Catholic Charities follows through on hostage threat

by: Adam Bink

Thu Feb 18, 2010 at 19:00


Back in November I wrote a piece regarding how DC Catholic Charities was holding poor people and kids without homes as hostages over the marriage equality bill (which went onto pass the DC Council overwhelmingly, was signed by the Mayor, and is nearing the end of the Congressional approval process without any incident). Catholic Charities pushed a red herring, claiming that under the marriage equality bill, they might be forced to end services altogether in DC because they didn't want to be forced to place children in the homes of same-sex parents, even though anti-discrimination laws had already been on the books for years, mandating that. Luckily, no one on the DC Council bought it, and in one of the proudest moments I've ever had of elected Democrats (and Catania, an independent), one by one, nearly every one of them came out and essentially told Catholic Charities to take a hike.

Since the DC bill is set to officially become law on March 3rd and fire and brimstone will rain down from the sky same-sex couples in DC will gain full equality, yesterday, Catholic Charities decided to end its foster program altogether rather than license same-sex couples. As expected, another group stepped forward to work with the 35 families in the program- locally-operated National Center for Children and Families- which will not discriminate. Tommy Wells, the DC Councilmember who oversees the Committee on Human Services, said the transfer went smoothly.

Good. If they aren't in the charity business for charity's sake, then don't take the money. Any group that takes taxpayer money- on the order of $20 million to Catholic Charities- shouldn't be allowed to discriminate in this fashion. And good on DC Councilmembers for taking a stand against discrimination and a false argument.

Adam Bink :: Catholic Charities follows through on hostage threat

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Glad they took a stand as well (4.00 / 1)
Families are better off w/o their "help" anyway. Anything with a religion attached to it isn't good.

Extraordinary progressive star in the making

you mean there's a price for their love and compassion? (4.00 / 1)
I'm shocked!

ha ha (0.00 / 0)
you have to pay for that too

Extraordinary progressive star in the making

[ Parent ]
My wife and I went to a Catholic Charities to volunteer (4.00 / 2)
we left after about an hour when we realized what kind of "help" they wanted to give people.

No, no!!! We don't EAT the bible, we reeeeead the bible! (0.00 / 0)
First, you accept the baby Jesus into your heart, and then you get to eat.

[ Parent ]
Not to defend them in DC (4.00 / 1)
But in a completely different line of work in another part of the country, my wife works for Catholic Charities (she is not Christian) and there is no religion at all involved in her job. As far as I know it is their policy not to mix religion with their work or talk about it with their clients. The only thing is they are not supposed to help people get abortions or advise them to, but she can refer them to someone else of her choosing if the subject comes up.

Catholics aren't all that into evanglization... (0.00 / 0)
Unlike their protestant counterparts, they do take social justice seriously.  Even their anti-gay stance is much more charitable than many protestant denominations.  

REID: Voting against us was never part of our arrangement!
SPECTER: I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!
REID: This deal keeps getting worse all the time!


[ Parent ]
Christian hypocrisy knows no bounds... (0.00 / 0)
they behave like they were in a holy war or something.

and they used bad tactics: they should never have announced their plans. They should have just waited for lawsuits. Five Disreputable freaks of modern life on Scotus would have taken care of them.

They only call it class war when we fight back.


USER MENU

Open Left Campaigns

SEARCH

   

Advanced Search

QUICK HITS
STATE BLOGS
Powered by: SoapBlox