worth too much, and playing softball with a guy who will sell you out in a heartbeat isn't very clever....).

If Dorgan really wants Drug Importation to be made rational, he will NOT keep quiet.

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


And this time they really mean it! (4.00 / 3)
C,mon, don't you want to kick that football?

His corporate masters (0.00 / 0)
will never allow it - most likely, just need some propaganda to catapult when they proclaim their POS healthscam is a present from sanity claus.

[ Parent ]
I'll believe it when I see it (4.00 / 4)
If I recall, candidate obama talked about ending endless wars and that we "could take that to the bank."


The "promise of future commitments. . ." (4.00 / 4)
along with a dime is worth about ten cents.

Instead of trying to kick the football (4.00 / 5)
Its time to kick Lucy right square in the a$$

"Oh. My. God. .... We're doomed." -- Paul Krugman
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...


I wonder . . . (0.00 / 0)
if it will be easier for the Admin. fulfill this campaign promise after the Senate finishes work on a particular piece of legislation I've been hearing a lot about lately.

USA: 1950 to 2010

And you believe that? (4.00 / 1)
PHRMA rules.  

I second that. (0.00 / 0)
Thanks, David, for all of your hard work on behalf of We the People! It makes a big difference.

miasmo.com

[ Parent ]
Paul Krugman has come on board to destroy the filibuster (0.00 / 0)
unlocking the Progressive Senators from the fewer corrupt ones will go a long way to letting the emerging progressive majority govern.

Governing is almost the opposite of what they are doing now. I cannot think of any cue for the situation that we are in that does not go through:

through a majority vote changing Senate rules on the first day of a new session.

Nobody should meddle lightly with long-established parliamentary procedure. But our current situation is unprecedented: America is caught between severe problems that must be addressed and a minority party determined to block action on every front. Doing nothing is not an option - not unless you want the nation to sit motionless, with an effectively paralyzed government, waiting for financial, environmental and fiscal crises to strike.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12...
(registration required sorry)

--

The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky


Column (4.00 / 2)
The best part is this is in his column, not his blog.  There is a whole other world out there that only reads the newspapers who have no idea about any of this.  With even actual Senators beginning to talk about the problem, it seems this issue will actually become a real talking point.

There is still a long ways to go before anyone will actually do something about the filibuster, but these are very important first steps.  The Overton window is beginning to budge.


[ Parent ]
Wherein Charlie the Progressive gets punked...again (4.00 / 1)
Photobucket

"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything...Mankind are forever destined to be the dupes of bold & cunning imposture" -- Alexander Hamilton

But importation possible under existing law! (0.00 / 0)
As noted in one of Sirota's earlier pieces on this, existing legislation permits drug importation.

In comments on that piece, I queried why, if that was so, the admin had not used the legislation. (The point kind of died.)

I now see that the legislation is §1121ff of the Medicare Act of 2003 (PL 108-173).

This essentially provides a scheme for importation of drugs which the HHS Secretary has certified are safe and cheaper than those available in the US.

I can accept that this legislation may be far from ideal as the basis of a permanent structure for importation - though the 63-28 cloture vote on importation in the Senate shows that the idea had rather wider bipartisan support than Dorgan's amendment secured!

But for the admin not to have used the law at least to test the waters seems to me bizarre.

Ditto that pro-importation groups don't seem to have pressed the WH to do so.  


Yes, very bizarre that Dorgan even introduced the legislation - (0.00 / 0)
Also bizarre is Sirota's conclusion:

So while I'm disgusted at this administration for working to protect the drug industry and breaking President Obama's clear campaign promise (which you can see him making in the CNN video), I'm glad there's at least a commitment we can try to hold them to in the coming weeks and months. I'm not saying the commitment has any credibility - after all, the administration has destroyed it's credibility on this issue. But I am saying at least the fight will go on.

You've got to be kidding me. Sirota is satisfied to cover up the WH's, if not illegal, unethical actions?

I hope the last sentence about the fight going on means there'll be more reporting.

I know this is no good for Obama and the Dems....I don't know...


[ Parent ]
USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox