Even in defeat, Blue Dogs will keep adding new members

by: Chris Bowers

Tue Dec 22, 2009 at 12:40


Today, it was learned that Blue Dog Parker Griffith will be leaving the Democratic caucus altogether, and joining the Republican caucus.

POLITICO has learned that Rep. Parker Griffith, a freshman Democrat from Alabama, will announce today that he's switching parties to become a Republican.

According to two senior GOP aides familiar with the decision, the announcement will take place this afternoon in Griffith's district in northern Alabama.

Important notes and context on this shift:

  • The partisan composition of the House will now be 257-178, in favor of Democrats.

  • Turns out that the over $1,000,000 the DCCC spent on Griffith was well spent.  They just helped elected a Republican.  

  • Griffith had actually voted with Republicans 84.85% of the time on crucial votes already, anyway, according to Progressive Punch.

  • Even so, Griffith might face right-wing primary challenger, anyway.

  • On top of Griffith, three Blue Dogs had already announced their retirement this year. Dennis Moore (KS-03), Bart Gordon (TN-06) and John Tanner (YN-08).  However, rather than depleting Blue Dog ranks, this allowed the Blue Dogs to just welcome in three members from their waiting list:  Betsy Markey (CO-04), Scott Murphy (NY-20) and Kurt Schrader (OR-05).

    Blue Dogs cap their membership at 20% of the entire Democratic caucus, in an attempt to maintain cohesion.  They have rejected quite a few applicants, and won't have any difficulty filling Parker Griffith's slot.  In fact, while one would think that massive Blue Dog defeats would result in the caucus being discredited, even if two-dozen Blue Dogs lose in November, the list of applicants to their waiting list will probably only get longer. It simply never occurs to center-right Democrats that strengthening their relationship with the center-left base is smarter than moving to the right.

Personally, I say good riddance to Griffith.  He was costing us money in re-election, and providing no key votes.  He was just a monetary black hole.
Chris Bowers :: Even in defeat, Blue Dogs will keep adding new members

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
If you judge dems by actions (0.00 / 0)
and not their rhetoric - the "black hole" you mention is very large indeed.  

Just the fact that LIE-berman was able to actually ENDORSE and campagn for mclame, keep his chairmanship, and be given a grand thrown to derail healthcare reform should be proof.

Supporting this party will always mean supporting repugs via "blue dogs".  It is that simple.

Actions speak louder than words and the sell-out on HCR, using a bogus date 5 years in the future as if that is our only choice is also proof that obama/rahm and the dems have sold us out.


the DCCC should keep this in mind (4.00 / 1)
when deciding how to allocate resources next year.  

Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.

We should keep this in mind (4.00 / 1)
before giving to the DCCC, DSCC, and DNC next year.

[ Parent ]
I think virtually no-one around here will be donating to those 3 (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Democrats are doomed!!!! (4.00 / 1)
Sorry, had to go with what the national headlines are going to be for the next few weeks.

The man is a snake and a coward... He's the guy that said he wouldn't vote for Nancy Pelosi or whatever... a doctor who is against health care reform (and is going to claim that health care is what drove him to the other side, so you'll see plenty of him on TV)... He's been accused (by the GOP ironically enough) of diluting cancer drugs to save money and now he's taking the chicken's way out.

It's certainly frustrating that after our big wins we couldn't get even ONE switcher, but now we've got a few going the other way.  I'm sure the GOP will be screaming 1994 all over again.  

Supposedly, the local GOP candidates in the area are pissed as hell and are still going to mount a primary challenge against him.  I think the challenger will win... No one likes a disloyal creep like this guy.

But, I'm glad he's gone, too... Of course the timing was designed to try and derail the health care vote which makes him even more of a slimeball.  I'm glad we won't be spending any more money on him.  He's quite worthless.

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


TPM is reporting that he will be teabagged... (4.00 / 1)
Good!

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
membership cap (0.00 / 0)
Considering the influence of the blue dogs over the leadership, this seems to have been effective. Should there be a Strong Progressive Caucus, with a similar cap? Are there even enough progressives willing to block legislation to fill the group out at 20%?

Progressive power (0.00 / 0)
All it would take is actually following through on a promise to vote en bloc against bad legislation. (They can start with the state-level Stupak in conference. If Nelson doesn't like it, offer to repeal Hyde instead. Progressives have got to learn to negotiate. The fate of the bill is Rahm's problem. He made the shit sandwich, let him eat it.)

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox