How the Washington Post Protects the Village

by: Matt Stoller

Thu Oct 04, 2007 at 14:58


In 2006, HUD Secretary Alfonso Jackson was caught admitting in a speech that he openly steered contracts to Republicans, and was placed under investigation.  Today, Edward Pound of National Journal reported that the scandal has deepened, and that Jackson might have lied to Congress about his meddling in HUD contracts.

At the time, though, reporters like Charles Babington were scoffing at bloggers for caring about corruption.  Here's Babington, in a chat with readers dismissing the scandal as the huffing and puffing of liberal naifs.

Pittsford, N.Y.: The left-wing of the blogosphere is expressing outrage over the news that HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson won't give contracts to those who say they oppose the president. Aren't they being a bit naive? Hasn't politics always worked that way (at least since Andrew Jackson instituted the "spoils system)? I'm a bit surprised that anyone could be that Pollyannaish about the ways of the world and Washington. What do you think about this?

Charles Babington: I think people operating in Washington generally are more discreet. You'd think that someone who just landed a big federal contract would keep to himself the thought that, By the way, I hate your president.... And you'd think an administration official might handle it by saying, You should have enough discretion and courtesy to utter such thoughts somewhere other than my office.

Rarely is there such a clear and cynical statement from a reporter about the norms of the Village.  Later in the chat, a reader filled in Babington.

Virginia: Alfonso Jackson has now changed his story - via his spokesperson:

"He was merely trying to explain to the audience how people in D.C., will say critical things about the secretary, will unfairly characterize the president and then turn around and ask you for money," Tucker said. "He did not actually meet with someone and turn down a contract. He's not part of the contracting process."

I guess it was all a misunderstanding ...

Charles Babington: Thanks for the update.

Jackson is now being investigated by the FBI for lying about being part of the contracting process.  Who's being naive, Charles?

Matt Stoller :: How the Washington Post Protects the Village

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Those Silly Bloggers Worried About Corruption In the Grant Administration (0.00 / 0)
Does he seriously think he's the only one who can name-drop about the 19th Century?  And that there has never been any push-back about this sort of thing?

Besides, my understanding of the historical record as presently understood is that Jackson turned out to be only marginally more political in who he hired than others who went before him.  What got people's panties in a twist was that his allies were not the same old crowd that had been monopolizing things before him.

Shades of "Travelgate."

"You know what they say -- those of us who fail history... doomed to repeat it in summer school." -- Buffy The Vampire Slayer, Season 6, Episode 3


The bureaucratic barbarians run amok, story in the Style section (4.00 / 1)
Whenever the DC cocktail party circuit says Oh the Administration would never do X bad behavior, confided with all the pompous self assurance they can muster, you can bet your bottom dollar the Administration sure as sh*t has already done X bad behavior, many times, and they did it with a big middle finger extended to everyone whose puny precious sensitivities might be disturbed by a bunch of amoral frat boys looting and pillaging the national treasury and vandalizing the constitutional foundations of our United States of America.

USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox