AIG isn't paying back 30% of the loan

by: Chris Bowers

Thu Jan 07, 2010 at 19:38


The Treasury Department claimed earlier today that the latest scandal surrounding Tim Geithner's sweetheart deals to AIG doesn't matter, because AIG is on track to pay back the loan.  Even if it were true, that response is still highly offensive, because it assumes that a few billion dollars of Fed money--rather than, say, a crashed economy and government collusion to protect the people who crashed the economy--is all that made people upset about the bailouts.

But what's more, the Treasury Department's claim that AIG will pay back the full loan is completely false.  The New York Fed forgave $25 billion of the loan to take an ownership stake in AIG that meant no actual control.  From a letter Representative Alan Grayson sent to Ben Bernanke:


The New York Fed's entire loan was $25 billion.  On top of low interest payments, no limits on executive pay, and other sweetheart deals, the New York Fed allowed AIG to be forgiven for 30% of the entire loan for utterly meaningless concessions in return.  So, even though the Treasury Department's response to the latest scandal would have been offensive even if it were true, it isn't true at all.

Oh, and here are some more results of Geithner's decision to allow AIG to regulate itself.  Most of the bonuses AIG execs promised to give back in order to avoid legislative action were not actually given back (hat-tip reader JD):

When word spread earlier this year that American International Group had paid more than $165 million in retention bonuses at the division that had precipitated the company's downfall, outrage erupted, with employees getting death threats and President Obama urging that every legal avenue be pursued to block the payments.

New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo threatened to publicize the recipients' names, prompting executives at AIG Financial Products to hastily agree to return about $45 million in bonuses by the end of the year.

But as the final days of 2009 tick away, a majority of that money remains unpaid. Only about $19 million has been given back, according to a report by the special inspector general for the government's bailout program.

I am angry about this not just as someone who finds the policies involved abhorrent, and not just as someone who has taken a really big hit because of the Great Recession.  I am pissed about all of this as a Democrat.  Watching the Obama administration and center-right Democrats in Congress continue to collude with the financial services industry is sickening (even apart from the bailout, check out the outcomes of the mortgage reform, student loan reform, and financial regulation fights).  They are pissing away our generational opportunity to really help people, and seriously imperiling the Democratic Party at the ballot box in the process.

As Natasha reminded me earlier today, we worked as hard as we could to put these people in charge, and these are the results we are getting.  It turns my stomach.  What a waste.

Chris Bowers :: AIG isn't paying back 30% of the loan

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The magnitude of the tear in the world's economy (4.00 / 2)
is more than $64 trillion.

What we are seeing is a shell game, three card monte:

In its full form, Three-card Monte is an example of a classic short con in which a shill pretends to conspire with the mark to cheat the dealer, while in fact conspiring with the dealer to cheat the mark.

I have nothing but outrage against the idiots, starting with Alan Greenspan and the New York Fed which oversaw the issuance of fraudulently-rated mortgage derivatives and credit default swaps (with no prudent reserves).  

'Poor people' had nothing whatsoever to do with it. Our economy will continue to limp along at the continuing expense of the middle class with extraordinary unemployment, because if people really did get bailed out CDS would be worthless! The market depends on a continuing slow meltdown!

This was not a hiccup. It is a continuous purge, and all we can do is drink a bit of water against the unremitting vomiting and diarrhea as we waste away.  

They only call it class war when we fight back.


Obama was always a creature of the elite, (4.00 / 3)
a safety valve, a way to forestall what Sirota dubbed "The Uprising".

Nothing more.

For Progressives, Obama was a holding action, a way to buy time in order to rally more forces to "Crash the Gates".

Nothing more.

2009 was not spent rallying forces, but attriting them to the astroturf movement of the Teabaggers.

Our trajectory is well known: the world will descend into a full-spectrum crisis* during which there will be a collision between the forces of 1789 and technologic despotism:

are we prepared? are we even preparing?

* economic, environmental, military, political, and spiritual.


There is more - Maiden Lane II and III (4.00 / 4)
A Stroll Down Maiden Lane

Maiden Lane - a super special investment vehicle bought tens of billions of dollars in securities that had credit default swaps written by AIG.  This was done to cancel AIG's CDS exposure.  These securities are sitting on the Federal Reserves balance sheet. There is a huge question of the value of these securities.

RebelCapitalist - Financial Information for the Rest of Us.


This happened in Chicago, too (4.00 / 6)
As Natasha reminded me earlier today, we worked as hard as we could to put these people in charge, and these are the results we are getting.  It turns my stomach.  What a waste.

A lot of people in Illinois felt the same way after working hard to elect Obama to the state senate as an "Independent". In Chicago, "Independents" are a coalition of African-American activists and white liberals based in Hyde Park who oppose the Daley machine, its corruption, and the patronage system used to control the city.

"I am not thrilled with Barack, simply because we elected him as an Independent, and he switched over to Daley," Alan Dobry said. Ivory Mitchell, speaking of Obama's Senate race, said, "When he won the primary out here and he went downtown, it appears as though Daley took over the campaign for him. . . . We were excluded." — The New Yorker

Within a few years, Obama sought out the help of Mayor Daley to try to oust incumbent Democrat Bobby Rush from Congress. He later endorsed Daley for re-election over two challengers despite a series of City Hall corruption scandals. Obama also worked closely with Rahm Emanuel to elect Rod Blagojevich to the governership.


Typical, (4.00 / 2)
Say whatever you need to say to win and then do whatever the hell you please.   Obama is more than a waste of time.  He is a disaster.  

[ Parent ]
Chris ... (0.00 / 0)
you read Barry Ritholtz .. right ... if so .. you'll know the likelihood of the USG ever getting fully paid back by AIG is virtually nil

Does this update warrant a mention? (4.00 / 3)
Bloomberg:

Geithner Had 'No Role'

"Secretary Geithner played no role in these decisions," Meg Reilly, a Treasury spokeswoman, said in an e-mail. "He was recused from working on issues involving specific companies, including AIG," after his nomination for Treasury secretary on Nov. 24, 2008. Geithner "began to insulate himself weeks earlier in anticipation of his nomination," she said in a separate statement.

Geithner, who was tapped by President Barack Obama, took the Treasury job in January, 2009. Mark Herr, a spokesman for New York-based AIG, declined to comment.

It might be worth a mention.  Just saying.  


Interesting - SIGTARP Report Has Geithner DIRECTLY INVOLVED (4.00 / 7)
Looks like we have an official report from the Special Inspector General for TARP which directly refutes Meg Rielly's statement.  From page 18 of the report:
                                               
After discussing the counterparties' reactions, including UBS's conditional acceptance to give a 2 percent haircut, 26 the officials recommended to President Geithner that the Maiden Lane III transactions go forward without haircuts because it would be impractical to obtain haircuts from all the counterparties. Mr. Geithner concurred, and it was decided that FRBNY would cease efforts to negotiate haircuts and pay the counterparties the market value of the CDOs. When combined with the collateral already posted, this effectively meant that counterparties would be paid for the credit default swaps at par value.

Download and read the report (Factors Affecting Efforts to Limit Payments to AIG Counterparties SIGTARP-10-003) at www.sigtarp.gov.

So now Geithner's department is starting to lie about the whole thing. This is really starting to stink. FIRE GEITHNER!


[ Parent ]
More Example In Report (4.00 / 2)
As I keep reading there are many more examples where it's Geithner running the deal with AIG.  

Read the report.  He testified to Congress after the report was out, and I do not remember him refuting the SIG's description of events.


[ Parent ]
they (0.00 / 0)
certainly need to clarify any discrepancies.  

[ Parent ]
Worth mentioning? For a laugh. (0.00 / 0)
Cheney denies torturing.  

[ Parent ]
Well (4.00 / 1)
you have about three posts on the front-page here that assert that Tim Geithner instructed AIG to withhold information from the SEC and Congress and that he should be fired as a result.  But that decision was made after Geithner had recused himself from individual dealings with companies in anticipation of his nomination to be Treasury Secretary.  He isn't denying he had a role in the AIG pass-thru, although I'd note the Special IG's report explains the 100% par in some detail and explains why the two alternatives that were considered were found impractical.  I just think it should be noted that the Secretary denies any involvement in the decision to have AIG withhold information and that that denial is not implausible given the timeline.  You can reject that denial if you like, but you ought to acknowledge it.  

[ Parent ]
Your last paragraph sums up my feelings to a T n/t (0.00 / 0)


At what point do people who want to save the Democratic Party brand throw Obama under the bus? (4.00 / 1)
Not just 'his' crappy healthcare plan, or whatever mediocre or crummy laws the Dems come up with, but Obama, himself? This question is directed at people who put the Democratic Party over the country, as a whole.

435 Dem Primaries 2012
Coffee Party Usa
TheRealNews.Com


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox