Youth turnout: Oregon special election far outpaced Mass--for good reasons

by: SarahBurris

Sat Feb 06, 2010 at 14:00


(We don't have to accept the failed top-down party leadership on any front, in any way.  This is an important example. - promoted by Paul Rosenberg)

Turns out if you do youth outreach in an election you have higher youth turnout.

If you read my take on the returns from the Massachusetts special election for the US Senate race then you know that Mass had some issues with reaching out to young voters. There was some confusion about who was going to do it.. or if it was going to happen... Someone even suggested the youth outreach was "well the President came..."

In the great state of Oregon we have a fantastic organization who has worked for years to get young voters to the polls, but also be engaged during years in between. The Oregon Bus Project worked the hell out of this special election and the results were noticeable.

In Massachusetts they had a turnout of 15% of 18-29 year olds for the special election. In the Oregon's special election about 24% turnout of youth voters (preliminary estimates from CIRCLE)

Caitlin Baggott from the Bus says that this is due to a few particularly important factors:

  • A year-round and multi-year strategy,
  • Populist messaging and policy development,
  • Budget (actually spending money on youth outreach
  • And finally, which I'll expand on, a focus on field and youth turnout

When it comes to a meaningful field outreach campaign Caitlin points to two major elements

  • A strong field campaign matched with a strong media campaign. Oregon Student Association, the Bus Project, and the coordinated campaign registered 30,000 voters--primarily on campuses and youth-dense parts of Portland and Eugene. The campaign led a huge GOTV field program to knock on 300,000 doors. We all phonebanked the hell out of our lists. (The Bus got a "thank you" message today from a voter who decided to vote after getting 15 phone calls from us.)
  • We expected it to be better than VA and MA. We're hoping that the lesson for all of us in 2010 is that young people will vote if we (1) Re-Register them, and (2) invest in youth-oriented GOTV. OSA and the Bus executed a huge youth-focused voter registration program in Oregon, and the Bus did youth-focused mail, earned and paid media, and phonebanks. (Trick or Vote for the fall!)

So here's the thing. Do the outreach. Do it because it builds the party long term, but do it because, I don't care what state you're in... it will make a difference and it could make the difference enough to win your election.

But wait, there's more...

SarahBurris :: Youth turnout: Oregon special election far outpaced Mass--for good reasons
 

Tuesday, was the Illinois special election and Julie Hamos who was running for Congress lost by 700 votes. She was a good EMILY's List candidate, a friend of mine was the field director, she was an incredible candidate.  Instead of EMILY's List bundling money, or perhaps in addition to bundling money, what if the major independent expenditure from EL was that they mobilized young single women in that race the way Women's Voices Women Vote did in 2006 and 2008?  How might that race have been different?

Elections can be won or lost by young voters if you know how to do the outreach.  The trouble is teaching campaigns and candidates what to do and sell the field staff on investing in it.

Last year when Organizing for America (OFA) first started, Future Majority posted speculating on meaningful youth outreach from the very top of the Democratic Party.  Connery wrote:

"Where is Students for Barack Obama and Generation Obama in all of this? Considering all the props given to young voters by President Obama and (DNC) Chairman Tim Kaine, you would think that there would be at least some mention of how the youth element of the campaign will roll into all of this. The lack of information about youth engagement is peculiar. My fear is that such engagement work will be completely outsourced to USA Service, the independent entity that is getting spun out of the Obama campaign."

We've watched over the last year as the Democratic partisan infrastructure has done what it always does: zero youth outreach.  The White House has done zero meaningful work with young people outside of asking them to serve their community or country in some capacity (though this is beginning to change, specifically with the Climate Change Bill).  The House Majority remains the most interested in opinions of young people when it comes to policy, with good outreach from The Speaker and a few Committee Chairs that "get it."  But youth specific orgs remain the only ones doing work with young voters and the Millennial Generation.

This week OFA sent out a video from David Plouffe.  After the colossal youth fail in the Massachusetts Special Election (15% turnout), two of the highest priorities of OFA, only after the fact, is bringing first time 2008 voters back to the polls in 2010 and registering new voters.

For a year, we've been howling at the moon asking where everyone was with youth outreach.  Saying, that if you don't continue to engage them, then it will be near impossible to get the same result without the Obama Campaign to do the outreach that was done in 2008.  Now it seems they've all realized... oh no! we can't win without them.. turns out 24million of them showed up in 2008 over 60% for Obama....

I've heard these pleas before.  Last July in fact:

After a speech from Rep. Chris van Hollen, the chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, where he begged a group of young people to help get out the youth vote in 2010.  I asked him then what the DCCC was doing to teach their candidates about youth outreach.  His response:  We're showing our candidates the data, but its up to you.  Not exactly the winning field plan that can garner results.

Crossposted from a blog that's been talking about this FOREVER: FutureMajority.com


Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Excellent Diary (4.00 / 3)
Youth turnout should be of primary importance for Democrats in general, and progressives in particular. Oregon and Mass should make that clear.  And this shows that while it might be typical to have low youth turnout, especially in non-presidential election years, it is not inevitable.  We need to replicate this sort of program in states everywhere.  

Hopefully, someone will promote this diary - this is a conversation that we need to be having.

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


This is a very important issue, and a silver line on the horizon (4.00 / 2)
Every Dem running for election should take notice! Regarding the increasingly hostile political climate, all but the most blue seats will be in jeopardy if the candidates don't manage to overcome the lame MA returns when reaching out to the young liberal base. Dems should connect to all relevant organisations now to ensure solid support in November. And helping those groups with fundraising may be a good idea, too. GOTV isn't for free.

And While We're At It (4.00 / 4)
Let's beef up our people of color voter outreach as well.  Oh, and low-income people.

Eff it, let's just work on more voting for everyone disproportionately underrepresented.  They're disaffected for a reason.

Figuring out how to be a progressive college graduate transplant to Ohio:  http://citizenobie.wordpress.com/


This is an excellent point (4.00 / 1)
I think there are models out there where long term organizing has taken place involving outreach in communities of color and poor communities has taken place - LA is a good example, where it has largely been led by labor. (This gated article tells more.) All these models deserve more attention, and to be implemented in more communities.  If anyone knows of more examples, I would love to hear more about them.

The Democratic leadership is probably not going to lead on this. They will continue to lament low turnout among the young (and other key Democratic constituencies), but this will not necessarily lead to action. (Although some candidates do see the value.)  

But for all the talk of what Obama or the Democrats should do, this here is an example of what we can do - support and help create organizations like the Bus Project.  

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


[ Parent ]
The Mass vote was for candidates (4.00 / 1)
The Oregon vote was for funding measures.   There are substantial differences between the two in the minds of people.  I will never be convinced that the Mass vote was not affected by a retribution attitude.   On the other hand, the Oregon vote (I'm an Oregonian) was the result of two things.  First we have had years of bad citizenship by the corporations.  They do not pay their share of taxes.  They have even gone far out of their way to politically and legally avoid community taxes.   Oregon doesn't have a sales tax, thank god, so it depends on income tax and property tax to fund state and local governments.  As such, we have to go to the income tax when we need more revenue for state funding.   Secondly, over the last thirty years, the wealthy and the corporations have behaved so badly that the progressives in Oregon responded overwhelmingly.  

It took years for this state of mind to take over in Oregon and  it would be hard to replicate it in other states in the short term.  Similar conditions would have to exist.

"Oh. My. God. .... We're doomed." -- Paul Krugman
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...


[ Parent ]
You keep insisting that Oregon is unusual in it's attitudes (4.00 / 1)
about taxation, yet polls suggest that the policies it has implemented enjoy very broad support.  I can't reconcile that fact with your Oregon is unique argument, which as far as I can tell, is based solely on you picking out some facts about Oregon and insisting, for unspecified reasons, that they are the key. In all seriousness, I find the argument that there is only state where corporations have acted badly to be laughable. (Also, lots of states have restrictions on how taxes are raised.) The state of mind already exists - the difference is that in Oregon it was mobilized.

Don't forget that despite the public's alleged aversion to all taxes, TABOR has only passed in one state, despite being on the ballot in many. It has always, with one exception, failed.  

Also, the program that was used in Oregon is similar to campaigns that have been conducted in other places where candidate support was an element. That is, this success is not as unique as you think.  That doesn't mean that ballot initiatives and elections are the same. In fact, I don't recommend organizing solely around candidates. But they are not wholly different either.

I don't know what this means or how it relates to this discussion:

I will never be convinced that the Mass vote was not affected by a retribution attitude.

Also, I didn't suggest, and I don't think anyone else did either, that it would be easy to replicate this overnight elsewhere. It is a longer term strategy than Democrats normally take. That is a good thing.

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


[ Parent ]
OK, let's see if I can find a different way to put it. (0.00 / 0)
Oregon is different than Mass, other states may be like Oregon, that I'm not sure of.   Oregon didn't just arrive at this point  instantaneously 2 weeks ago.   It took years to develop the issues that resulted in the recent election results.  My point is this, it is very unlikely that you could recreate the Oregon scenario in less than 4 to 6 years in more than a few states.  You can completely forget about the South and the Midwest.  You have to have a motivated Progressive majority and I don't think that exists in those states.  You also have to have a motivated progressive legislature and governor.   All of those things came together in Oregon.  Put on top of that the immediate banking and job crisis and we got our laws passed.  

I think you are right that other states should try to recreate a more progressive tax structure, but there is more to it than just campaigning.  This didn't occur here until we were on the verge of the state government collapsing.

My remark about Mass is that typically Democratic voters voted for Brown.   I think that was because they were upset with Obama and Congress.  The vote in Oregon had nothing to do with national politics other than they had caused a lot of pain in Oregon.  Again, I think what you suggest is worth  a try, but success will most likely be more regional than national.  But with the red states being what they are, I'm not sure the problems can be solved nationally.


"Oh. My. God. .... We're doomed." -- Paul Krugman
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...


[ Parent ]
This we agree on (0.00 / 0)
It is a longer term strategy than Democrats normally take. That is a good thing.

I think, as I pointed out above, that the effort has to come from within, however, that doesn't preclude outside organizational help.  Americans seem to have developed a majority diffidence with the concept of progressive marginal tax rates.  When they hurt enough, think 1932, they become less Gordon Gekko and more FDR.  

"Oh. My. God. .... We're doomed." -- Paul Krugman
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...


[ Parent ]
Seem (0.00 / 0)
Americans seem to have developed a majority diffidence with the concept of progressive marginal tax rates. When they hurt enough, think 1932, they become less Gordon Gekko and more FDR.

Your whole argument revolves around this, but as you acknowledge, you don't really know if it's true - only that it seems to you that it's true.  But, if Americans were uncomfortable with progressive taxation to pay for social investment, than poll numbers would be different than they are. If they were Gordon Gekko, they would gladly adopt TABOR, but they don't.

Many good things came together in Oregon, but that is not the same as saying that if these things didn't come together, this could not be recreated.  

Politics is the art of the possible, but that means you have to think about changing what is possible, not that you have to accept it in perpetuity.


[ Parent ]
I think that with the existing economic conditions and present leadership (0.00 / 0)
Our country is likely to be motivated to move in the same direction as Oregon.  I just don't see the signs of people lining up at the starting gate yet.

In all honesty, I'm just not buying anymore hope.  Got all I could handle in 2008.

"Oh. My. God. .... We're doomed." -- Paul Krugman
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.c...


[ Parent ]
Any Questions Why ACORN Is So Hated? (4.00 / 2)
Seriously.  ANY questions?

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
One Has Only To Look To Tom Tancredo (4.00 / 2)
For a very honest manifestation of Republicans' greatest fear- representative democracy.

Because representative democracy would acknowledge the fact that there are different linguistic groups in America, and that we have huge populations (undocumented immigrants, ex-offenders, non car owners, those with ultra-barriers to committing to anything beyond taking care of themselves- think overworked and stressed parents and young people) effectively locked out of social participation by default.  And representative democracy would do things that are anathema to the Republican/Conservadem agenda- public education, universal health care, a civilized public transportation system, real support for working families in order to give those groups an easier time.

Regarding youth engagement in politics: as a young person just out of college, I can say that while just being jaded and cynical plays a role, so does the fact that my demographic is really fucking broke and struggling for survival and scrabbling for a sense of self-worth when we find ourselves at the bottom of the food chain, surrounded by rejection, and in a state of near-shock from having lost most of our usual supports (unless we live at home, which is for many a further blow to confidence and self-worth, because we're not "strong enough" to make it on our own).  Can you imagine taking the time to engage in our disastrous political process when you're trying to figure out your economic and identity's very survival?

And I'm an upper-middle-income young person!  It's gotta be REALLY hard for people who're worse off than me.

Not to whine or anything, but wading through the morass of news and political insanity is tough- compounded with personal issues that need resolving there's a lot of challenges to organizing on a wider scale.

Figuring out how to be a progressive college graduate transplant to Ohio:  http://citizenobie.wordpress.com/


[ Parent ]
And That's EXACTLY What's Intended (4.00 / 2)
Keep the folks on the bottom dazed and confused, and the folks above them militant and well-organized.

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3

[ Parent ]
Student Loans (4.00 / 1)
Also a HUGE impediment- again of course for college grads.  It goes without saying that those without college education have their own sets of ample barriers.  Check out "Hollowing Out The Middle" (http://www.amazon.com/Hollowing-Out-Middle-Rural-America/dp/0807042382/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1265490833&sr=8-1)- non-college-bound kids are often just totally neglected and unsupported.

Figuring out how to be a progressive college graduate transplant to Ohio:  http://citizenobie.wordpress.com/

[ Parent ]
ACORN? They deliver a steady stream of voters for the Dems! (0.00 / 0)
That's enough to make them the #1 enemy for right wingers. And Dems don't hate ACORN, they simply treat the group like shit, which is the traditional way they act towards all their allies.

Hmm, I'm suprised you even asked this, Paul. This isn't much of a secret at all...


[ Parent ]
Oops, I misread your comment. (0.00 / 0)
Rhetoric question, ok. I'm damn slow today...

[ Parent ]
The 18-29 vote dropped 2% over 2008 in Mass (4.00 / 1)
I have now seen the Massachusetts Youth Turnout argument made 4 times in the last few days.

It is wrong

It is empirically wrong. This is not subject to debate.  If you take the 5 minutes to take a look at the data, you find this out.  I have come to the conclusion that people don't care what the evidence is, they just want to make this argument.

Now if David Broder were making these statements, I would accept them.  But I expect more from the blogs, particularly this one.

For the record, in Massachusetts in 2008, a historic year for youth turnout,  voters aged 18-29 accounted for 17% of the votes.  In 2006 - an off year election that is arguably more similar to this race, it was 11%, and in the other off year election that we have exit poll data for, 1998, it was 10% (the 2002 exit poll data was so bad it was never released).  In fact, in 2004 the 18-29 vote in Massachusetts, with a Massachusetts Senator on the ballot, was 16%.

I have cited these number before - frankly google finds this data for you very quickly.

I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but I have little tolerance for people making political arguments who don't first look at the data.


Remember (4.00 / 2)
The Oregon Bus Project originated back in 2002. We need long term thinking with a Bus Project in all 50 states.  

"Righties have no idea what we lefties think, because they never listen to us. They listen to the straw lefties that live in their own heads, and then they explain to each other what we think."  - Barbara O'Brien


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox